RECESS THIS MEETING, CRYSTAL. THEN WE'LL COME BACK TO ANOTHER MEETING. ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT.
[1. CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:10]
THE TIME IS. TODAY IS MONDAY, OCTOBER 20TH, 2025. WE'LL NOW CALL THE CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING TO ORDER AT 6:51 P.M. WE DO HAVE A QUORUM OF COUNCIL. ITEM NUMBER THREE IS A PLEDGE.IT'LL BE LED BY OUR ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, JASON MCGILL. PLEASE JOIN ME IN THE PLEDGE. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL, I THANK YOU.
AT NUMBER FOUR, OUR PUBLIC COMMENTS. SECRETARY, DO WE HAVE ANYONE SIGNED UP FOR PUBLIC
[(a) City Manager Report - Provide an overview of Consent Agenda items and ...]
COMMENT? NO, MR. MAYOR, WE DO NOT. OKAY. ITEM NUMBER FIVE, OUR STAFF REPORTS FIVE, THE CITY MANAGER REPORT PROVIDE AN OVERVIEW OF CONSENT, AGENDA ITEMS AND ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE COMMUNITY INTEREST. ANGEL JONES, CITY MANAGER. GOOD EVENING. MAYOR, COUNCIL MEMBERS, I WILL.TONIGHT I WILL BE PROVIDING AN OVERVIEW OF THE CONSENT ITEMS BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING, STARTING WITH THE FIRST ITEM BEING ITEM B. THIS ITEM IS THE SECOND AND FINAL READING OF AN ORDINANCE REQUESTING APPROVAL TO AMEND REGULATIONS FOR THE LOCATION OF LIQUOR STORES. ITEM C IS THE SECOND AND FINAL READING OF AN ORDINANCE REQUESTING APPROVAL TO AMEND THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE TO PROHIBIT SMOKE SHOPS IN COMMERCIAL AREAS. ITEM D THIS ITEM IS THE SECOND AND FINAL READING OF AN ORDINANCE REQUESTING APPROVAL TO AMEND THE CITY CODE FOR NON-CONFORMING PROPERTY USES TO ALIGN WITH THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, ITEM E. THIS IS THE SECOND OF THREE READINGS OF AN ORDINANCE SEEKING AUTHORIZATION TO GRANT A FRANCHISE TO GFL ENVIRONMENTAL INCORPORATED, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS GFL, FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLE MATERIAL COLLECTION SERVICES. ITEM F IS AN AGENDA ITEM REQUESTING COUNCIL AUTHORIZATION TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A THREE YEAR CONTRACT WITH DELTA FIRE AND SAFETY INCORPORATED FOR THE PURCHASE OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE CLOTHING, CLOTHING OR FIRE GEAR IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $150,000 PER YEAR. ITEM G IS AN AGENDA ITEM REQUESTING COUNCIL AUTHORIZATION TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A THREE YEAR CONTRACT WITH VMWARE. LICENSING AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH SIDEPATH AT AN ANNUAL COST OF $134,327. ITEM H THIS ITEM SEEKS AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH HARMONY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF A LIFT STATION IN THE MUSTANG BAYOU SERVICE AREA. ITEM I THIS ITEM SEEKS AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY SECRETARY TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A JOINT AGREEMENT WITH FORT BEND COUNTY FOR THE NOVEMBER 4TH GENERAL AND SPECIAL ELECTIONS. ITEM J, SIMILAR TO ITEM I, SEEKS AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY SECRETARY TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A JOINT AGREEMENT WITH HARRIS COUNTY FOR THE NOVEMBER 4TH GENERAL AND SPECIAL ELECTIONS. AND THE LAST AGENDA ITEM IS A REQUEST TO CONSIDER AUTHORIZATION TO CONSIDERATION TO AUTHORIZE THE ACCEPTANCE OF $1,400 CASH IN LIEU OF PARKLAND FOR RAMBO CREEK ESTATES. THIS IS A ONE DWELLING UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON RAMBO CREEK DRIVE IN PARK ZONE 12. THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT. ALL RIGHT.
[6. CONSENT AGENDA]
THANK YOU. RECOGNIZING COUNCIL MEMBER BONEY, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA. ITEMS SIX A THROUGH SIX J AND PULL ITEM SIX K. FOR DISCUSSION. OKAY. IT'S BEEN A MOTION. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. IT'S BEEN A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER BONEY AND SECONDED BY COUNCIL MEMBER CLOUSER. SEEING NO OTHER DISCUSSIONS, LET'S GO AHEAD AND VOTE. CAN YOU DO A ROLL CALL, PLEASE? MAYOR. YES. MEMBER. BROWN. MARSHALL. YES. MEMBER.CLOUSER. YES. MEMBER. RILEY. YES. MEMBER. BONY. YES. MEMBER. O'DEKIRK. YES. MEMBER. EMERY.
[(k) Consideration and Possible Action - Authorize the acceptance of $1,400...]
