Sep 13, 2023 Planning & Zoning Commission

THAT GOES TOO MUCH.

[00:00:01]

[1. CALL TO ORDER]

PLANNING, ZONING, COMMISSION IS CALLED TO ORDER.

UM, ALL COMMISSIONERS ARE PRESENT.

WE HAVE NOBODY ABSENT TONIGHT.

UM, WE'LL BE GONE.

ITEM THREE,

[a. Consider approving the minutes of the August 9, 2023, Planning and Zon...]

? YES? YES.

I HAVE A MOTION.

AND SECOND.

EVERYBODY CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE.

MOTION CARRIES.

MOVING ON.

COMMISSION REPORTS.

[4. COMMISSION REPORTS]

UH, ANY OTHER COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY REPORTS? YES, SIR.

MARK.

UM, VERY QUICKLY, I DID WANT TO, UM, ACKNOWLEDGE A YOUNG MAN NAMED ALEX.

HE IS IN THE AUDIENCE AND HE AND HIS MOM HAD REACHED OUT INTERESTED IN CIVIC ENGAGEMENT IN THE PROCESS.

UM, I TOLD HIM ALL I HAD TO OFFER WAS PLANNING AND ZONING WHEN HE REACHED OUT.

UM, BUT IT'S IMPORTANT AND, UH, GOOD TO SEE FOLKS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN HOW GOVERNMENT WORKS.

SO I JUST WANTED TO SAY THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING.

THANK YOU.

ANYBODY ELSE? UH, MOVING ON THEN.

STAFF REPORTS, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.

[a. Development Services]

THANK YOU.

ENGINEERING.

[b. Engineering]

AND WE DO EXPECT IT TO BE ADOPTED NEXT MONDAY, WHERE, UH, WE'RE TAKING IT TO COUNCIL FOR THE FINAL READING.

VERY GOOD.

THANK YOU.

UH, MOVING ON.

UH,

[6. PUBLIC COMMENT]

THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR ANYBODY IN THE PUBLIC TO COMMENT, UH, ON AN ITEM THAT IS TYPICALLY NOT ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT.

WE HAVE ONE PERSON WHO SIGNED UP TO SPEAK MR. WILLIAM CRONIN.

HE ALSO PROVIDED HIS COMMENTS THAT WE'LL PASS DOWN TO YOU.

OKAY.

AND WE DO, UH, LIMIT THE COMMENTS TO THREE MINUTES, PLEASE.

UH, GOOD EVENING BOARD MEMBERS.

UM, MY NAME IS WILLIAM PRO AND I LIVE ON 9 0 2 PINE MEADOW DRIVE IN MISSOURI CITY, UH, NEAR THE BELTWAY EIGHT 90 DEVELOPMENT.

UH, I DON'T KNOW IF THIS PERTAINS TO YOU.

I'M GONNA READ THE LITTLE LETTER THAT I, THAT I WROTE UP BEFORE I CAME HERE.

I'M NOT SURE IF THIS FALLS UNDER YOUR PURVIEW.

HOWEVER, I AM HERE HOPING TO FIND AN UPDATE ON THE PROGRESS OF DRAINAGE ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT AND PROGRESS TOWARD ACHIEVING RESOLUTION TO PROVIDE AN UPGRADE TO DRAINAGE IN THE PINE MEADOW SUBDIVISION.

I AND OTHER RESIDENTS MET WITH THE PUBLIC HORSE DIRECTOR AND OTHER PRINCIPALS IN FEBRUARY OF THIS YEAR ABOUT RECEIVING C D B G, UH, M I T FUNDING FOR THE PROJECT.

I BELIEVE THE FUNDING WAS APPROVED AND UNDERSTOOD THAT ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT WOULD BEGIN IN AUGUST, AND THAT WE RESIDENTS WOULD BE INFORMED OF THE PROGRESS.

WHILE I DO UNDERSTAND THAT THIS PROJECT COULD TAKE SOME TIME TO COMPLETE, I'M CONCERNED ABOUT THE PRESENT DEVELOPMENT ONGOING IN THE SUBDIVISION AND HOW HEAVY RAIN EVENTS MAKE CAN AFFECT SOME OF THE HOMES WITH THE WITHOUT PROPER DRAINAGE.

UM, SO THIS PARTICULAR, UH, C B D G MONEY WAS APPROPRIATE, LIKE $5 MILLION.

TWO, TWO AND A HALF OR 2.2 WAS APPROPRIATE FOR, UM, UH, MCLEAN MCLEAN DEVELOPMENT.

OKAY.

AND THE OTHER WAS ASSIGNED TO, UH, SUBDIVISION, UH, PINE MEADOW SUBDIVISION.

SO I'M JUST REALLY ASKING, AND I SENT SOME LETTERS TO JOI AND TO THE REPRESENTATIVE FOR, 'CAUSE WE DON'T HAVE AN H O A, THERE'S NO H O A SO COMMUNICATION.

SO I'M WONDERING, UH, WHERE THE PROGRESS IS ON THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT.

UM, IF YOU, IF YOU KNOW, OR IF ANYONE CAN ANSWER THAT, I DO KNOW, AM I ALLOWED TO RESPOND? IT USED TO SAY IN HERE THAT WE'RE NOT REALLY ALLOWED TO RESPOND, BUT IF, IF IT'S A SHORT ANSWER, IT IS A SHORT ANSWER.

UH, THE FUNDING IS STILL UNDER REVIEW BY THE G L O AND WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED APPROVAL AT THIS TIME.

WE ANTICIPATE APPROVAL, UH, HOWEVER, G L O IS STILL REVIEWING THE DOCUMENTATION.

OKAY.

ALL RIGHT.

WELL, THAT'S FAIR ENOUGH.

OKAY.

AND I'LL WAIT TO HEAR IF I HEAR SOME S THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

OKAY, WE'LL MOVE ON THEN.

UH, TO ITEM SEVEN,

[a. CONSENT AGENDA]

NUMBER ONE, CONSIDER AN APPLICATION OF REVISED COMP CONCEPT PLAN FOR CNA THREE H.

NUMBER TWO, CONSIDER AN APPLICATION OF A REVISED CONCEPT PLAN FOR CNA FOUR B.

[00:05:01]

NUMBER FOUR, CONSIDER AN APPLICATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLATT OF PARKWAY CROSSWAY CROSSINGS DETENTION.

NUMBER FIVE, CONSIDER AN APPLICATION OF A FINAL PLATT OF MISSOURI CITY PARK AND BUILDING MAINTENANCE FACILITY.

NUMBER SIX, CONSIDER AN APPLICATION OF A FINAL PLATT OF PARKWAY CROSSING.

NUMBER SEVEN, CONSIDER AN APPLICATION OF A FINAL PLATT OF SIENNA RETAIL CENTER.

AND NUMBER EIGHT, CONSIDER AN APPLICATION OF A FINAL PLATT OF SIENNA, SECTION 54.

ANY DISCUSSIONS OR MOTION? WE HAVE A MOTION BY MR. GRIFFIN.

MR. CHAIRMAN, I MOVE THAT WE, UH, ADOPT ALL, AND WE HAVE A SECOND BY MR. SOLOWAY.

GO AHEAD AND CAST YOUR VOTES, PLEASE.

UH, MOTION CARRIES.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

MOVING ON.

[a. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT]

A PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENT FOR OR AGAINST A REQUEST BY MONICA FONTANO.

POINDEXTER CHESTERFIELD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES FOR A PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ON AN APPROXIMATE POINT.

