[1. Call to Order]
[00:00:02]
SO THE TIME IS RIGHT AT 7:00 PM.
I THINK WE'RE PRETTY MUCH READY TO GO.
SO THE MAY 12TH, 2021 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING IS CALLED TO ORDER AT 7:00 PM.
I'LL ENTERTAIN ROLL CALL AT THIS TIME.
IF THE COMMISSIONERS ARE PRESENT, IF HE WAS SIGNIFIED BY SAYING PRESENT, OR I COMMISSIONER SILVER COMMISSIONER, OVERTON COMMISSIONER BRIGHTWELL, COMMISSIONER HANEY, COMMISSIONER O'MALLEY COMMISSIONER LUCAS, PRESENT COMMISSIONER ERASMUS, COMMISSIONER BAILEY AND MYSELF, SONYA BROWN.
I AM PRESENT, BUT WE ONLY HAVE FOUR COMMISSIONERS.
DID I COUNT THAT RIGHT? IT WASN'T FOR ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR, FIVE.
I HAVE OVERTON LUCAS, HANEY AND MYSELF.
WHO AM I MISSING? WHAT DID YOU SAY? UH, RASMUS.
BRIGHTWELL IS PRESENT AS WELL, SO WE ARE GREAT.
[3. READING OF MINUTES]
CONSIDER APPROVING THE MINUTES FROM APRIL THE 14TH, 2021.THANK YOU, MS. LUCAS, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.
UM, ANY NAYS? ANY ABSTENTIONS, HANEY OR STAIN? OKAY.
[4. REPORTS]
ITEM FOUR, A THE COMMISSION REPORTS, UM, CHAIR, WHICH WOULD BE MYSELF.I JUST WANTED TO POINT OUT A COUPLE OF THINGS.
UH, COMMISSIONERS, WE ARE GETTING READY TO MOVE BACK TO IN-PERSON MEETINGS AT THE BEQUEST OF CITY COUNCIL.
UM, THOSE IN-PERSON MEETINGS WILL BEGIN NEXT MONTH IN JUNE.
UM, FROM WHAT I DO UNDERSTAND, UM, ARRANGEMENTS ARE BEING MADE FOR SOCIAL DISTANCING, UM, TO ENSURE, YOU KNOW, THAT WE HAVE ENOUGH SPACE TO SIT SEPARATE, YOU KNOW, FAR ENOUGH APART FROM ONE ANOTHER.
UM, OF COURSE WE'LL BE ASKED TO WEAR OUR MASK IS MUCH AS WE POSSIBLY CAN.
UM, MY ONLY CONCERN WITH IT IS IF IN THE EVENT THAT WE GATHER TOO MANY PEOPLE WHERE WE CAN'T SOCIAL DISTANCE, THEN THAT WOULD BECOME A CONCERN.
BUT UNTIL THAT TIME COMES, UM, WE WILL BE GIVING IT A TRY IF THERE ARE ANY COMMISSIONERS THAT, YOU KNOW, HAVE SOME CONCERN OVER IT OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, PLEASE, PLEASE REACH OUT TO ME SO THAT, UM, WE CAN GET YOUR CONCERNS HEARD AND EXPRESSED.
AND, UM, WE'LL, WE'LL TAKE IT FROM THERE AND SEE HOW IT WORKS.
I HAVE ONE MORE ITEM TO DISCUSS WITH YOU GUYS AS WELL.
IN JULY, WE WILL BE HAVING A WORKSHOP.
I KNOW WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT NEEDING SOME EXTRA TRAINING AND WORKSHOP.
UM, A WORKSHOP IS THE BEST PLACE TO DO IT.
WE DON'T HAVE A DEFINITIVE DATE AS OF YET, BUT, UH, JENNIFER AND, UH, JIMA WILL BE GETTING WITH US.
UM, ON THAT DAY, UH, SOON IN PARTICULARLY WE'RE GOING TO COVER TWO THINGS AND THAT WILL BE ACTIONS THAT, UH, WE CAN TAKE AS A COMMISSION AND HOW WE SHOULD PRETTY MUCH TAKE THOSE ACTIONS AND THEN PROCEDURES, ESPECIALLY AS THEY RELATE TO FINAL PLATS AND, UM, DIFFERENT THINGS LIKE THAT.