YES. THE MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. ITEM K YES. THANK YOU. MAYOR, I JUST WANT. I HAD A QUESTION, DONNIE. RELATIVE TO THE CASH IN LIEU PROCESS, I KNOW THAT THERE WAS[00:05:01]
SOME DISCUSSION ABOUT THAT. THAT ENTIRE PROCESS AND DISCUSSION ABOUT WHETHER WE WERE GOING TO CHANGE HOW WE DO CASH IN LIEU, BECAUSE A LOT OF SUBDIVISIONS THAT GET BUILT OUT AFTER THEY GET MOVING AND GOING, THEY REALIZE THEY DON'T HAVE A NEIGHBORHOOD PARK OF ANY SORT.AND SO THEY'VE ALWAYS, YOU KNOW, COME BACK LATER AND COMPLAINED ABOUT THAT. SO HAVE WE HAS THAT CHANGED OR WHERE ARE WE AT ON? IT HASN'T OFFICIALLY CHANGED AT THIS POINT. STAFF IS STILL WORKING ON A NEW ORDINANCE. WE ARE LOOKING TO PRESENT THAT NEW ORDINANCE TO THE PARKS BOARD FOR APPROVAL IN THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER. ONCE WE RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM THE PARKS BOARD, WE ARE LOOKING BY THE END OF THIS YEAR TO BE PRESENTING THAT TO CITY COUNCIL. DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE BRIEFLY OR TO SHARE? SO WE DID A SMALL PRESENTATION. DANIELLE STEWART, OUR ASSISTANT PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR, SHARED WITH EACH OF YOU GUYS AN INCREASE TO THE, YOU KNOW, FEES IN LIEU OF LAND. AND SO WE ARE LOOKING AT A FAIRLY DECENT INCREASE AT THIS POINT. WE HAVEN'T OFFICIALLY LANDED ON THAT NUMBER AS OF YET, BUT WE'RE REALLY CLOSE. AND WE EXPECT TO HAVE THAT HERE IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS. MOVING AWAY FROM CASH AND LIEU ALTOGETHER OR DOING LIKE SPLIT CASH IN LIEU. AND THEN MAYBE THEY BUILD A SMALL PARK IN SOME CASES. I KNOW THIS IS EXTREMELY SMALL, BUT YES, BUT SOME OF THESE OTHER DEVELOPMENTS THAT ARE HAPPENING WITH WITH THE ORDINANCE, YOU ALWAYS HAVE THE OPTION OF PROVIDING LAND AND THE OPPORTUNITY TO BUILD A PLAYGROUND OR TO DO THE CASH IN LIEU OF. SO YOU HAVE BOTH OPTIONS EVEN RIGHT NOW IN THE CURRENT ORDINANCE. AND SO THAT'S STILL AVAILABLE TO EVERYBODY. AND IN THE NEW ORDINANCE IT'LL STILL BE AVAILABLE. WELL, I GUESS WHAT I'M ASKING IS ARE WE GOING TO MOVE TOWARDS DEMANDING THAT THEY DON'T JUST USE IT? BECAUSE WHAT HAPPENS IS THEY USE THAT AS AN OPTION TO JUST SAY, YOU KNOW WHAT, IT'S EASIER TO JUST DO CASH IN LIEU OF INSTEAD OF BUILDING A COMMUNITY PARK OR NEIGHBORHOOD PARK. YEAH. THAT AREA. SO I'M JUST SAYING JUST I GUESS WHEN IT'S TIME TO DISCUSS IT IN THE FUTURE, I JUST WANT IT TO BE KNOWN THAT THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE NEED TO STRONGLY CONSIDER INSTEAD OF JUST GIVING THEM THAT OPTION, BECAUSE THAT'S THE OPTION THEY'RE GOING TO ALWAYS CHOOSE MOST. AND SO I'M JUST SAYING THAT I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO AT LEAST WHEN WE LOOK AT OUR PARKS MASTER PLAN OR KIND OF THE THINGS THAT WE'RE DOING RELATIVE TO NEW DEVELOPMENTS THAT ARE HAPPENING, AND WE TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION AND, AND PUT THEM IN A POSITION TO CONSIDER THAT AS AN OPTION AND NOT GIVE THEM AN EITHER OR.
CITY MANAGER. JONES I WAS JUST GOING TO RESPOND TO I MEAN, I THINK WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS, IS SPOT ON BECAUSE THIS IS A RETREAT ITEM THAT WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT BECAUSE NOT ONLY ARE WE LOOKING AT NEW DEVELOPMENTS, BUT WE NEED TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE WHOLE PARK MASTER PLAN AND, AND MAKE SURE THAT IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE CAN SIGN ON, ON, ON, ON GOING FORWARD, BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO COME DOWN TO A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT FACTORS. AND I THINK THIS IS A RETREAT ITEM THAT WE NEED TO DISCUSS WITH SOME MORE DETAIL. AND IF I IF I MAY, I WOULD ALSO POINT OUT THAT RIGHT NOW, WE CURRENTLY HAVE A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF PARK LAND THAT IS UNDEVELOPED. AND SO THERE ARE MOMENTS WHERE THE DESIRE FROM STAFF IS THAT WE RECEIVE THE THE CASH IN LIEU OF RATHER THAN LAND. SO THAT WAY WE CAN DEVELOP THOSE PIECES OF PROPERTY AS WELL. SO THERE'S ALWAYS GOING TO BE A BALANCE OF WHAT WE NEED. I JUST WANT US TO MAKE SURE WE'RE CONSIDERING THAT, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE I THINK NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS WORK AS WELL, IN ADDITION TO, YOU KNOW, MAYBE EVEN DOING A SPLIT, YOU KNOW, IT COULD BE, YOU KNOW, BUILD A SMALLER PARK AND THEN NEIGHBORHOOD PARK AND GIVE THE REMAINDER IN CASH. I JUST WANT US TO HAVE THAT DISCUSSION BECAUSE I THINK THAT'S IMPORTANT, BECAUSE A LOT OF THESE COMMUNITIES ARE BEING DEVELOPED AND THEY DON'T HAVE THEY THEY GET TOLD, GO TWO MILES, THREE MILES UP THE STREET, THEY HAVE A PARK. AND THAT'S JUST NOT FEASIBLE FOR A LOT OF PEOPLE. MAKES SENSE. RECOGNIZING MAYOR PRO TEM BROWN. THANK YOU, MAYOR, AND THANK YOU FOR THE REPORT. BUT CITY MANAGER, I WANTED TO SHARE WITH OUR WITH MY COLLEAGUES AT NRDC MEETINGS, WHEN WE DO HAVE DEVELOPERS THAT HAVE COME BEFORE US AND THEY ARE TRYING TO DO CASH IN LIEU OF BECAUSE MAYBE THE FOOTPRINT OF THE LAND IS SO SMALL, WE'VE SENT THEM BACK WITH ADDITIONAL IDEAS TO EVEN TRY TO FIND WAYS TO PUT IT ON THE ROOFTOP IF IT'S MULTIFAMILY. SO WE ASKED THEM TO THINK OUTSIDE OF THE BOX. SO I'M BRINGING THAT UP SO THAT WHEN WE GO INTO OUR RETREAT THAT WE ALSO EXPLORE THOSE OTHER OPTIONS AS WELL. BECAUSE IN HONESTLY, THE THE PARK IS GENERALLY FOR THE RESIDENTS THAT ARE NEAR THAT FACILITY. SO THERE ARE ADDITIONAL OPTIONS TO HELP US BETTER MOVE AWAY FROM CASH IN LIEU OF. WE JUST EXPLORE MORE OF THEM. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. IS THERE A MOTION I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO
[00:10:05]
APPROVE ITEM SIX K OKAY. SECOND, IT'S BEEN A MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER BONEY, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER EMERY. SEEING NO ONE ELSE RAISE THEIR HAND FOR QUESTIONS. GO AHEAD. OKAY.MAYOR? YES, MAYOR PRO TEM BRIAN MARSHALL. YES. MEMBER. CLOUSER. YES. MEMBER. RILEY. YES. MEMBER.