THREE FOUR ACRES OF LAND TO ALLOW FOR THE LOCATION OF OFFICE WAREHOUSES AND LC.

TWO LOCAL RETAIL DISTRICT USES.

GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS.

OKAY, BEING HANDED OUT IS, UM, A CHANGE IN THE CONCEPT PLAN BY THE APPLICANT THAT WAS JUST SUBMITTED TODAY.

UM, AND WE'LL GO OVER THAT AT THE END OF MY PRESENTATION.

SO THE COMMENTS THAT I PROVIDE NOW ARE IN REGARDS TO THE FIRST SITE PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED.

OKAY.

BEFORE YOU, IS A REQUEST FOR A PLAN DEVELOPMENT, UH, DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR OFFICE WAREHOUSE USE.

UH, THE SITE IS LOCATED ON ROTH, ON ROTHWELL STREET.

UM, THE TWO SITES ARE 1923 AND 1927 ROTHWELL STREET.

THE APPLICANT HAS ADVISED THAT DEVELOPMENTS WILL BE COMPLETED WITHIN THE REQUIRED FIVE YEARS.

OKAY.

THIS IS, UM, PICTURES OF THE FIRST SITE PLANS THAT WERE SUBMITTED, WHICH SHOWS TWO, UH, OFFICE WAREHOUSES, BOTH AT 4,000 SQUARE FEET.

THE OFFICE WAREHOUSE WILL LOCATE A RETAIL, ONLINE RETAIL, UM, BUSINESS, AS WELL AS PROVIDE STORAGE FOR THE PRODUCTS ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

THE PROPOSED, UH, DEVELOPMENT PD DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF 2017.

UM, AND FOR THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, THE, UH, FUTURE LAND USE MAP SEES IT AS A SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER.

DISTRICT STAFF RECOMMENDS DISAPPROVAL OF THE WAREHOUSE USE.

THE CURRENT ZONING IS LC TWO, WHICH DOES ALLOW FOR OFFICE USE.

THE PD WILL ALLOW FOR THE WAREHOUSE PORTION OF THE USE, WHICH IS NOT, UH, PERMITTED IN LC LC TWO CURRENTLY ON DEVIATIONS WITH HEIGHT AND AREA REGULATIONS OF SECTION SEVEN POINT 11 POINT C.

THE PROPOSED, UH, SITE PLAN DOES DEVIATE FROM THE SETBACKS THAT ARE REQUIRED IN LC TWO ZONING.

UH, THEY PROPOSE TO REDUCE THE SETBACKS.

STAFF RECOMMENDS DISAPPROVAL OF THE SETBACKS.

UM, THE PROPOSAL TO HAVE SETBACKS IS JUST AN ADDITIONAL, UM, REASON FOR DISAPPROVAL, SORRY TO HAVE A WAREHOUSE OF THAT SIZE IN THAT LOCATION ON ROTHWELL STREET.

UH, THE SITE PLAN ALSO DEPICTED THE LOCATION OF TRASH DISPOSAL, UM, AREA IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING SITE, WHICH, UH, TRASH DISPOSAL REGULATIONS OF, UH, SECTION NINE POINT 14 REQUIRES THAT TRASH DISPOSALS ARE LOCATED ON THE SIDE OR REAR OF DEVELOPMENTS, NON-RESIDENTIAL, UM, DEVELOPMENTS.

OKAY.

ON LANDSCAPING REGULATIONS, THERE AREN'T ANY DEVIATIONS FROM LANDSCAPING.

HOWEVER, THE SITE PLAN THAT PROPOSED SETBACK, UM, REDUCTIONS AND PARKING AREA PAVEMENTS, UM, ON THE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, DOES NOT PROVIDE THE REQUIRED AREA THAT, UM, FOR THE TRANSITIONAL BUFFY YARD AND FOR LANDSCAPING

[00:10:01]

AND FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS, UH, ALL DRIVEWAYS, INCLUDING LOCATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE.

UM, DESIGN MANUAL, A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WAS NOT REQUIRED FOR THIS, UM, FOR THIS PROPOSAL.

AND IT WAS NOT SUBMITTED BEFORE.

YOU, AGAIN, IS A, UM, ANOTHER OPTION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS JUST SUBMITTED, UH, TO PROPOSE ONE WAREHOUSE ON THE SITE VERSUS TWO WAREHOUSES.

AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, THE APPLICANT IS HERE IN THE AUDIENCE TONIGHT.

THANK YOU.

THANK THAT.

COMPLETES MY PRESENTATION.

OKAY.

UM, I'M NOT SURE HOW TO PROCEED, JENNIFER, WHAT IS PUBLIC CARE? OKAY.

BUT, OKAY.

WE HAVE ONE PERSON WHO HAS SIGNED UP TO MAKE PUBLIC COMMENTS.

OKAY.

UH, LET'S, LET'S HEAR FROM THE PUBLIC FIRST AND THEN WE'LL DISCUSS THE WAY FORWARD.

HER NAME IS MONICA .

THIS WAS THE APPLICANT? MM-HMM.

? YES.

NO, THIS IS THE COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC.

SHE'S THE, THIS IS THE APPLICANT.

OH, SHE'S THE APPLICANT.

YES, SHE'S THE APPLICANT.

OKAY.

GOOD.

GO AHEAD, COME FORWARD.

THANK YOU.

GOOD EVENING.

GOOD EVENING.

I'M MONICA FONTANO POINDEXTER.

I AM THE APPLICANT.

I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAVE MY SLIDES.

IF SO, I'D LIKE TO GO THROUGH THEM BRIEFLY.

SO INITIALLY THE OWNER WANTED TO DO TWO WAREHOUSES SIDE BY SIDE, BUT IN LIEU OF THE SETBACK LINES, I WAS HIRED TO DO THE PLAT.

MY PLATT HAS ALL OF THE SETBACKS.

SO I WANNA START OFF THE TOP THAT WE'LL.

WE'LL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL OF THE SETBACKS THAT WILL HAPPEN.

OKAY.

AND, UM, IN ADDITION, WHEN IT COMES TO THE DUMPSTER, WE WILL ALSO, UM, THERE WILL NOT BE A DUMPSTER IN THE FRONT OF THIS NEW, UH, PROPOSAL.

SO I DON'T KNOW IF YOU, YOU HAVE IT.

UH, BUT ANYWAY, ALSO WE'LL BE IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ANY LANDSCAPE PLANS, I BELIEVE IN THE ORDINANCE AND FOLLOWING THE ORDINANCE TO THE LETTER.

AND SO I DID MEET WITH THE, UH, DESIGNER, AND THEY REVISED THE SITE PLAN.

THEY WILL HAVE A, A WAREHOUSE, AND ACTUALLY IT'S AN OFFICE WITH THE WAREHOUSE.

IT'S IN ADDITION TO A WAREHOUSE.

IT'S ALSO A WORK AREA.

SO THEY HAVE AN ONLINE BUSINESS.

THE OWNER LIVES DOWN THE STREET.

THEY HAVE AN ONLINE BUSINESS WHERE THEY CAN WALK DOWN TO THEIR PHYSICAL OFFICE AND THEY WILL WORK FROM THERE.

AND THEN THEY WILL HAVE A AREA, A WORK AREA WILL ALLOW THEM TO BOX AND BAG THINGS THAT THEY CAN TAKE TO SHIP TO THE, THE PER PEOPLE WHO MADE PURCHASES.

AND SO THAT'S HOW THEY INTEND TO USE IT.

SO LC TWO DOES ALLOW FOR OFFICE SPACE, BUT THEIR OFFICE IS AN ACTUAL PHYSICAL OFFICE WITH A DESK.