SO I THINK IT'LL BE, IT'LL BE A GREAT REFRESHER FOR ME, UM, AND REALLY, REALLY GOOD, ESPECIALLY FOR SOME OF THE NEWER COMMISSIONERS.
SO I'M REALLY LOOKING FORWARD TO THAT.
UM, THAT CONCLUDES MY WELL, I HAVE ONE MORE THING I WANTED TO SAY, THOUGH.
UM, MS. JENNIFER THOMAS GOMEZ IS NO LONGER OUR INTERIM DIRECTOR.
[00:05:01]
SHE'LL COMMENT A LITTLE BIT MORE ON THAT HERE IN JUST A MOMENT.ARE THERE ANY REPORTS FROM OTHER COMMISSIONERS? OKAY.
SEEING NONE WE'LL MOVE FORWARD.
WE'LL MOVE NOW TO STAFF REPORTS.
UM, WELL DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, JENNIFER.
MA'AM WE HEAR YOU WELLNESS SO GOOD TO SEE YOU.
WELL, WE TOOK YOUR ADVICE AND SO I THINK ALL STAFF, UH, VIDEOS SHOULD BE ON, SO YOU SHOULD SEE, UH, MOST ALL STAFF.
I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH THE COMMISSION, UH, IN THIS CAPACITY AS WELL.
UM, AND I DO WANT TO DO, WE'LL DO FORMAL INTRODUCTIONS NEXT YEAR, BUT, OR IN JUNE.
UH, BUT WE DO HAVE TWO NEW STAFF PLANNERS, UM, THAT HAVE JOINED OUR TEAM.
UM, AND SO THEY STARTED THIS WEEK.
UH, ONE IS ON THE CALL, UM, MIGHT BE A FAMILIAR FACE TO THE COMMISSION, UM, BASED IN GARCIA, UH, HAS RETURNED AND HE IS IN THE PLANNER TO, UM, POSITION.
UH, SO YOU ALL WILL BE ABLE TO, UH, SEE HIM LIVE AND IN PERSON NEXT MONTH, UM, AS WELL AS OUR, UH, NEWLY STAFF PLANNER, ONE POSITION.
SO, UH, WE ARE VERY EXCITED ABOUT, UH, THE OPPORTUNITIES THAT THEY BRING AND LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH THEM AND THEM WITH YOU BOTH.
UM, AT THIS TIME WE'LL UM, MR. DAVIS, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING FROM ENGINEERING? CAN YOU ALL HEAR ME? YES, SIR.
ENGINEERING REPORTS FOR TONIGHT.
AT THIS TIME, THIS IS THE PUBLIC COMMENT.
IT'S AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSIONERS.
UM, IN REGARDS TO, TO AN ITEM THAT MAY NOT BE ON THE AGENDA, THAT IS NOT ON THE AGENDA, SEEING NONE WE'LL MOVE FORWARD.
[CONSENT AGENDA]
AT ITEM SIX, A THE CONSENT AGENDA, UH, THE ITEMS BELOW ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION.ONE WILL CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS PARK AT PIKE, AND GESSNER TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SIENNA PARKWAY, SECTION FIVE STREET, DEDICATION THREE, CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HERITAGE PARK DRIVE FOUR AND WATERS LIKE BOULEVARD, PHASE FOUR STREET DEDICATION FOR CONSIDERING AN APPLICATION FOR FINAL PLAT FOR GREENS LANDING AND FIVE.
CONSIDER AN APPLICATION FOR A FINAL PLAT FOR HIM, SICK MEN OF SWAN ISLAND.
IS THERE A MOTION? THE THANK YOU, MR. HANEY.
IS THERE A SECOND? THANK YOU, MR. BRIGHTWELL.
IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.
AND I AS WELL, ARE THERE ANY NAYS OR ABSTENTIONS? OKAY.
WE'LL MOVE NOW TO ITEM SEVEN, THE ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS,
[7.A. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT]
UM, A WILL BE A PD, UM, WE'LL RECEIVE COMMENTS FOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST BY IRAQ.ALL RIGHTY, PLEASE FORGIVE ME IF I SAID IT WRONG ON DLA ARCHITECTURE TO ZONE AND APPROXIMATE 0.67 ACRE TRACT OF LAND TO PD TO ALLOW FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A LEASED SPACE BUILDING AND TO CONSIDER SOME FLEXIBILITY IN REGULATIONS, MY INSURANCE, I'M GOING TO PRESENT THIS ITEM.