BONEY. YES. MEMBER. YES. MEMBER. EMERY. YES. THE MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. ALL RIGHT. THANK
[(1) Public Hearing - To receive comments for or against a request by Sergi...]
YOU. ITEM NUMBER SEVEN, OUR PUBLIC HEARING AND RELATED ACTION SEVEN ZONING, PUBLIC HEARING AND ORDINANCE SEVEN A1, THE PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS FOR OR AGAINST A REQUEST BY SERGIO SALAZAR TO REZONE AN AN APPROXIMATE 5.1913 ACRES. DID I SAY SERGIO SALAZAR? YES. YEAH. THAT'S RIGHT. OH, YEAH. OH. FIVE POINT. 5.1913 ACRES TRACK OF LAND FROM OUR ONE A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. AND TO THE EXTENT SUCH ZONING DEVIATES FROM THE FUTURE LAND USE AND CHAPTER MAP OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO PROVIDE AN AMENDMENT. THEREFORE, THE SITE IS. THE SITE IS LOCATED NORTH OF LIFEPOINT CHURCH, NORTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF TRUESDALE DRIVE AND WICKSBURG, SOUTH OF ALDRIDGE DRIVE AND EAST OF WICKSBURG VILLAGE OF CUMBERLAND RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION AND WEST OF SEDONA CREEK RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION. WE'LL NOW GO AHEAD AND OPEN THIS PUBLIC HEARING. ANYONE FOR COMMENTS? NO, MR. MAYOR, THERE ARE NONE. OKAY. IF THERE'S NO FURTHER COMMENTS, WE'LL NOW GO[(2) Consideration and Possible Action - First of Two Readings - An ordinan...]
AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. 701782 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MISSOURI CITY, TEXAS, CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF APPROXIMATELY APPROXIMATELY 5.19 ACRES OF LAND FROM R-1, A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, TO PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.DESCRIBING SAID 5.19 ACRES REGULATING AND RESTRICTING THE DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF PROPERTY WITHIN SUCH PD. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP OF THE CITY OF MISSOURI CITY. PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
PROVIDING FOR REPEAL, PROVIDING A PENALTY, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, AND CONTAINING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE SUBJECT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. RECOGNIZING JENNIFER THOMAS GOMEZ, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. AND I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT, SERGIO SALAZAR, IS HERE. SO THAT IS LEGITIMATE. WE DO HAVE TWO.
THAT IS OUR APPLICANT'S NAME. THIS PROPERTY HAS STATED IS AT THE INTERSECTION OF TRUESDALE AND VICKSBURG. THE REQUEST IS TO AMEND THE CURRENT ZONING, WHICH ALLOWS FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. AND THE INTENT IS TO DEVELOP A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPOSAL. THE PROPERTY IS A LITTLE OVER FIVE ACRES. WHAT THE PROPOSAL WOULD DO WOULD CREATE RESIDENTIAL LOTS THAT ARE SMALLER THAN THE RESIDENTIAL LOTS THAT ARE ADJACENT TO IT IN THE VICKSBURG SUBDIVISION. AND SO THAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. THE DEVELOPER HAS WORKED ON ITERATIONS OF A SITE PLAN TO POSITION LOTS THAT WOULD MITIGATE ITS PROXIMITY TO THOSE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL, AS WELL, AS WELL AS COMPLY WITH ACCESS REQUIREMENTS OR LONG TRUESDALE AND ALSO ALONG VICKSBURG. THE CURRENT VERSION OF THE SITE PLAN BEFORE YOU WOULD ALLOW FOR 39 RESIDENTIAL LOTS IN THREE BLOCKS AND PRIVATE STREETS WOULD BE THE DESIGN FOR THIS SUBDIVISION.
ACCESS WOULD BE PROVIDED TO BOTH TRUESDALE AND VICKSBURG. BECAUSE THESE ARE RESIDENTIAL LOTS, THERE ARE PRIVACY FENCING THAT IS PART OF THIS APPLICATION. THE DEVELOPER HAS AGREED TO CONSTRUCT MASONRY WALLS AROUND THE PERIMETER. I KNOW STAFF HAS HAD DISCUSSIONS IN TERMS OF MAINTENANCE, AS WELL AS TO REMOVE ANY POTENTIAL CONFLICTS BETWEEN ANY WALLS OR FENCING THAT'S ADDED, AND SO WE WILL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE DEVELOPER ON THE SITE DESIGN SITE PLAN, AS WELL AS THOSE RESIDENTS THAT ADJOIN. THE ORDINANCE WOULD REQUIRE AN HOA TO MAINTAIN ANY COMMON FENCING BETWEEN THE NEW PROPOSED SUBDIVISION AND THE EXISTING VICKSBURG SUBDIVISION. THANK YOU. THE PROPOSAL DOES COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT 2017 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND SUPPORTS RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE UPDATE TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
ADDING A HOUSING OPTION WITHIN AN AREA THAT IS PRIMARILY RESIDENTIAL, AND SO THIS COULD
[00:15:08]