AND THEN THE OTHER PORTION, THE LARGE SPACE IS A WORKSPACE IN ADDITION TO A WAREHOUSE THAT WILL HOLD SOME OF THOSE ITEMS BEFORE THEY GO, UH, TO SHIPPING.

SO THE PROPERTY ITSELF IS ON ROTHWELL, WHICH IS JUST OFF OF FIFTH STREET BETWEEN INDEPENDENCE AND, UM, I'M DRAWING A BLANK.

SO IT'S, IT'S VERY NEARBY.

AND SO IF YOU HAVE MY SHEETS, YOU'LL SEE THAT CALVARY INDIAN CHURCH IS ON THE CORNER OF FIFTH STREET IN ROTHWELL.

RIGHT ACROSS FROM THERE IS A HOME.

ACROSS FROM THERE IS SOME VACANT LAND, WHICH IS NEXT DOOR TO MY OWNER'S VACANT LAND, WHICH IS NEXT DOOR TO SEVERAL RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES WHERE PEOPLE ARE ACTUALLY DOING SOME AUTOMOTIVE, UH, UH, REPAIRS ON AT LEAST TWO OF THOSE SITES.

AND THE STREET IS NOT LONG, IT'S ABOUT A BLOCK LENGTH, AND AT THE END OF THE STREET AT DEAD ENDS.

AND THEN ON THE OTHER SIDE, THERE'S, UM, A ROTHWELL PLANT FOR THE, UM, WATER.

SO, UM, OUR CONTENTION IS THAT THE OWNER WOULD LIKE TO USE THIS SPACE.

HE BOUGHT IT WITH THE INTENTION OF PLACING HIS OFFICE THERE.

AND SO IT WILL BE A OFFICE AND I, AND IN ADDITION TO THE WAREHOUSE AND THAT WAREHOUSE, IT'S NOT JUST A WAREHOUSE, IT'S A BIG OPEN SPACE THAT WILL STORE THOSE ITEMS. AND THEY WILL ALSO USE THAT AREA TO PACKAGE THEM AS THEY'RE SENDING THEM TO THE PEOPLE WHO MADE PURCHASES.

DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME? I'D BE GLAD TO ANSWER THEM.

ANY QUESTIONS? YEAH, JUST A QUICK ONE.

UM, AND I THINK YOU SAID YOU WERE REPRESENTING THOSE WHO WERE, UM, HAD THE BUSINESS.

WAS THERE ANY

[00:15:01]

WE HAVE ONE OF THE OWNERS WHO'S A RESIDENT WHO'S ON EITHER SIDE, WILL BE, IS HERE TONIGHT, AND SO IS THE OWNER.

THEY'RE BOTH, UM, HERE TONIGHT.

AND SO, UM, AND NO, HE DIDN'T HAVE ANY PROBLEM WITH THE, UH, GOTCHA.

WITH THE PROJECT BEING THERE.

SO ACROSS THE STREET FROM THAT, IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT MY, UH, MY SLIDES ACROSS THE STREET, AS YOU CAN SEE, IT'S DENSELY WOODED.

AND, UH, AND WHEN YOU GET TO THE END OF IT, YOU DO SEE THAT, UH, CHURCH, WHICH LOOKS SIMILAR TO, UM, OUR SPACE.

AND THEN ON THE OTHER SIDE, THERE ARE A FEW HOMES.

SO IT'S NOT A LOT OF HOUSES IN THAT AREA.

IT'S A VERY SHORT STREET.

IT'S NOT GOING TO BE, UH, CONTINUED THROUGH.

SO, UM, A LOT WOULD HAVE TO HAPPEN TO MAKE THAT A THROUGH STREET .

I KNOW, I GOT IT.

AND JUST SO I'M CLEAR, YOU SAID THE OWNER LIVES ON EITHER SIDE OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING? UM, SO THE OWNER LIVES, UM, YEAH.

FURTHER DOWN, UH, THE STREET ON, UH, ON ROTHWELL.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

ANY, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK TONIGHT.

OKAY.

SO AS THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING, IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER O'MALLEY.

OH, I'M SORRY.

CAN I SPEAK IN REGARDS TO THIS, UH, DEVELOPMENT? YES.

COME FORWARD, PLEASE WITHDRAW MY MOTION.

OKAY.

IT MAY NOT BE POSSIBLE.

GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE.

MY NAME IS YAPA WILSON.

UH, I LIVE ON ROTHWELL STREET.

I JUST BUILT MY HOUSE ON ROTHWELL, ACTUALLY JUST, UH, MAYBE THREE LOTS DOWN.

I'VE OWNED PROPERTY ON ROTHWELL.

1933 ROTHWELL IS MY ADDRESS.

SO TOWARDS FIFTH STREET FROM THIS DEVELOPMENT? NO, TOWARDS THE, THE WATER TOWER.

OH, OKAY.

YEAH.

TOWARDS THE END OF THE STREET.

YEAH.

I'VE OWNED PROPERTY ON THERE FOR ABOUT SEVEN, EIGHT YEARS NOW.

AND IT'S A DEAD ZONE, REALLY.

IT'S, THERE'S ONLY THREE HOUSES ON THE WHOLE STREET.

ONE OF THEM IS MINE.

UH, IT'S JUST EMPTY EYESORE REALLY IS WHAT IT IS.

DUMP SITES PRETTY MUCH.

SO I WELCOME ANY DEVELOPMENT THAT CAN COME ON THE STREET.

UH, AS HE SAYS, HE IS WILLING TO DO ONE WAREHOUSE RATHER THAN TWO.

UH, BUT YEAH, WE WOULD WELCOME THE DEVELOPMENT BECAUSE THE, IT'S JUST A LOT OF EMPTY LOTS, REALLY.

IT'S A DEAD END STREET WITH A LOT OF EMPTY LOTS.

SO WE HAVE NO OBJECTION TO HIM COMING IN THERE AND BUILDING ANYTHING.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR COMMENTS.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

ALRIGHT, JENNIFER, JUST I HAVE A QUICK QUESTION.

UH, SHE SAID THAT THE SETBACK ISSUE WILL BE RESOLVED.

THE LANDSCAPING PIECE WILL BE RESOLVED.

THERE'S NO OTHER ISSUES IF THEY LET'S, UH, CLOSE THE POD HEARING AND WE'LL HAVE THE DISCUSSION.

UH, WE HAVE A MOTION TO CLOSE, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING BY COMMISSIONER MALLEY.

AND WE DON'T HAVE A SECOND YET, ALTHOUGH, WELL, WE DO, BUT IT DIDN'T SHOW UP.

DIDN'T SHOW UP.

, GO AHEAD AND CAST YOUR VOTES PLEASE, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

UH, MOTION CARRIES.

OKAY.

OW.

NOW JENNIFER, HAVE A DISCUSSION.

OKAY.

SO ON THE SCREEN, IT IS A SITE PLAN I PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FOR ONE OF THE LOTS.

SO, UM, REMEMBER THERE'S TWO LOTS SIDE BY SIDE.

SO THE CHANGE THAT THEY MADE WAS, INSTEAD OF PUTTING TWO 4,000 SQUARE FEET BUILDINGS ON EACH LOT, THEY WOULD COMBINE IT INTO ONE LOT.

AND SO THAT'S WHAT THE SLIDE IS DEPICTING.

HOWEVER, IT STILL LOOKS TIGHT.

SO I KNOW THAT WE HEARD ALL SETBACKS, ALL LANDSCAPING WOULD BE MET.