MA'AM WE HEAR YOU WELL, SO THE MAP ON THE SCREEN SHOWS THE PROJECT LOCATION AT THE INTERSECTION OF FMSCA 92 AND FIFTH STREET.
UM, THE OUTLINE, UH, SHOWN THERE, IT SHOWS, UH, A LITTLE TRAIN TRIANGULAR PIECE, UH, RIGHT THERE AT THE INTERSECTION, UM, WHICH IS THE SUBJECT SITE.
IT IS CURRENTLY ZONED LC THREE, WHICH IS OUR REGIONAL COMMERCIAL, UH, RETAIL ZONING.
AND, UH, THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING TO MAXIMIZE, UM, AREA WITHIN THIS PROPERTY TO DEVELOP A LEASED SPACE CENTER.
[00:10:01]
ON THE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS HAVE KIND OF MARKED UP THE SITE PLAN THAT'S INCLUDED IN YOUR BACKGROUND MATERIALS.UM, THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN SHOWS HOW THE APPLICANT HAS TRIED TO LAY OUT, UH, THE BUILDING, UM, AS WELL AS THE ASSOCIATED, UH, PARKING, UM, AND LANDSCAPING SCREENING ITEMS. SO BASED ON WHAT THE APPLICANT HAS PRESENTED, UH, THE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDE, UM, A RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE PD, UH, CONTINUED TO APPLY THE L C3 RETAIL DISTRICT, UH, REGULATIONS, UM, EXCEPT WHERE CALLED OUT, UM, TO PROVIDE VARIANCES, UH, FOR THOSE DEVELOPMENT.
UM, SO THOSE VARIANCES WOULD INCLUDE UNDER HEIGHT AND AREA, UM, LOOKING AT THIS FOOTPRINT WITH THE BUILDING FACING FIFTH STREET.
UM, AND AS THE PROPERTY GOES INTO THAT INTERSECTION, UM, YOU KNOW, LAND, THAT'S NOT ABLE TO BE UTILIZED FOR THE BUILDING.
UM, IT'S LOOKING AT PROVIDING A REDUCED REAR YARD.
UM, THE GENERAL AREA FOR THAT REDUCE REAR YARD IS SHOWN WHERE THAT DOTTED RED LINE, UM, LINES.
SO BASED ON THIS CONFIGURATION, THERE'S JUST LIKE A LITTLE SKIP, UM, OF THE BUILDING THAT WOULD ENCROACH INTO WHAT WOULD TYPICALLY BE REQUIRED BY THE C3 DISTRICT.
UM, SO THE RECOMMENDATION BEFORE YOU, UM, IS TO APPROVE ALLOWING FOR THIS LAYOUT, UM, AND THE BUILDING TO BE WITHIN THIS PROXIMITY TO BOTH, UH, THAT EASTERN PROPERTY LINE, AS WELL AS THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE.
PART OF THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS IF YOU CAN SEE THE AREA THAT IS WITHIN THAT RED BOX, UM, THERE IS WHERE THE APPLICANT HAS TENTATIVELY PLACED A TRASH ENCLOSURE.
UM, IF YOU GO BY THE SITE TODAY, UH, THE SITE JUST TO THE EAST IS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION, UM, FOR A RETAIL SHOPPING CENTER.
UM, THEY DO HAVE A CROSS ACCESS DRIVEWAY THAT'LL CONNECT, UM, TO THIS PROPERTY.
UM, SO PART OF THE RECOMMENDATION IS TO NOT ALLOW FOR THE TRASH ENCROACHMENT, UH, WITHIN THAT, UM, REAR YARD SETBACK.
UM, BUT ALSO THAT THE APPLICANT WOULD NEED TO RELOCATE THAT TRASH ENCLOSURE SO THAT, UH, A CONNECTION CAN BE MADE, UH, TO THAT ADJACENT PROPERTY.
THE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS ALSO INCLUDE, UM, PROHIBITING OUTSIDE PLACEMENTS, STORAGE, UH, SALES AND SERVICES, UH, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS TRACK DUE TO, UH, THE VARIANCES THAT ARE BEING CONSIDERED, UM, TO REDUCE SOME OF THE AREAS, UM, THAT, UM, MAKE THIS AREA, UH, THAT MAKE FOR LESS DEVELOPED DEVELOPABLE AREA, UM, ON THE SITE.