SUPPORT GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES ALONG SOME OF OUR KEY CORRIDORS, INCLUDING TRAMMEL, FRESNO AND HIGHWAY SIX, AS WELL AS THE FORT BEND PARKWAY. SOME ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS THAT ARE INCLUDED IN THE ORDINANCE BEFORE YOU. THIS PLAN WOULD COMPLY WITH THE TWO CAR MINIMUM GARAGE REQUIREMENTS. THIS PLAN RECOMMENDATION WOULD ALLOW FOR A PARKING CONTROLS. SINCE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SMALLER LOTS AND AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR A DIFFERENT TYPE OF HOUSING PRODUCT, ENSURING THAT THE PRIVATE STREETS CAN ACCOMMODATE PARKING FOR BOTH RESIDENTS AND VISITORS TO THE SUBDIVISION, AND THAT IT DOESN'T BECOME AN ISSUE FOR THOSE ADJOINING NEIGHBORHOODS. THE ORDINANCE ALSO PROVIDES FOR LANDSCAPE BUFFER DRAINAGE PROVISIONS AS WELL. TRAFFIC HAS BEEN CONSIDERED AS PART OF THIS PROPOSAL. A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WOULD STILL BE REQUIRED THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. PUBLIC NOTICE HAS BEEN PROVIDED, AND I WILL STATE THAT WE DID HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE AN UPDATE TO THE VICKSBURG HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION PRIOR TO ITS FIRST PUBLIC HEARING, AND THEY WERE IN ATTENDANCE AT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING. TO DATE, WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY WRITTEN COMMENTS ON THIS APPLICATION. SO AGAIN, THIS IS AN APPLICATION TO ZONE THIS FROM R-1A, WHICH IS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION WAS TO APPROVE, AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DOES FORWARD A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION. AND THAT CONCLUDES THE PRESENTATION. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. RECOGNIZE.MISS FOLLOW UP OKAY. WE'LL START FROM THERE. THE QUESTION IN REGARDS TO THE PRIVATE STREETS IN DISTRICT A, THAT'S A DIRTY WORD. SO CAN YOU PLEASE ELABORATE ON WHAT THE CITY CODE IS AS IT RELATES TO THIS PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT AND THE PRIVATE STREETS? SO IN TERMS OF THE PRIVATE STREETS, THE DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE TO CREATE A MAINTENANCE MECHANISM. AND SO WHAT'S EVOLVED OVER THE YEARS IS THE PRIVATE STREETS WILL HAVE TO BE IDENTIFIED BY STREET SIGNS. SO IT'S CLEAR TO BOTH RESIDENTS LIVING IN THE PRIVATE STREET, THE AREA AS WELL AS OUTSIDERS COMING IN THAT THEY ARE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED. THE RESTRICTIONS THAT THE DEVELOPER WILL BE REQUIRED TO DRAFT AS PART OF THE PLANNING PROCESS, WE'LL HAVE TO CREATE AND DESIGNATE THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY THROUGH THE HOA AND PROVIDE PROVISIONS ON HOW THEY WOULD COLLECT FUNDING IN ORDER TO SUPPORT THAT MAINTENANCE. SO IS THAT AN AGREEMENT THAT THE HOA IS GOING TO HAVE TO SIGN OFF WITH THE DEVELOPERS? THE THE DEVELOPER WOULD CREATE THE RESTRICTIONS AND THEN HAND IT OVER TO THE HOA. SO THE DEVELOPER USUALLY IN GENERATING THOSE RESTRICTIONS WILL CREATE THE HOA ENTITY AND ALL OF THE PROVISIONS WITH IT. AND THEN ONCE THE DEVELOPER HAS COMPLETED CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION, THEY'LL TURN THAT OVER TO THE HOA. SO LET ME ASK YOU THIS IS THE HOA AWARE THAT WHAT OUR CITY CODE IS FOR PRIVATE STREETS, THAT THE CITY WILL NOT BE MAINTAINING THEM? NOT YET, BECAUSE THE HOA DOESN'T EXIST YET. SO THIS WOULD BE A NEW HOA. OR IF THEY WORK IN AGREEMENT WITH THE ADJACENT HOA. BECAUSE ONE THING AND I KNOW SASHI STEPPED TO THE PODIUM. BUT ONE THING IF YOU'RE NOT AWARE, THIS IS THE SAME DEVELOPER THAT CONSTRUCTED ON THE EAST SIDE OF VICKSBURG AS WELL. AND SO THOSE NEW HOMES THERE, THE HOA THAT WAS CREATED FOR THOSE NEW HOMES, THEY WOULD DO SOMETHING COMPARABLE ON THIS SIDE OF OF VICKSBURG. AND WITH THOSE PRIVATE STREETS, ARE THEY NARROW OR ARE THEY NORMAL SIZE? WOULD OUR EMERGENCY VEHICLES AND OUR GFL VEHICLES HAVE ANY RESTRICTIONS TO GETTING DOWN THOSE STREETS? GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. IF I MAY ANSWER THAT QUESTION WITH LESSONS LEARNED, WE HAVE ADOPTED STRINGENT STANDARDS. OUR STANDARDS NOW REQUIRE PRIVATE STREETS TO BE BUILT TO PUBLIC STREET STANDARDS. THAT MEANS THEY'LL HAVE THE REQUIRED WIDTH TURNING RADIUS TO ACCOMMODATE EMERGENCY VEHICLES, AND STAFF WILL ENSURE THAT THAT'S INCORPORATED AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. OKAY. AND THEN MY OTHER QUESTION IS IN REGARDS TO THE HOA BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FENCING, ARE THEY MAINTAIN THE MASONRY FENCING AFTER THE DEVELOPER INSTALLS THEM? OKAY. AND THEN MY LAST ONE IS THE MUD 47 SERVICES. WHAT TYPE OF SERVICES