UNDERSTAND THAT ON YOUR LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS, UM, FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, IT REQUIRES 20 FEET FROM THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE INTO THE PROPERTY, NOT COUNTING THE RIGHT OF WAY, NOT COUNTING ANY GREEN SPACE OR ANYTHING, YOU KNOW, WITHIN A RIGHT OF WAY, 20 FEET ON THE PRIVATE SIDE.

SO IF YOU LOOK FROM THE LEFT OF THIS SCREEN WHERE THAT LINE IS ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY, WHERE ALL THAT PAVEMENT IS, AND SO IT'S SHOWING DIMENSIONS OF, UM, I BELIEVE, RIGHT.

SO YEAH, SO 20 FEET OF THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO BE GREEN SPACE LANDSCAPING.

AND SO THAT'S ONE OF THE TRANSITIONAL BUFFER YARD REQUIREMENTS.

THE OTHER, UH, CONDITION AROUND, UH, 30 FEET SETBACK FROM ROTHWELL IS REQUIRED FOR THE BUILDING SETBACK 25 FEET FROM THE REAR.

THE BACKSIDE IS REQUIRED FOR THE BUILDING SETBACK.

AND THEN, UH, L C TWO ALLOWS, UM, I BELIEVE 10 FEET, UH, BETWEEN THE SIDE PROPERTY LINES.

[00:20:01]

UM, AND THEN, UH, THERE MAY BE OTHER REQUIREMENTS.

UM, AND I'LL LET, UH, MARCUS, UH, CHIME IN, UM, ON THAT AS WELL.

UH, DETENTION WOULD'VE TO BE MANAGED ON SITE FOR THIS PROPERTY.

UH, THE REGIONAL DETENTION BASIN IS ESTIMATED TO BE AT CAPACITY.

UH, THERE IS CURRENTLY NO IDENTIFIED SPACE FOR DETENTION ON THIS SITE THAT I CAN SEE FROM THE PROVIDED DOCUMENTS.

AND SO YOU DO HAVE FLEXIBILITY WITH THE PD TO ALLOW FOR DEVIATIONS.

UM, BUT UNDERSTAND, AND, AND DEFINITELY TAKE THE POINT IN TERMS OF THE CONDITIONS ON ROTHWELL.

UM, HOWEVER, OFFICE WAREHOUSE AS CONSIDERED BY LIKE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, UM, IS MORE CONDUCIVE TO SOME OF THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARES FM 10 92, UM, PORTIONS ALONG, UH, FIFTH STREET.

UH, BUT NOT NECESSARILY THOSE SIDE STREETS OFF OF, UM, FIFTH STREET.

SO THE POSITIONING OF THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT OFF OF ROTHWELL MAY NOT BE, UM, APPROPRIATELY SUITED.

AND IT'S A LOT OF SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT THEY'RE, THEY'RE CHARGED TO ESTABLISHED THERE.

SO ALL THE, THE LOTS ACROSS THE STREET, WHAT ARE THEY ZONED FOR RIGHT NOW? ACROSS WA, ROTHWELL STREET? YEAH.

ALL THE, THE C TWO.

YOU CAN SEE 'EM, THERE'S ALL EMPTY RIGHT NOW.

OH C THREE ACTUALLY MM-HMM.

.

AND SO, AND THIS IS A SITUATION OF ALL OF, SO ALL OF THOSE REDS ARE, UH, COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS.

THE LIGHTER RED IS LC THREE, SO THAT'S THE REGIONAL COMMERCIAL.

UM, THE DARKER RED IS O C TWO MORE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL.

AND THEN YOU SEE THE YELLOW R TWO.

UM, SO I KNOW, UH, THESE TWO LOTS WOULD FALL UNDER THAT DARKER RED, THE LC TWO, UM, ALL OF THESE WERE ZONED WITH THE ORIGINAL ZONING ORDINANCE IN 1981.

MM-HMM.

.

UM, SO WHAT IT ESSENTIALLY IS, IS THE RESIDENTIAL USES ARE CONSIDERED NON-CONFORMING, UM, USES ANY NEW DEVELOPMENT WOULD HAVE TO BE BROUGHT UP TO WHAT THE ZONING IS.

HOWEVER, ALL OF THAT FIFTH STREET AREA HAS BEEN ZONED THAT WAY.

SO IS IT APPROPRIATE, YOU KNOW, FOR, UH, THE LC TWO, LC THREE, UM, ALONG ROTHWELL STREET? I WILL SAY, AND IT MAY BE, UH, TO THE HOME THAT WAS, UH, CONSTRUCTED, THAT WAS JUST MENTIONED.

THE R TWO WAS A REZONING THAT OCCURRED, UH, WITHIN THE LAST 10 YEARS OR SO TO ALLOW FOR A HOME TO BE RECONSTRUCTED ON ROTHWELL STREET.

UM, SO EVEN THE R TWO, THERE WAS LC TWO, I BELIEVE, UM, UP UNTIL THAT POINT THAT IT WAS REZONED TO R TWO, TO R TWO, WHICH IS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

WELL, SO MY QUESTION WAS GONNA BE, UM, WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION TO, TO, TO ADDRESS THIS THING OTHER THAN TO, TO DENY THE APPLICATION AS SUBMITTED.

OKAY.

THAT'S WHERE I AM.

OKAY.

BECAUSE WE DON'T KNOW, UM, YOU KNOW, THERE'S NO DETAILED SITE PLAN HERE.

SO WE KNOW WHAT THE SETBACKS ARE.

UM, AND, AND, UM, THAT, THAT'S MY MAIN CONCERN.

I I, I DON'T FEEL LIKE I CAN VOTE ON THIS THING THAT WAS JUST HANDED TO ME.

I DON'T, I'M ASSUMING, BUT PROBABLY, UM, THAT'S WHERE I AM TOO.

YEAH.

WOULD THEY HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO KIND OF COMPLY AND COMPLY MIGHT BE TOO STRONG A WORD? I DON'T KNOW.

BUT YOU GET IT WHERE IT NEEDS TO BE.

I MEAN, IT, YEAH, I, I, I, OKAY.

OKAY.

SO SET FOR, IT WAS SET FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TODAY FOR THE COMMISSION TO HEAR, UH, THE APPLICATE THE APPLICATION.

SO AT THIS POINT, IT IS LEGAL'S DETERMINATION THAT IT SHOULD BE THAT THE REPORT SHOULD BE FORWARDED TO COUNSEL FOR THEIR ACTION WITH EITHER A POSITIVE OR A NEGATIVE RECOMMENDATION.

THANK YOU.

CAN THIS BUILDING BE BUILT ON THOSE TWO LOTS KNOWING THAT THERE'S NO DRAINAGE, IT HAS TO BE DONE ON SITE.

THE SETBACKS 20 FEET, 30 FEET IN THE BACK, 10 SIDE.

I MEAN THAT THE NUMBER'S THROWN OUT UP.

THAT'S, THAT'S NOT EVEN A VALID QUESTION.

WELL, THE REASON I THINK IT'S VALID IS WE CAN GIVE A NEGATIVE RECOMMENDATION, BUT THE HOME, THE PROPERTY OWNERS HERE GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD.

IS IT FEASIBLE THAT IT COULD EVEN BE BUILT? OKAY.

WELL, I MEAN, I, I, I FEEL LIKE THEY'VE KIND OF DONE THAT STEP YET AND, AND TWICE, BUT THEY STILL HAVEN'T.