ON THE LANDSCAPING SIDE, UM, THE RECOMMENDATIONS INCLUDE, UH, DECREASING THE SIZE OF WHAT WE CALL THE TRANSITIONAL BUFFER YARD.
UM, AND THAT'S TYPICALLY ON THE STREET SIDES OF THE PROPERTY, UM, AS IT RELATES TO THIS, UM, DEVELOPMENT ALONG FIFTH STREET, UM, WHERE YOU SEE THE DARKER GREEN, UM, KIND OF LINE, UM, AT THIS ANGLE, UH, THAT WOULD TYPICALLY BE REQUIRED TO BE A 20 FOOT, UM, WITH OF LANDSCAPE BUFFER, UH, NO PAVEMENT, NO PARKING, UM, JUST A GREEN SPACE, UM, INCLUDING ASSOCIATED TREES, UM, SHRUGS AND A COMBINATION THEREOF, UM, BASED ON THIS CONFIGURATION WITH THE AMOUNT OF LAND THAT THEY'RE WORKING WITH, UM, THEY'RE LOOKING AT DECREASING THAT WIDTH SO THAT THEY CAN, UH, PROVIDE FOR PARKING.
AND ALSO THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT, UH, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DECREASING THE WAY WHAT THEY'RE DEPICTING ON THE SITE PLAN IS ABOUT A FOREFOOT, UM, WITH A TRANSITIONAL BUFFER YARD.
SO THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION, UM, IS THAT THEY DO A MINIMUM FIVE FEET, UM, SO THAT THERE'S SUFFICIENT ROOM FOR, UH, TREES, UM, AS WELL AS SHRUBS, UM, AS, UH, WOULD BE PROVIDED WITHIN THAT AREA.
UM, STAFF IS ALSO RECOMMENDING TO ALLOW FOR THE PLANNING ISLANDS AND DIAMONDS, AND, UM, ON THIS CONFIGURATION IS A PLANNING ISLANDS, UH, THAT ARE SHOWN, UH, TO MEET THE REQUIREMENT FOR, UM, LANDSCAPING WITHIN A PARKING LOT.
UM, AND I DON'T KNOW IF HE CAN MAKE IT OUT THERE.
UM, THE AREAS IN QUESTION ARE IN GREEN DOTTED BOXES, UM, THAT ARE SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN FINALLY UNDER LANDSCAPING, THE RECOMMENDATION INCLUDES, UH, REQUIRING, UH, LANDSCAPING ALONG THE EASTERN SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINES.
AND SO THAT'S THE AREA THAT'S SHADED IN THE LIGHTER GREEN, UM, ON THE SITE PLAN.
UM, THIS WOULD BE THE BACKSIDE OF THE BUILDING.
SO WHERE YOUR EQUIPMENT BOXES MIGHT BE LOCATED, UM, YOU KNOW, JUST GENERAL, UM, UM, YOU KNOW, LOADING, UNLOADING FOR ANY USES THAT UTILIZE THAT FACILITY.
UM, THIS AREA WOULD PROBABLY BE MOST VISIBLE FROM THE 10 92, A RIGHT OF WAY, AS WELL AS THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
SO THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS,
[00:15:01]
UH, TO REQUIRE, UH, LANDSCAPING SCREENING, UH, WITHIN THAT AREA, THAT PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT FOR SIGNS, UH, THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS, UH, TO PROHIBIT, UH, PERMANENT SIGNAGE WITHIN THE REDUCED, UH, TRANSITIONAL BUFFER YARD ALONG FIFTH STREET.AND WHAT THAT ESSENTIALLY MEANS IS, UM, UH, RESTRICTING MONUMENT SIGNS, UM, FROM BEING IN THERE SO THAT THERE'S NOT A CONFLICT WITH, UH, THE LIMITED SPACE AND THE PROVISION OF LANDSCAPING, UH, FOR SCREENING PURPOSES, UH, THE, UH, PROPERTY OWNER, APPLICANT DEVELOPER, UM, THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO STILL LOCATE, UM, A MONUMENT SIGN AT THAT INTERSECTION, UM, IN THAT LIGHTER GREEN AREA, UM, THAT SHOULD STILL BE VISIBLE FROM THE FIFTH STREET, UH, 10 92, UM, CORRIDORS, UM, BUT IT JUST WOULDN'T INTERFERE WITH THE REDUCED LANDSCAPE BUFFER.