[00:20:03]
OR WHAT WHAT WHAT ARE THEIR WHAT ARE WHAT ROLE DO THEY PLAY IN THIS PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT? THEY PROVIDE THE UTILITY SERVICES. WATER AND WASTEWATER. IS ALL THE UTILITIES ALREADY PROVIDED OR BUILT, THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND ALSO DRAINAGE. SO WE'LL ENSURE THAT THERE IS ADEQUATE DRAINAGE CAPACITY. IF IT IS DONE, THEN THEY'LL HAVE TO PROVIDE SOME KIND OF DETENTION TO ACCOMMODATE THAT NEEDS. OKAY, SO YOU ANSWERED MY OTHER QUESTION TOO, BECAUSE THAT WAS IT. AND HOW MANY WITH WITH THE NUMBER OF HOMES THAT THEY'RE LOOKING TO BUILD, WHAT IS THE AVERAGE SQUARE FOOT? AND IT'S A THREE PART AVERAGE SQUARE FOOT OR LOT LAND LOT. THEN THE OTHER QUESTION IS THE VALUE OF THE HOMES. AND THEN THE OTHER THING IS HOW MUCH SPACE IS BETWEEN FROM ONE HOME TO THE OTHER. AND SO THE APPLICANT IS HERE AND CAN PROVIDE ANY DETAILS ON THE ACTUAL PRODUCT TYPE. I WILL SAY IN TERMS OF WHAT THEIR APPLICATION, THE SITE PLAN, THE LOT SIZES, MINIMUM LOT SIZES ARE ABOUT 35FT CURRENTLY. THIS WOULD ALLOW FOR 60 FOOT SIZE LOTS, AND THE LOT SQUARE FOOTAGE ITSELF WOULD BE ABOUT 3500FTā !S. SO IT'S ABOUT HALF OF THE SIZE OF WHAT THE CURRENT ZONING WOULD ALLOW. AND EITHER ONE OF THE SERGIOS CAN COME FORWARD. AND I PREFER THE DEVELOPER THOUGH. HI. HOW Y'ALL DOING? GOOD. HOW ARE YOU? GOOD EVENING COUNCIL. THE HOMES ARE GOING TO VARY SOMEWHERE BETWEEN 1700 AND 2000FTā !S. HOPEFULLY WH WE JUST HAVE SOME PRODUCTS RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET ON THE EAST SIDE, AND WE WERE SELLING FOR ABOUT 450 TO 500. SO WE WERE ABLE TO BRING UP THE SALES PRICE IN THAT AREA AND WE HOPEFULLY KEEP THESE ARE GOING TO BE A LITTLE BIT SMALLER.THOSE WERE ABOUT THE 2200 TO 2500. SO I'M GUESSING THEY'RE GOING TO RUN SOMEWHERE IN THE FOUR HUNDREDS TO MID FOUR 50S FOR THE BRAND NEW HOMES AND IS ARE THE WITH THE LOT SIZES BEING SMALLER IS THE SPACE BETWEEN EACH HOME AVERAGE OR IS IT ALSO CONDENSED TEN FEET FIVE FEET ON EACH PROPERTY SIDE FOR A TOTAL OF TEN? AS YOU ALL KNOW, HOUSING AFFORDABILITY IS STILL A CONCERN. AND SO WE GOT TO TRY TO PUT AS MANY HOMES AS POSSIBLE TO MAKE SURE WE CAN GET THOSE PRICES DOWN ON THE HOMES, TO BE ABLE TO SELL THEM TO PEOPLE. AND I HAVEN'T SEEN THE PRODUCT. SO IS THIS IS THIS BRICK OKAY. ALRIGHTY. SO WE'RE NOT GOING TO GET SHOCKED AND SURPRISED AND SEE HARDIPLANK OR SOMETHING HALFWAY THROUGH. IT IS THE THE FACING IS IT BRICK OR IS IT A HEARTY FACE? WELL, DEPENDING ON SOME WE'LL HAVE SOME A LITTLE BIT OF STUCCO. I DON'T KNOW IF Y'ALL SEEN THE PROJECTS ON GRADING STATES. THOSE ARE MOSTLY MASONRY STUCCO HERE ON THIS ONE. WE'LL PROBABLY SWITCH OVER JUST TO BRICK ON A LOT OF IT. THE FRONT WILL HAVE A MASONRY FRONT AND THEN AGAIN TO CONTROL COSTS. HARDIE ON THE SIDES. AND WITH YOUR LAST PROJECT DID YOU FIND ANY ISSUES OF ARE THESE FOR SALE OR FOR LEASE FOR SALE. AND DID YOU FIND ANY, YOU KNOW, DIFFICULTIES IN SELLING THOSE, THOSE PARTICULAR LOTS WE GOT FOUR LEFT. WE'RE NOT IN A RUSH TO SELL. SO WE KEEP WE KEPT THE PRICE HIGH. WE'RE NOT IN A TRYING TO SELL THEM LOWER THAN WHAT WE WANT. IF THE MARKET, YOU KNOW, THEY'VE ONLY BEEN SITTING ON THE MARKET FOR ABOUT THREE MONTHS. SO WE'LL HOLD OFF A LITTLE BIT LONGER, BUT HOPEFULLY START THIS OTHER SUBDIVISION. OKAY. SO YOU DON'T FIND ANY REASON THAT THESE SHOULDN'T SELL? NO. WE SOLD ALL THE OTHER HOMES SO WE ONLY GOT FOUR LEFT AND OKAY, OKAY. THANK YOU. RECOGNIZING COUNCILMEMBER EMERY. AND WE'LL WORK OUR WAY DOWN. YES, SIR. WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT THE DESIGN OR THE DESIGNS AND THE MATERIAL THAT YOU'RE GOING TO BE USING, ARE THEY IN HARMONY WITH THE HOMES AROUND THE. YES, SIR. THIS COMPLEX. YES, THE VERY SIMILAR. THE ONES ON THE WEST SIDE WILL BE MORE IN LINE WITH THE EXISTING HOMES. THE ONES ON THE EAST SIDE WERE A LITTLE BIT MORE MODERN PRODUCTS. WHEN IT'S SMALLER UNITS. THOSE WAS ONLY A 15 HOME COMMUNITY. I THINK YOU CAN GET AWAY WITH A MORE MODERN FEEL, BUT ONCE YOU GO TO, YOU KNOW, LARGER UNITS, WE WANT TO KEEP IT MORE TRADITIONAL. 1 OR 2 CAR GARAGE, TWO CAR GARAGES, ALL OF THEM. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. RECOGNIZING COUNCILMEMBER MAHONEY, THANK YOU. FIRST OF ALL, I'M SO EXCITED TO SEE THIS DEVELOPMENT. IF YOU KNOW THE HISTORY OF THIS TRACT OF LAND FROM WHENCE WE'VE COME, THIS IS AND TO TO SEE NO PUSHBACK. AND I DID SPEAK TO THE THE RESIDENTS AND HOA FROM FROM VICKSBURG AND TO TO NOT HAVE ANYBODY OBJECT IS IS A IS A WIN I WILL SAY THAT WE'VE WE'VE HAD COMMERCIAL PROPOSED THEIR DAYCARE, GOT SUED. IT'S BEEN A