BUT THEY HAVEN'T CRITERIA, THEY HAVEN'T PROVIDED ENOUGH DETAIL FOR US TO, TO EVALUATE.

YEAH.

AND STAFF HASN'T SEEN THIS TO EVALUATE AND, AND, YOU KNOW, PUBLIC WORKS HASN'T SEEN IT TO EVALUATE.

YEAH.

UH, SO I MEAN, IT'S, I THINK IT'S VALID TO ASK THE QUESTION, BUT I'M NOT SURE

[00:25:01]

UNLESS, UNLESS IT'S JUST TOTALLY LUDICROUS TO THINK THAT, THAT THEY CAN DO IT.

I WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO PROVIDE AN ANSWER, WHICH ISN'T HEAVILY CAVEATED.

SO YEAH, I, I WOULD REQUIRE MORE INFORMATION TO MAKE A FIRM DETERMINATION.

AND I THINK ALL OF US DO.

AND THAT'S WHY I ASKED THE QUESTION, IS THAT THERE'S NO WAY THAT, WHEN I LOOK AT JUST THE FUNDAMENTAL GUIDELINES ON SETBACK ALONE, AND THEN YOU ADDED A DETENTION, I LOVE THE AMBITION.

I LOVE, I DRIVE THAT STREET EVERY DAY.

I'D LOVE TO HAVE SOMETHING NEW AND SOMEBODY INVESTING THEIR DOLLARS AND IS THIS THE RIGHT ONE? I DON'T KNOW, BUT I JUST DON'T LET THAT BE.

SO, SO JENNIFER, UH, ASIDE FROM THE TECHNICAL ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PLAN, THE, THE STICKING POINT SEEMS TO BE THE, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE, AND THE, THE WAREHOUSE SHOES.

RIGHT.

OKAY.

UM, I, I, IT DIDN'T, IT DIDN'T REGISTER TO ME THAT ACROSS THE STREETS LC THREE THOUGH, WHICH LEADS ME TO BELIEVE THAT, THAT THIS KIND OF USE ACROSS THE STREET FROM THAT MAY BE ACCEPTABLE.

WELL, WELL, WAREHOUSE USE IS PERMITTED IN L C FOUR.

YEAH.

SO IT, BUT TO ME, THERE'S, THERE'S WAREHOUSES AND THEN THERE'S WAREHOUSES, RIGHT.

AND OBVIOUSLY THIS IS A VERY SMALL SCALE SITUATION.

SO AGAIN, I DON'T THINK I HAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION TO REALLY MAKE THAT DETERMINATION AT THIS POINT.

AND THE, THE LEGAL'S KIND OF GIVEN US THE DIRECTION THAT WE ONLY GET ONE CHOICE HERE.

WE EITHER APPROVE IT OR DISAPPROVE IT.

SO PROVE THE DENY.

THAT'S WHAT I'M GETTING.

OKAY.

SO ANY, I'LL MAKE A MOTION, OTHER DISCUSSION.

YOU WOULD BE APPROVING STAFF'S NEGATIVE RECOMMENDATION, BUT IT STILL NEEDS TO GO COUNSEL.

ABSOLUTELY.

I'M, I'M, I'M A LITTLE, UM, ANOTHER QUESTION, MAYBE I'M A LITTLE MIXED HERE.

WE WE'RE, WE'RE, IF THE APPLICANT WERE TO WITHDRAW THE APPLICATION, WOULD THAT BE A BETTER SOLUTION AND START OVER IT AND DO THAT AFTER WE THEY COULD, THEY CAN DO THAT AFTER WE VOTE, AND THEN IT JUST WOULDN'T GO TO CITY COUNCIL.

RIGHT? YEAH.

RIGHT.

WE'VE SEEN THAT THAT WOULD, UH, SPEED UP THE PROCESS.

YES.

IF YOU GET ABSOLUTELY.

THEY NEED TO WORK ON IT MORE.

THEY CONCLUDE, COME BACK.

MY MY TAKEAWAY IS THAT THE APPLICANT IS WILLING, THEY WILL SUBMIT A NEW APPLICATION, TRY TO DO WHAT THEY CAN TO MAKE IT WORK.

YES.

AND, AND I WOULD LIKE TO GIVE THEM THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO THAT.

OKAY.

ABSOLUTELY.

BUT WE CAN'T, WE CAN'T JUDGE IT BASED ON WHAT WE HAVE RIGHT NOW.

RIGHT.

OKAY.

I'M GONNA AGREE WITH THAT.

SO, UM, MR. MALLEY, HOW DO WE BENEFIT THAT? HOW WE MAKE IT HAPPEN? WELL, JUST WHAT LEGAL SAID WE'RE, WE'RE GOING TO, WE'RE GOING TO VOTE ON THE, THE REPORT AS IT STANDS, AND, UM, THEN THE APPLICANT CAN DECIDE WHAT THEY WANNA DO AFTER THAT.

SO MR. O'MALLEY HAS MADE A MOTION TO SUBMIT THIS, UH, NEGATIVE RECOMMENDATION TO CITY THE COUNCIL.

AND I SECOND LOOKS LIKE MR. OH, OKAY.

IT'S NOT SHOWING UP ON MY THING TO SAY THAT THE SECOND HAS BEEN REGISTERED.

OKAY.

NOW, UM, EVERYBODY GO AHEAD AND CAST YOUR VOTE PLEASE.

AND THE MOTION CARRIES.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

AND LET'S GO BACK TO THE AGENDA.

SEE THAT WE ARE UP NO, UH, NO ZONING TAX AMENDMENTS TONIGHT.

OH, WAIT, WAIT, WAIT, WAIT, WAIT.

WE'VE GOT, OKAY.

YEAH, WE'VE GOT THE, THE ITEM B ZONING

[b. ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS - SIENNA MUD NO. 2]

AND IT WASN'T REGISTERED.

YEAH.

SO IT, IT SHOWED MY VOTE BEING A YES.

YES.

YOU HAVE THE FLOOR.

[00:30:02]

SO WE ARE HERE TODAY TO, UM, LOOK AT THE DIFFERENT TOOLS THAT WE AND YOUR STAFF .

YEAH.

CAN YOU HELP US, UM, THE CORRECT PRESENTATION WHILE THEY'RE LOADING THAT? NO, YOU'RE GOOD.

I CAN FILL UP TIME.

I, UM, THE, GOING BACK TO THAT LAST ISSUE, JUST BECAUSE I HEARD THE WORD NEW FOR THE FIRST TIME, AND FROM OUR SPECIAL MEETING, THE UNCON CONFORM PART THAT YOU MENTIONED, THAT THAT WHOLE AREA IS A PART OF, IS, I JUST HAD IT, IS THE NEW, I GUESS, LAW NOW, SSB 9 29.

DOES THAT HAVE ANY IMPACT ON THAT? SO WE CAN'T DISCUSS THAT RIGHT NOW.

OH, OKAY.

I'M SORRY, , I WAS JUST CURIOUS 'CAUSE I HEARD THE WORD.

I KNOW I , BUT WE'LL, WE'LL FOLLOW UP.

COOL.

SO COMMISSIONER, WHILE THE DO THAT PRESENTATION'S BEING, UH, RE RELOADED, UH, I JUST WANTED TO SAY THAT WE ALL AWARE OF THE RECENT, UH, ANNEXATION OF MUD DIS OF SIENNA MUD DISTRICT TWO AND TWO, THE CITY PROPER.