AND I BELIEVE THAT THAT IS THE EXTENT OF THE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS.
UM, THE APPLICANT IS ON THE LINE IF THE COMMISSION HAS ANY QUESTIONS.
UM, AND THEN I AM HERE AS WELL.
UH, IF THE COMMISSION HAS ANY QUESTIONS FOR US, JENNIFER, YOU HAD A NOTE ABOUT THE DRAINAGE, AND I COULDN'T UNDERSTAND FOR SURE IF YOU WERE JUST HIGHLIGHTING THAT THIS IS AN ONGOING ISSUE GOING FORWARD OR IF, OR IF IT APPLIES TO THIS PROJECT.
SO IT'S, IT'S REALLY A NOTE, UM, GOING FORWARD, UM, WE'RE WORKING WITH THE UTILITIES DIVISION OF PUBLIC WORKS, AND I DON'T KNOW IF JEREMY, UM, HAS ANY INFORMATION TO SHARE ON THAT NORTHEAST OR OYSTER CREEK, UH, WATERSHED.
UM, BUT THE CITY AND QUAIL VALLEY HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THE DRAINAGE CAPACITY IN THAT AREA AS IT RELATES TO NEW DEVELOPMENT.
SO, UH, QUAIL VALLEY UTILITY DISTRICT HAS REQUESTED ADDITIONAL COORDINATION WITH THE CITY, PARTICULARLY WHEN WE LOOK TO, UH, REZONE PROPERTIES, UM, AND CHANGE, UM, KIND OF WHAT THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS ARE.
UM, IN THIS CASE, IT'S NOT REALLY A CHANGE BECAUSE THE UNDERLINE BECAUSE THE EXISTING ZONING IS C3.
UM, AND SO THE DISTRICT, UM, SHOULD HAVE THAT FACTORED INTO THEIR LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS.
UM, THAT IS SOMETHING THAT, UM, THE COMMISSION SHOULD BE AWARE OF.
AND, UH, WE'LL PROBABLY HAVE MORE CONVERSATIONS, UM, ABOUT THAT AS WE LOOK AT IMPACT FEES AND, UM, UH, DRAINAGE FACILITIES FOR THIS AREA.
I JUST HAVE ONE QUICK QUESTION, JENNIFER, IF WE, AREN'T GOING TO ALLOW THE TRASH, UH, TO SIT TO THAT FOR A CORNER KIND OF UP AT THE FRONT, WHERE, WHERE WE SUGGESTING THAT THEY PUT IT AT, I DON'T EVEN SEE HOW A TRUCK GET BEHIND THE BUILDING, IS THAT POSSIBLE? RIGHT.
AND I, AND I'LL PROBABLY, UH, TOSS US TO IRAQ IF YOU WANT TO WEIGH IN ON, YOU GUYS COULD LAY THAT OUT ON THE DESIGN.
UM, BUT I WOULD SAY IT'S SUCH A TIGHT SITE RIGHT THERE AT THE INTERSECTION.
UM, IT'S GOING TO BE DIFFICULT, UM, TO LOCATE A, A COMMUNITY TRASH, UM, AREA.
UM, IF THAT PARTICULAR AMOUNT AVAILABLE, UM, FROM THE, FROM, FROM THE DRAWING, UH, IN THE PACKET, IT SEEMED LIKE THEY HAD A LOT OF EXTRA PARKING OR FAR EXCEEDING WHAT THEY WERE REQUIRED TO HAVE.
AND THAT, THAT SEEMED ODD TO ME GIVEN THAT THEY'RE TRYING TO MAXIMIZE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN THIS SMALL SPACE.
UM, SO I DON'T, I DON'T KNOW IF THAT WAS INTENTIONAL OR NOT, BUT OBVIOUSLY THAT'S AN OPPORTUNITY.
UM, SINCE THE APPLICANT IS, UH, PRESENT, UH, I SAW HER EARLIER IF I DON'T KNOW, UH, COMMISSIONERS, YOU GUYS HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF JENNIFER FIRST? OKAY, GREAT.
THIS IS COMMISSIONER OVER, UH, JENNIFER, JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT, YOU WERE SAYING THAT YOU GUYS WILL DO A STUDY AS FAR AS IT BECOMING ANY KIND OF FLOOD ISSUE.