[00:25:08]
LONG JOURNEY YOU KNOW AND YOU KNOW, LACK OF MAINTENANCE IN THE AREA AS FAR AS UPKEEP. SO TO SEE THIS DEVELOPMENT, QUALITY DEVELOPMENT COME, I'M EXCITED ABOUT I DID HAVE A QUESTION RELATIVE TO THE HOA THAT WAS BROUGHT UP, ASSUMING I KNOW THEY'RE PRIVATE AND I KNOW THAT THERE'S MORE STRINGENT, YOU KNOW, THINGS IN PLACE, HOW DO WE ADDRESS THE SITUATION? HOWEVER, IF THE HOA USURPS THEIR RESPONSIBILITY AND DOESN'T FOLLOW THROUGH ON MAINTENANCE, WHAT WHAT IS THE STEP TO ADDRESS THE STREETS IF THEY NEED TO BE REPAIRED IN THAT AREA? IF THE HOA JUST, GOD FORBID, SAYS THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO TAKE CARE OF IT? AND SO I THINK, SERGIO, IF YOU ALL CAN DESCRIBE KIND OF THE MECHANISM BECAUSE THERE'S PRIVATE STREETS ON THE OTHER SIDE AS WELL. AND SO THE MECHANISM THAT YOU CREATED IN ORDER FOR THE HOA, I'M TALKING ABOUT LONG TERM BUILD IT. YEAH. TALKING ABOUT LONG TERM. YEAH.WELL I MEAN LIKE ANYTHING I THINK IF YOU BUILD A NICE QUALITY SUBDIVISION THEN THE HOMES WILL, YOU KNOW, MAINTAIN IF THE HOMES ARE BEING MAINTAINED THEN THE HOA STAYS IN EFFECT. SO AS LONG AS THE HOA HAS THE POWER TO I THINK FROM I KNOW FROM TEXAS LAW, THEY HAVE THE POWER TO PUT LIENS ON HOMES. SO THERE'S A LOT OF HOAS, HAVE A LOT OF POWER IN THE STATE OF TEXAS TO COLLECT THE MONEY THAT THEY THEY'RE OWED. SO WITH THAT SAID, THEY SHOULD HAVE THE SUBDIVISIONS. WE DO HAVE. WE'VE WE WE WEIGH OUT THE OPTIONS OF RAISING THE HOA FEES A LOT COMPARED TO TO HELP SELL THE HOUSE, BECAUSE IT HELPS THE LOWER THEY ARE, THE THE LOWER THE PAYMENTS GOING TO BE, BUT THE LOWER THEY ARE USUALLY MEANS THE SUBDIVISION GETS NOT AS CAREFUL. YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT PROTECTED AS CAREFULLY THE LANDSCAPING AROUND IT, THE FENCES, THE GATES. SO WHEN WE CREATE THE HOA, WE USUALLY ALLOCATE A DECENT AMOUNT OF FEES TO THE HOA. WE DON'T TRY TO GO LOW ON THOSE. I GUESS MY BETTER QUESTION IS, IS THERE A AS IT RELATES TO THE MAINTENANCE OF THE STREETS? IS THERE A LOCKBOX OR SOMETHING THAT THIS MONEY IS COLLECTED IN WHERE THE HOA FEES THAT THEY'RE COLLECTING GOES AND IS EARMARKED FOR, YOU KNOW, THE MAINTENANCE AND UPKEEP OF THE STREETS? YOU KNOW, LONG TERM, I'M JUST CURIOUS BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, WE'RE DEALING WITH ISSUES NOW AS IT RELATES TO PRIVATE STREETS. AND WE'VE WE'VE NOT HAD THESE TYPES OF STRINGENT AGREEMENTS OR THINGS IN PLACE. SO I'M ASKING REALLY STAFF THE QUESTION MORE THAN ANYTHING AS TO HOW DO WE ENSURE, YOU KNOW THAT, THAT IF IF TAXPAYERS SAY, YOU KNOW, WE'RE PAYING TAXES AND THESE ARE, YOU KNOW, BUILT TO BE PUBLIC STREETS, THE CITY SHOULD TAKE CARE OF IT. IF THE HOA IS NOT. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE ARE GIVING OURSELVES COVER. COUNCILMEMBER, I'LL TRY TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION. I THINK THIS IS A PRIVATE STREET MAINTENANCE ISSUE IS SOMETHING THAT HAS COME UP IN OTHER CITIES AND JURISDICTIONS AS WELL. CONCRETE STREETS. ONCE BUILT, THEY HAVE A LIFESPAN OF 30 YEARS. BUT WHAT DO YOU DO AFTER THAT WHICH WE HAVE ENCOUNTERED IN SOME AREAS, SOME COMMUNITIES HAVE STARTED MANDATING RESERVE FUNDS, DEDICATED RESERVE FUNDS FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF STREETS. THAT IS SOMETHING THAT THIS BODY CAN REQUEST OR. ASK FOR THE DEVELOPER TO DEDICATE A CERTAIN PORTION OF THE HOA FEES TO GO TO A RESERVE FUND, TO BE DEDICATED ONLY FOR STREETS, SO THAT YOU CAN ENSURE THAT THE STREETS ARE MAINTAINED AND THERE IS ADEQUATE FUND 30 YEARS DOWN THE ROAD, WHEN IT'S TIME TO REBUILD, THEY HAVE THE MONEY TO GO REBUILD AND THEY DON'T COME TO THE CITY. THAT'S WHAT I'M ASKING. IF IF THERE IS A WAY THAT WE HAVE THE POWER AS A CITY, BUT IN APPROVING THIS TO TO DO THAT, JOYCE, IS THAT ALLOWABLE? SO WE COULD ADD LANGUAGE TO THE PD THAT BECAUSE WE ARE ALLOWED TO MANDATE CERTAIN RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS SO WE CAN TRY TO FORMULATE SOME LANGUAGE, I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN MANDATE A SPECIFIC PERCENTAGE, BUT WE CAN CERTAINLY MANDATE THAT A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT BE CREATED THAT PROVIDES THAT THERE IS A RESERVE CREATED FOR STREET MAINTENANCE. I DO THINK WE CAN DO THAT. SO IN OUR IN THE MOTION FOR THIS, THAT WOULD NEED TO BE INCLUDED. THAT WOULD NEED TO BE AN AMENDMENT. YES.