AND WITH THAT SAID, WE ARE, UH, THE PLANNING, UH, I MEAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND OTHER CITY STAFF ARE DOING A, UH, ANALYSIS OF THE LAND AND HOW WE CAN ENSURE THAT THE LAND, UH, IN IMPLEMENTING, UH, MAKE SURE THAT THE LAND USE CONTROLS ARE BEING IMPLEMENTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH OUR CITY'S REGULATIONS.

YES.

SO DURING THE PRESENTATION, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, YOU CAN STOP ME IN, IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PRESENTATION OR, UH, AT THE END.

BUT WE ARE, ARE ASKING FOR, UH, AT THIS TIME, NO, UH, ACTION IS NEEDED.

WE, THIS IS JUST FOR DISCUSSION TO MAKE THE PUBLIC AND THE COMMISSION AWARE OF THE ANALYSIS THAT WE ARE DOING CURRENTLY NOW.

AND NEXT MONTH WE WILL GO INTO A MORE DEEPER ANALYSIS.

SO, UH, THE BACKGROUND OF THIS, UH, PRESENTATION THAT FIRST ON AUGUST 21ST, THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED AN ORDINANCE TO FULLY ANNEX CIENA MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NUMBER TWO AREA INTO THE CITY LIMITS.

UPON THAT ANNEXATION, WE HAVE GIVEN THE CITY HAD APP APPRO ALSO APPROVED WITHIN THAT N STATION TO CLASSIFY THE ENTIRE AREA AS SUBURBAN DISTRICT ZONING.

SO TONIGHT WE ARE GOING TO, UH, TALK ABOUT THE PROCESS FOR THE PERMANENT ZONING FOR ALL OF THE SUBJECT AREA.

SO TONIGHT IS JUST A DISCUSSION PURPOSE ONLY.

SO FIRST I WOULD LIKE TO, TO TALK ABOUT, UH, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

I HAVE, I HAVE A QUESTION.

YES.

THIS LAND IS ALL, UH, A LOT OF THIS LAND IS ALREADY DEVELOPED, RIGHT? CORRECT.

AND IT'S GOT SOME ZONING DESIGNATION.

NO, SO, SO NOT, NOT OFFICIALLY.

RIGHT.

AND SO BRIAN, BRIAN WILL TOUCH ON SOME OF THE LAND USE CONTROLS.

ALRIGHT, I'M GETTING AHEAD OF MYSELF.

UM, BUT, BUT IT, COMING OUT OF THE E T J INTO THE CITY LIMITS, E T J ZONING DOES NOT APPLY.

UM, SO COMING INTO THE CITY LIMITS, WE NEED TO ASSIGN A ZONING DESIGNATION FOR IT.

YEAH.

SO WHEN WE ARE ASSIGNING THAT ZONING

[00:35:01]

SO THOSE THREE SUBDIVISIONS ARE WITHIN, WITHIN, AND ALSO OUTSIDE OF THE MUD DIS OF THE MUD DISTRICT TWO.

SO WITHIN MUD DISTRICT TWO, THIS IS A MAP SHOWCASING THE PARCELS, UH, SEPARATED BY EACH SUBDIVISION OF MUD DISTRICT TWO.

SO THE COMMUNITY DESIGN IS MOSTLY CUL-DE-SACS, CURVY LINEAR STREETS.

AND, UH, THE DIFFERENT AREAS OF THE, UH, OF THE SUBDIVISION FIRST STARTED WHEN THE ACTUAL COMMUNITY WAS, UH, WAS AGREED UPON THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE DEVELOPMENT.

SO ON FEBRUARY 19TH, 1996, THE CITY HAD AN ORDINANCE TO HAVE A CALLED THE SIENNA JOINT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, WHERE THEY ACTUALLY AGREED ON THE GENERAL PLAN AND ADOPTED THE PLAN, WHICH IN WHICH INCLUDED THE LAND USE PLAN OF THE ENTIRE SIENNA DEVELOPMENT.

NOW, AS WE KNOW, AS TIME PASSED, DIFFERENT CHANGES ARE MADE.

SO THEY DID HAVE AN AMENDMENT.

THE FIRST AMENDMENT WAS IN 1998, AND THE CITY HAD ALSO APPROVED THAT ORDINANCE OR ORDINANCE.

THE SECOND AMENDMENT WAS IN 1998.

OKAY.

AND, UH, I'M SORRY, THIS, UH, SECOND AMENDMENT WAS ON MAY 15TH IN 2000.

SO LET'S GO TO THE ACTUAL LAND USE, UH, PLAN.

RIGHT NOW, WE ARE, UH, WE DID A EXISTING LAND USE, UH, ANALYSIS, USE, UH, USE UTILIZING OUR LAND USE THAT'S WITHIN OUR 2017 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

SO THE MAJORITY OF SIENNA MUD DISTRICT TWO IS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

AND THESE ARE SOME OTHER LAND DESIGNATIONS THAT WE HAVE, UH, RECOGNIZED WITHIN THE COMMUNITY.

SO WE HAVE OFFICE, PARK AND OPEN SPACE, PRIVATE RECREATION, SOME AREAS THAT ARE PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC.

THAT'S MOSTLY YOUR, YOUR RAILROAD, UH, AREAS.

UH, THE MAJORITY AGAIN IS SINGLE FAMILY, UH, RESIDENTIAL, WE HAVE SCHOOL, AND THE REST IS UTILITY, UTILITY EASEMENTS.

AND, UM, RIGHT OF WAYS IS ALSO THE UTILITIES, LAKE STREAMS AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS.

AND THAT ALSO INCLUDES THE, THE LEVEES.

SO ONE AREA I REALLY WANT TO, UH, FOCUS ON IS THE, UH, GOLF COURSE.

SO THIS AREA OF THE GOLF COURSE, I REALLY WANNA FOCUS ON THE, UH, COUNTRY CLUB AREA WHERE THEY ACTUALLY HAVE A PLACE OF ASSEMBLY WITHIN THAT AREA.

THIS LOCATION IS, UH, A COMMUNITY, UH, UH, FACILITY FOR THE COMMUNITY.

IT IS A, UH, OWNED BY THE SNA UH, NOW NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.

UH, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, WE ARE LOOKING AT HOW THEY ARE USING THIS PROPERTY TO, TO DESIGNATE THE TYPE OF ZONING.

BUT RIGHT NOW, THE LAND IS A, UH, PRIVATE RECREATION.

ALSO, I WOULD LIKE TO PUT INFERENCES ON THE OTHER AREAS OF THIS, UH, OF THE COMMUNITY.

AND I WANT TO PAY ATTENTION TO THE, UH, RECREATION, UH, AREA.

THAT'S YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD GYM, WHERE YOU GO OUT AND, AND, AND YOU HAVE YOUR, UH, PARK AND OPEN SPACE IN A PRIVATE, ANOTHER PRIVATE RECREATION AREA.

AND RIGHT NEXT TO THAT IS A OFFICE SPACE THAT THE COMMUNITY, UH, WHICH IS, UH, ONE OF THE OTHER OFFICE SPACES IN THE COMMUNITY.

AND THEN LASTLY, I REALLY WANT TO PUT EMPHASIS ON THE, UH, LEFT UPPER CORNER OF THE, OF THE COMMUNITY.

YOU HAVE A ACTIVE RIGHT NOW, A DAYCARE CENTER.

YOU HAVE A, THE ONLY PUBLIC SCHOOL WITHIN THE DISTRICT, AND YOU HAVE A CITY OWNED PARK AND ALSO A COMMUNITY PARK.