IS THAT WHAT YOU WERE SAYING AT THIS TIME? YOU COULD NOT REALLY PREDICT WITHOUT A STUDY OR SOME KIND OF SURVEY THAT UNDERSTAND THAT, CORRECT? NO.
THE, THE COMMENT ON THE, UM, THE CAPACITY IS, UH, THE CAPACITY OF THE EXISTING FACILITIES, UM, FOR THAT NORTH NORTHEAST OYSTER CREEK, UM, UH, DISTRICT AND ESSENTIALLY WHAT A 12 VALLEY MUD WHO OPERATES, UH, THE FACILITIES THAT SERVICES AREA, UM, THEY'RE AT CAPACITY WITH THOSE CURRENT FACILITIES.
UM, SO THEY'RE WORKING WITH THE CITY'S UTILITY DIVISION AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, UM, ON, UH, SOLUTIONS,
[00:20:01]
UM, BUT ESSENTIALLY WHERE IT WOULD IMPACT, UH, DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES IN THE ASSUMPTIONS, UM, SO THAT THEY CAN PROJECT OUT, YOU KNOW, WHAT THEIR FUTURE NEEDS ARE GOING TO BE.UM, AND SO THE COMMENT THAT'S IN THE REPORT, UM, IT'S JUST THE CORRELATION WITH, UH, ZONING.
UM, AND AS WE LOOK AND CHANGE, LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, UH, THAT WE DO IT IN COORDINATION WITH QUAIL VALLEY UTILITY DISTRICT, UM, AND THE CITY'S UTILITIES DIVISION, JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT, UM, THEIR PLANNING AND PROJECTIONS ARE ON TARGET AS WELL.
SO IT'S NOT, IT'S NOT A REFERENCE THAT THERE IS A DRAINAGE OR A DETENTION PROBLEM.
UM, JUST ON THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS THAT GO INTO, UH, THE CAPACITY PROJECTIONS NOW WILL THE MUD DIRECTORS HAVE TO GIVE APPROVAL AND EXTEND IN ANY CAPACITY.
SO IT'S NOT, UM, WHAT, WHAT HAPPENED FOR THOSE PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT AND SAS? THEY PLOT THE PROPERTY, UM, BASED ON, UH, THE ACTUAL SQUARE FOOTAGE AND DEVELOPMENT THAT THEY LOVE.
THEY'LL HAVE TO REQUEST CAPACITY FROM THE CITY.
JEREMY DAVIS AND HIS TEAM WOULD BE PART OF THAT PROCESS.
UM, IRAQ, WOULD YOU, UM, WOULD YOU LIKE TO JUST GIVE US, UH, UH, WOULD YOU LIKE TO SHARE ANY OTHER COMMENTS IN REGARDS TO YOUR PROJECT? UH, YES.
MA'AM ACTUALLY, OUR SITE IS SO TIGHT AND, UM, WE TRY OUR BEST, BUT I THINK THIS IS THE, UH, BEST DESIGN THAT'S WE HAVE, WE HAVE TIED TO FIND ANOTHER OPTIONS.
WE DO IT, BUT THE BUILDING IS SMALL.
IT'S NOT WORTH IT TO BUILD IT, TO BE HONEST STUFF MAKES SENSE FOR THE OWNER EVEN TO SPEND MONEY, UH, IF WE MAKE IT SMALLER THAN THAT.
SO THAT'S WHY WE ASKING FOR, UH, THE GLAND DEVELOPMENT, UH, I HOPE, UH, TOOLBOX, UH, I, WE WILL TRY TO LOCATE THE DENTIST, BUT, UM, AS I, AS YOU MENTIONED BEFORE, IT'S REALLY SO TIGHT, SO I DON'T KNOW HOW IT'S GONNA MORE EXPECT.
DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? OKAY.
WELL, I GUESS THERE WERE A COUPLE OF OTHER POINTS.
I MEAN, OBVIOUSLY THE TRASH RECEPTACLE THING WAS, WAS THE BIGGEST, UH, UM, I GUESS, IMPEDIMENT, BUT THERE WAS, THERE WAS IN THE ACTUAL REPORT, A COUPLE ITEMS ABOUT LANDSCAPING STUFF AND, AND, AND I GUESS AS LONG AS THE APPLICANT IS OKAY WITH THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS, AND IF WE BOTH THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS IN, THEN, THEN, UH, I DON'T, I DON'T THINK THERE'S AN ISSUE.