SO THE UPPER TOP TYPE TOP LEFT CORNER ON THIS MAP YOU'RE CURRENTLY LOOKING AT NOW, RIGHT NEXT TO THE SCHOOL, IS A CITY OWNED, UH, PARK THAT WAS DESIGNATED FOR THE CITY OF MISSOURI CITY AND ALSO YOUR PRIVATE,

[00:40:01]

AND THEN LASTLY, I JUST WANTED TO, UH, PAY ATTENTION TO THIS AREA, TO THE LEFT.

THAT AREA WAS, UH, RESERVED FOR OPEN SPACE AND FOR DRAINAGE, UH, EASEMENT BOAT, OPEN SPACE AND DRAINAGE, UH, UH, WITH THE PLATS.

AND, UH, I WENT BACK AGAIN TO THE RECREATION AREA.

AND, UH, LASTLY, I WANNA PLAY, UH, PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO RIGHT AT THE EDGE OF MUD DISTRICT TWO.

THERE'S ANOTHER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.

UH, THE REASON WHY I BRING THIS, UH, UP, BECAUSE THAT DOES HAVE AN EFFECT.

THE SURROUNDING AREA DOES HAVE AN EFFECT ON THE EXISTING, UH, COMMUNITY THAN WHERE THE LAND IS USED.

THIS CLICK IS NOT.

OH.

SO NEXT I WANNA TALK ABOUT PROPOSED ZONING.

SO RIGHT NOW, WE ARE NOT YET, UH, HAVE, UH, BRINGING ANYTHING TO THE COMMISSION OF THE TYPE OF ZONING, BUT THIS IS THE ZONING THAT WE ARE CURRENTLY LOOKING AT.

TWO ZONE, SOME OF THE PARCELS.

SO THIS IS NOT FINAL.

WE ARE STILL IN THE PROCESS OF DOING ANALYSES, BUT WE ALSO WE'RE LOOKING AT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R ONE AND, UH, R TWO, UH, L C O, WHICH IS YOUR OFFICE, COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND ALSO YOUR COMMUNITY FACILITIES ALL THROUGHOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

AND THAT'S THE PUBLIC FACILITIES AND QUASI FACILITIES, WHICH IS, UH, AREAS OWNED BY THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION.

SO, UH, SPEAKING OF THE PROCESSES, I JUST WANNA TALK ABOUT THE, THE NOTIF, UH, THE PUBLIC HEARING AND HOW WE, UH, NOTIFY THE PUBLIC.

WE, RIGHT NOW, TODAY, ON SEPTEMBER 13TH, WE ARE DISCUSSING THIS AT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

BUT THE NEXT PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION, OCTOBER 11TH, WE WILL ACTUALLY BE BRINGING TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION A CONSIDERATION OF THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE ZONING FOR THE ENTIRE MUD DISTRICT TWO.

AND THEN AFTER THAT, IT WILL BE, HAVE FIRST READING TO THE COUNCIL ON MONDAY, DECEMBER 4TH AT 6:30 PM SO THAT IS OUR, UH, ENG ENGAGE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROCESS THAT WE ARE USING TO DISCUSS THIS.

SO RIGHT NOW IT IS ASKING THE, UH, COMMISSION AND THE PUBLIC TO, UH, PAY, UH, NOT PAY ATTENTION TO, UH, LOOK AT.

AND WE, AND JUST FOR OPEN DISCUSSION FOR, FOR YOU TO DISCUSS ABOUT ANY QUESTIONS ANYMORE, ANY OTHER, ANY QUESTIONS SEEMS FAIRLY STRAIGHTFORWARD.

UH, IT'D BE INTERESTING TO SEE THE PUBLIC'S RESPONSE.

I I DON'T SEE ANYTHING NECESSARILY REAL CONTROVERSIAL HERE, SO, YEAH, BUT I, I, I DO WANT TO ADD TO THAT WE ARE, UH, TRYING TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE NOT PUTTING ANY PROPERTIES, UH, WITHIN THE NON-CONFORMING USE, WHICH WE JUST TALKED ABOUT DURING THIS LEGISLATIVE UPDATE.

I, I WAS JUST GONNA SAY THAT AS LONG AS WE DON'T DO ANY NON-CONFORMING THINGS, THAT'S FINE.

I JUST HAVE ONE QUICK QUESTION.

THE DESIGNATIONS YOU LISTED UP THERE, YOU DIDN'T INCLUDE ONE FOR THE, FOR THE CHILDCARE FACILITY? NOT GONNA BE, ACTUALLY, WE ARE LOOKING AT L C O OFFICE.

SO UNDER L C O, UH, THAT, WHICH IS RIGHT NOW THAT, UH, WE DO NOT CURRENTLY HAVE A L C O IN THE CITY.

UH, DON'T QUOTE ME ON THAT, BUT, UH, YOU CAN HAVE A CHILD DAYCARE CENTER UNDER L C O OKAY.

TO THE CURRENT ZONING RIGHT NOW.

OKAY.

YEAH.

AND PART OF COMMISSIONERS, AS WE'RE CONSIDERING IT, UM, ALL OF THE LAND IS DEVELOPED, UM, FOR THE MOST PART.

UM, BUT UNDERSTANDING THAT, YOU KNOW, FOR ZONING, YOU'RE LOOKING AT, THESE ARE THE PROPERTY RIGHTS THAT WOULD BE ESTABLISHED FOR THOSE PROPERTIES.

SO IF ANYTHING WAS EVER REDEVELOPED, RECONSTRUCTED, MODIFIED, IMPROVED, EXPANDED, THESE WOULD BE THE RULES THAT WOULD APPLY, UM, TO THAT DEVELOPMENT.

AND SO FOR THE, THE, UH, DAYCARE PORTION, SINCE WE DON'T HAVE A DAYCARE DISTRICT, IT'S UNDERSTANDING, YOU KNOW, UH, NOT TO APPLY A FULL COMMERCIAL, UM, BECAUSE THAT MAY NOT BE THE INTENT, UM, OF THAT SPACE.

UM, BUT STILL ALLOWING FOR THAT DAYCARE USE TO OPERATE AS IS.

GOT IT.

THANK.

AND WE DON'T ANTICIPATE ANY NON-CONFORMING ISSUES AT THIS POINT.

NO.

AND THAT'S THE GOAL.

UM, AND SO, UH, WITH ALL OF THE SINGLE FAMILY USE DISTRICTS, WE HAVE, I BELIEVE ABOUT SIX SINGLE FAMILY USE DISTRICTS.

UM, SO, UH, THEY'RE SIMILAR, BUT THEY HAVE DIFFERENT DENSITIES, UM, AND DIFFERENT SETBACKS, UM, DIFFERENT HEIGHT, UM, ALLOWANCES AS WELL.

SO WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IS, UM, HOW IT WAS DEVELOPED,

[00:45:01]

UH, AND, AND THAT'S, AND THAT'S PART OF WHY WE BROUGHT UP THE, UH, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BECAUSE FOR THE COMMISSION TO KNOW THAT THE CITY'S AGREEMENT WITH, UH, SIENNA CREATING THAT LAND USE PLAN, UM, MAKES IT MORE COMPARABLE, UH, TO THE ZONING DISTRICTS THAT THE CITY HAS.

SO TRANSLATING THAT LAND USE PLAN INTO, UH, THE CITY'S, UH, ZONING DISTRICTS.

ANY, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU.

VERY, I GOTTA ASK THIS INQUIRING MINDS.

JUST WANT TO KNOW, HAVE YOU GOTTEN ANY KIND OF FEEL OF THE LAY OF THE LAND, NO PUN INTENDED, BUT HOW TO, UH, THE SNA RESIDENTS OR THE, WHAT ARE SOME OF THEIR WISHES? HAVE YOU GOTTEN SURVEYS BACKED OR HAVE YOU TALKED TO THEM AS IN REGARDS TO ZONING? AND IT MIGHT NOT EVEN BE AN ISSUE TO 'EM.