SO IT SEEMS LIKE THE ONLY QUESTION MARK, THE REAL QUESTION MARK IS STILL THAT, THAT TRASH, TRASH STORAGE PLACE.
UM, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION IN REGARDS TO THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT? I DIDN'T RECEIVE RECEIVE ANY, UM, PROTEST OR IN SUPPORT.
WAS THERE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING? I DIDN'T HEAR ONE, BUT I MIGHT'VE MISSED IT.
SHE JUST SAID JUST NOW I THOUGHT GENERALLY THERE'S A MOTION IN A SECOND TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THEN CLOSE IT.
UM, NO, GENERALLY WE DON'T, UH, WE JUST GO STRAIGHT INTO IT.
IS THAT NOW I'M GOING TO BE A NEW REQUIREMENT.
I DON'T BELIEVE IT'S AN ACTUAL REQUIREMENT.
UM, IT'S JUST, WHAT'S TRADITIONALLY DONE I GUESS, ON OTHER, UH, ON CITY COUNCIL AND OTHER BOARDS, BUT, UM, OKAY.
IF YOU ALL, TYPICALLY DON'T MAKE THE MOTION THEN, UM, I DON'T THINK IT'S REQUIRED.
I KNOW WE TYPICALLY ONLY MOTION.
I MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE IT BECAUSE IT ISN'T AN AGENDA ITEM.
IT'S ALREADY ANNOUNCED AS IT'S A PUBLIC HEARING.
SO WE JUST DRIVE THROUGH THE AGENDA.
I DON'T SEE ANY PEOPLE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK.
IS THERE A MOTION THAT WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING EMOTION? WILL YOU CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING? THANK YOU, MR. PARK.
WELL, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE AND I AS WELL, THE MOTION CARRIES
[00:25:02]
MAKE A MOTION.WE SUBMIT THIS TO THE CITY COUNCIL, UM, WITH A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION, UH, THE REPORT, UM, AS WRITTEN AS BRITAIN VERY WELL.
OH, THANK YOU SO MUCH, MS. RASMUS.
UM, IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? I HAVE ONE QUESTION.
UM, BACK OF THE BUILDING IS NOT ACCESSIBLE TO FIRE.
IS THAT GOING TO BE A PROBLEM WHEN THEY GO TO TRY TO GET THIS PERMITTED? SO IT'S GOING TO BE THE HOST REACH.
UM, AND SO THE, THE HOST REACH WITHIN, I THINK IT'S 200 OR 300 FEET.
UM, BUT, UH, FIRE ACCESS WILL PROBABLY BE OFF OF FIFTH STREET, UM, OR A PORTION IT'S IN 92, UH, TO REACH, UH, THE BACKSIDE.
SO YOU GUYS ARE GENERALLY CONSIDERED THAT, SO IT WOULDN'T BE A DEAL KILLER FOR THEM.
AND WE'VE, WE HAVE HAD A PRE-APPLICATION MEETING, UM, WITH THEM.
SO THE FIRE DIVISION HAS HAD A CHANCE TO WEIGH IN.
UM, THEY HAVEN'T PROVIDED THEIR, THEIR TECHNICAL ANALYSIS.
UM, SO THAT'LL STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH, BUT THEY DO, THEY ARE AWARE OF THE PROJECT.
AND TO BE CLEAR ON THE DRAINAGE THAT THEY WOULD FALL WITHIN THE NORTHEAST WATERSHED FOR REGIONAL DETENTION.
WE DO HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND ON THE TABLE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.
ARE THERE ANY NOTES COMMISSIONER OVER TO NO, THANK YOU SO MUCH.
[7.B. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ]
ITEM SEVEN B WAS REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA TONIGHT.IT WAS WITHDRAWN BY THE APPLICANT.
[8. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENTS]
UM, WE DON'T HAVE ANY ZONING, TEXT AMENDMENT NOR ANY OTHER BUSINESS,[9. OTHER MATTERS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE COMMISSION OR THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE]
UM, IN OUR PURVIEW.IS THERE A MOTION THAT WE ADJOURN? WELL, THANK YOU.
AND, UM, MS. LUCAS, I'LL TAKE YOUR SECOND.
I LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING YOU GUYS NEXT MONTH.
HAVE A GOOD NIGHT GUYS TONIGHT.