I DON'T KNOW.

SO I KNOW, UM, STARTED CONVERSATIONS WITH PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, SO THEY'RE PAYING CLOSE ATTENTION.

UM, AND, UH, ONE OF THE CONVERSATIONS, THE, UH, COMMUNITY FACILITIES AREA THAT BRIAN, UH, MENTIONED, AND IF YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH THAT AREA, THERE'S AN AMPHITHEATER THERE.

UM, THEY HOST A LOT OF EVENTS, UM, THERE, UH, SO WE'LL BE COGNIZANT OF A ZONING THAT WILL ALLOW THEM TO CONTINUE, UH, TO USE THAT AS A COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND HOW THAT FITS INTO, YOU KNOW, THE ZONING STRUCTURE.

OKAY.

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

YEAH.

OKAY.

AND THAT'S ALSO EMPHASIS WHY WE ARE BRINGING THE, THE CONVERSATION UP INTO TWO, UH, PLANNING COMMISSIONS MEETING, AND NOT JUST THE, UH, USUAL ONE.

WE ACTUALLY GOING EXTRA MILE TO MAKE SURE THAT THE COMMUNITY'S AWARE OF THE DIFFERENT, UH, THE PROCESSES THAT WE ARE GOING THROUGH.

THIS IS NOT AN ACTION ITEM, BUT IN ORDER TO CLOSE OUT VOTE LINKS, I DO NEED YOU GUYS TO VOTE ON IT BECAUSE OF THE GROUPING IT WAS GROUPED WITH.

SO IF YOU GET A FIRST, A SECOND, AND THEN A QUICK VOTE.

OH, OKAY.

GRAB A MOTION AND A SECOND.

GO AHEAD AND CAST YOUR VOTES SO WE CAN CLOSE OUT THIS ITEM TECHNOLOGY.

OKAY.

MOTION PASSES.

LET'S SEE.

OKAY, WELL, WE STILL HAVE MORE.

[a. Presentation and discussion on the Comprehensive Plan Appraisal Report]

SO I'M GONNA GO OVER OUR ANTICIPATED TIMELINE.

THE CENSUS DATA HIGHLIGHTS FROM 20 15, 20 20, AND 2023, AND AN UPDATE ON WHAT WE'RE DOING BEHIND THE SCENES.

ALL RIGHT, SO THIS IS OUR PROJECTED TIMELINE.

UH, YOU CAN SEE WHAT WE WENT OVER IN BOTH MAY AND JUNE.

WE TOOK A LITTLE BREAK FOR JULY AND AUGUST, BUT NOW WE'RE BACK HERE IN SEPTEMBER WHERE WE'RE GOING TO ADDRESS CENSUS HIGHLIGHTS, THE CURRENT ADOPTED PLANS.

AND THIS MONTH OUR TEAM WILL BE KICKING OFF OUR OUTREACH.

UH, NEXT MONTH WE HOPE TO PRESENT AN APPRAISAL TO YOU ALL AND REPORT ON THE COMMUNITY FEEDBACK.

AND IF EVERYTHING GOES AS WE HOPE, WE WILL BE PRESENTING THIS APPRAISAL TO CITY COUNCIL IN DECEMBER.

SO NOW WE'RE GONNA MOVE ON TO THE SNAPSHOT OF MISSOURI CITY BETWEEN THE YEARS OF 2015 AND 2020.

THIS SLIDE IS, THIS IS REALLY LOUD.

OKAY.

THIS SLIDE IS, UM, THE CENSUS INFORMATION.

THE CENSUS BREAKS DOWN THE COUNTY INTO CENSUS TRACKS, WHICH DON'T ALWAYS ALIGN WITH THE CITY LIMITS.

SO IN 2010, YOU CAN SEE THE CENSUS TRACKS THAT OUR CITY AND E T J FELL INTO.

BUT IN 2020, THEY DID A REDISTRICTING.

SO NOW THE CENSUS TRACKS DO FALL MORE IN LINE WITH WHAT OUR CITY LIMITS LOOK LIKE.

IT'S NOT EXACT, BUT THIS IS HOW WE GATHER OUR DATA FOR WHAT'S GOING ON IN THE CITY.

ALL RIGHT.

SO NOW LET'S TALK ABOUT THE POPULATION.

UM, IN THE 2017 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, THEY DID SOME PROJECTIONS.

AND UNDERNEATH THAT ORANGE, OR RIGHT ABOVE THE ORANGE LINE IS WHERE THEY ANTICIPATED US TO BE.

NOW, UH, IF YOU LOOK OVER TO THE MIDDLE SECTION, WE HAVE THE ACTUALS AND THE PROJECTED.

SO THEY PROJECTED A 15% INCREASE FOR CITY LIMITS PROPER.

UH, AND IT REALLY, IN 2020, IT TURNED OUT TO JUST BE AN 8% INCREASE.

UH, AND THEN FOR THE E T J, WE ANTICIPATED A 24% PROJECTION INCREASE, BUT THE CENSUS DATA CAME BACK AT 60%.

THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT WE BUILT WAY MORE HOUSES THAN WE PLANNED IN THE E T J, UH, THE CENSUS TRACKS DON'T ALIGN

[00:50:01]

SO THIS POOLS INFORMATION IN SOME OF THE SURROUNDING CENSUS TRACKS.

SO WE DON'T HAVE THAT EXACT NUMBER OF HOUSES, BUT WE DO WANNA NOTE THAT IN 2020 WHEN THE CENSUS TOOK PLACE, WE WERE IN THE MIDDLE OF A PANDEMIC AND WE'RE NOT EXACTLY SURE ON THE DATA IF IT WAS COLLECTED IN THE BEST WAY POSSIBLE.

SO, UH, IN THE FUTURE, IN OUR FUTURE, UM, COMMUNITY SURVEYS THAT GET DONE ON A MORE REGULAR BASIS, WE HOPE TO HAVE SOME MORE REALISTIC NUMBERS.

.

AND THEN THE LAST THING, OH, MOVING ON TO IT'S FINE.

IT'S FINE.

GO AHEAD.

OKAY, .

SO NOW WE HAVE THE AVERAGE AGE OF THE CITY.

AS YOU CAN SEE FROM THIS SLIDE, THE AVERAGE MISSOURI CITY CITIZEN IS GETTING OLDER.

IN 2009, THE AVERAGE AGE WAS 25 AND A HALF, 35 AND A HALF.

BUT NOW WE'RE UP TO 42.

AND THIS IS IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR ALL OF US BECAUSE IT SIGNALS THAT WE ARE MISSING CERTAIN AGE GROUPS IN OUR CITY.

THEY'RE NOT STAYING HERE, OR THEY'RE COMING HERE AT A LATER DATE.

SO WHAT WE WANNA DO IS WE WANT TO, WHEN WE'RE CREATING OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, IS WE WANNA MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE AMENITIES AND INTEREST AND HOUSING AND THE THINGS THAT THE YOUNGER POPULATION NEED IN ORDER TO LIVE IN OUR CITY.

DO WE HAVE QUESTIONS? I FEEL LIKE MR. O'MALLEY, YOU HAVE QUESTIONS? NO, THAT WAS SO FASCINATING.

'CAUSE THAT'S WHAT WE DO, IS THAT EVERYBODY COMPLAINS ABOUT APARTMENTS.