OKAY. WELL I WOULD LIKE TO I KNOW THERE'S GOING TO BE FURTHER DISCUSSION, BUT I'D LIKE TO MAKE THAT MOTION TO APPROVE THE PD WITH THAT AMENDMENT TO BE MADE. AND IF SOMEONE WANTS TO SECOND THAT LATER ON, THEY CAN BUT AT LEAST LIKE TO MAKE THAT MOTION. I'LL SECOND. THAT COUNCILMEMBER. COUNCILMEMBER. YES. SEVERAL OF MY QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ANSWERED HERE. ARE ALL OF THE UNITS TWO STORY. I THINK THERE'S A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF ONE STORY HOMES,
[00:30:06]
BUT I THINK MOST MAJORITY AND IT'S BASED REALLY ON SALES. WE'LL DO THE FIRST TWO STORIES MOSTLY. OKAY IF PEOPLE WANT ONE STORIES, BUT BECAUSE OF THE SMALL, SMALLER FOOTPRINT ON THE LOT, I DON'T THINK A LOT OF THEM ALLOWED FOR ONE STORY. SO JUST THE LOGISTICS OF IT MANDATES TWO STORY. OKAY. AND AND THIS IS I'D LIKE TO POSE THIS QUESTION AND JUST BEING VERY TRANSPARENT, BASED ON THE CURRENT NEIGHBORHOOD THAT YOU ALL HAVE, WOULD HAVE BEEN THE BIGGEST COMPLAINTS THAT THE RESIDENTS HAVE GIVEN YOU GUYS THAT YOU'VE HEARD. AND DON'T SAY THERE AREN'T ANY GREAT ESTATES. THE BIG ONE WAS THE THE FIRE LANES THAT WE IMPOSED.THAT WAS THE BIGGEST CONCERN BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, THAT IT TOOK AWAY SOME OF THE PARKING FOR THE FOR THE FOR THE HOMEOWNERS. SO THAT WAS OUR BIGGEST ISSUE. AND SO IT'S GOING TO BE AN ISSUE. BUT ON THESE HOMES. BUT IT'S SOMETHING YOU JUST GOT TO DEAL WITH. NOW LET ME JUMP IN ON THIS ONE. THERE'S AN IMPROVEMENT THAT WE'VE LEARNED BASED ON BASED ON WHAT HE'S SAYING. THESE STREETS. THE OTHER THE OTHER DEVELOPMENT INCLUDES A 28 FOOT PRIVATE STREET. THIS ONE IS GOING TO INCLUDE A 50 FOOT. I WOULD CALL IT RIGHT OF WAY. IT'LL BE A PRIVATE RIGHT OF WAY WITH A 28 FOOT BACK TO BACK OR CONCRETE CURB STREET MEETING STREET CITY STANDARDS AND NOT ONLY THE PAVEMENT, BUT ALSO THE UTILITIES TO MAKE SURE THAT THE LIFESPAN IS LONG ENOUGH NOT TO WORRY ABOUT IT ANYMORE. SO BASED ON WHAT HE SAID, YES, THAT WAS A CONCERN ON THE PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT, BUT ON THIS ONE WE HAVE IMPROVED IT.
THIS ONE ALSO INCLUDES TWO POINTS OF ACCESS FOR FIRE PROTECTION. THE ONLY THE OTHER ONE ONLY INCLUDED ONE. EVEN THOUGH WE SHOWED HOW THE TRUCK IS ABLE TO GET IN INGRESS AND EGRESS THIS ONE, WE LEARNED THE LESSONS AND WE IMPROVED THE BASED ON THAT. OKAY, SIR, CAN YOU PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME? FOR THE RECORD, MY NAME IS JUAN CASTILLO. I'M THE DESIGN ENGINEER. THANK YOU. OKAY, I'M GOING TO PUT FIRE CHIEF PARTIDA ON THE SPOT HERE BECAUSE THAT'S A BIG DEAL. YOU KNOW, ALL WE NEED IS ONE BIG FIRE, AND. AND THEY CAN'T, YOU KNOW, THEY CAN'T HAVE ACCESS. SO I WANT TO HEAR FROM OUR FIRE CHIEF. BASED ON THE LAST DEVELOPMENT, HAVE YOU ALL WHAT HAVE BEEN THE CHALLENGES THAT Y'ALL HAVE FACED GOING INTO THAT DEVELOPMENT? AND WHAT DO YOU SEE WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING NOW? ANY CHALLENGES? GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. WE WE DON'T SEE ANY CHALLENGES WITH THIS ONE BECAUSE IT DOES HAVE THE TWO POINTS OF ACCESS THAT ARE REQUIRED. WE'D HAVE TO CERTAINLY WAIT FOR THE FINAL DESIGN TO COME BEFORE US TO IDENTIFY ANY SETBACKS OR ANY ISSUES FOR OUR ACCESS. BUT LIKE I SAID, I THINK THESE STREETS, SOME OF THESE ARE, YOU KNOW, KIND OF DESIGNED TO CITY STANDARDS, BUT WE'LL HAVE TO EVALUATE THE PLANS WHEN THEY COME IN. OKAY. AND SO WE'LL MAKE SURE THAT THEY MEET THE FIRE CODE REQUIREMENTS. OKAY. SO GIVEN THAT I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE FIRE CHIEF AND HIS DEPARTMENT HAS SIGNED OFF ON THEY HAVE THEY HAVE. WELL, WHEN HE SIGNED THE FINAL RIGHT. THE FINAL FINAL RIGHT. YES. AND SO THIS WILL COME BACK BEFORE US. CORRECT. NOT IN THE FINAL VERSION. SO THIS IS JUST FOR THE ZONING PORTION, OKAY.
THEY'LL COME BACK THROUGH THE PERMITTING WHICH WILL NOT COME BACK BEFORE THIS BODY OKAY. SO SAY THAT AGAIN. YOU SAID WHICH ONE WHICH WILL NOT COME BACK BEFORE THIS BODY. SO I'M OKAY.
I'M OKAY WITH IT. AS LONG AS YOU PUT YOUR IF YOUR EYES ON IT, IT'S BEEN REVIEWED AND IT PASSES. YES. OKAY. OUR REQUIREMENTS OKAY. AND THAT IS THAT CONCLUDES MY QUESTIONS.
THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU I DO HAVE SOME FEW QUESTIONS FOR YOU JENNIFER. YOU KNOW THIS THIS WHOLE THING RIGHT HERE. WELL I'M I HAVE A CONCERN. THAT'S TOO MANY HOMES. THAT'S TOO NARROW LOT. YOU HAVE PEOPLE PARKING ON THE STREETS AND THEN FIRE TRUCKS TRYING TO GET IN, IN AND OUT, OR EMERGENCY VEHICLES TRYING TO GET IN AND OUT. SO THAT'S ONE. TWO. HAVE WE LOOKED AT THAT OR WHAT'S THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THESE HOMES? 1800 TO ABOUT 2000 1800 TO 2000.
SO IS THIS A ZERO LOT OR. YEAH, IT'S NOT A ZERO LOT. I'M SORRY. OKAY. AND THEN I HEARD I HEARD YOU SAY THAT IT'S GOING TO BE A BRICK OR NOW THEY'RE MOVING TOWARDS. WHAT'S THAT OTHER FINISH STUCCO. WHICH ONE IS IT. THESE ARE GOING TO BE BRICK. IT'S GOING TO BE THE EAST SIDE
[00:35:02]
DEVELOPMENT WAS STUCCO OKAY. SO I GO BACK TO CITY MANAGER AND AND JENNIFER IS THAT YOU KNOW WE HEAR ALL OF THIS. AND THEN BY THE TIME THE PRODUCT IS DONE, SO DO WE HAVE A CONTROL OF WHAT HE'S SAYING HERE TODAY IS WHAT HAPPENS ON THE SITE PLAN. YES. AND SO THAT'S WHAT'S PRESENTED IN THE ORDINANCE THAT THIS CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN WOULD BE ATTACHED TO THE ORDINANCE AND THE LAYOUT WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THAT. THEY WOULD STILL HAVE TO COMPLY WITH ALL BUILDING AND FIRE CODES. BUT THE LAYOUT, THE CONCEPT LAYOUT WOULD THEY WOULD HAVE TO ADHERE TO THE BUILDING DESIGN WOULD NOT BE WRITTEN INTO THE ORDINANCE. SO THE DEVELOPER'S EXPRESSING WHAT THAT PRODUCT TYPE WOULD LOOK LIKE. BUT WHAT WE WOULD REGULATE WOULD BE THE SETBACKS, THE LOT AREA SIZE AND THE CONFIGURATION OF THE LAYOUT. OKAY, I'M GOING TO YIELD BACK FOR NOW, RECOGNIZING MAYOR PRO TEM BROWN WATCH. THANK YOU. MAYOR DID DID YOU GUYS DEVELOP THE ONES ACROSS THE STREET AS WELL? OKAY. SO NOW I HAVE THAT PART. I'M CLEAR ON THAT. NOW, JUST A QUESTION. WHY DIDN'T YOU COME BACK WITH THE SAME STYLE FOR THIS? WHY ARE YOU CHANGING THE STYLE JUST. RIGHT NOW WITH THE. PRODUCT? I DON'T THINK WE CAN ON THOSE MODERN HOMES. IT'S.IT'S HARDER TO SELL A LARGE AMOUNT OF THOSE KIND OF HOMES. OKAY. YOU MIGHT ON A SMALLER DEVELOPMENT, YOU CAN GET 15 PEOPLE TO BUY VERY CONTEMPORARY NICE. YOU KNOW, UNIQUE HOMES. I WAS I WAS A CUSTOM BUILDER FOR A LONG TIME BEFORE WE STARTED DOING SUBDIVISIONS. SO YOU'LL GET THESE PEOPLE THAT HIRE US TO BUILD THOSE KIND OF HOMES. BUT I DON'T THINK YOU CAN GET 39 PEOPLE TO BUY CONTEMPORARY HOMES. IT'LL JUST TAKE LONGER. SO YOU JUST KIND OF GO BY YOUR BIGGEST POOL OF PEOPLE THAT WANT BRICK HOMES. OKAY? BUT THEY'LL STILL BE NICE. THEY'LL STILL BE. THEY'LL STILL BE NICE. SO I'M TAKING A LOOK AT THE RENDERINGS. YES. THESE ARE THE RENDERINGS THAT YOU GUYS SUBMITTED. YES. AND I'M I'M REALLY A VERY VISUAL PERSON. SO WHEN THE MODERN HOMES WENT IN, I REALLY DIDN'T SEE THAT THEY FIT WITH WHAT WAS CURRENTLY ON THE GROUND. BUT NOW THAT THEY'RE THERE, I'VE GOTTEN USED TO LOOKING AT. YEAH. SO IT WOULD JUST BE A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO KIND OF TRANSCEND THAT, SINCE THEY'RE BOTH KIND OF DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM EACH OTHER. BUT I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.
WHAT TYPE OF HOME WOULD YOU CONSIDER THIS? BECAUSE YOU TALKED ABOUT AFFORDABILITY? AND IS IT YOUR OPINION THAT AFFORDABILITY IS NOW AT THE 450 MARK? IT'S MORE AFFORDABLE.
THESE I MEAN, THE AREAS OF PREMIUM AREA. SO THESE ARE GOING TO BE, AGAIN THE HOMES WE PUT IN KIND OF NICER FINISHES FRAMELESS SHOWERS, QUARTZ COUNTERTOPS, THE NICE STUFF PEOPLE WANT. LIKE IF YOU WERE BUILDING A NICE CUSTOM HOME ON YOUR OWN LOT. WE JUST DO IT AT A MASS LEVEL THAT GOES IN AND OUT. AND SO PEOPLE STILL WANT THE NICE STUFF. IT LOOKS LIKE A CUSTOM BUILT HOME INSIDE AND IT HAS THE FEEL OF IT, BUT WITHOUT HAVING TO PAY CUSTOM PRICE BECAUSE WE'RE BUILDING, YOU KNOW, 13 HOMES AT THE SAME TIME. SO RATHER THAN US SPENDING OUR TIME DOING ONE AT A HOUSE AT A TIME, WE JUST SPEND SIX MONTHS, FIVE MONTHS BUILDING 13. OKAY, MY LAST QUESTION. CAN I GET THE FIRE CHIEF BACK UP? ONE YES, MA'AM. EXCUSE ME. YES, MA'AM.
THANK YOU FOR COMING BACK UP. YES. SO, CONSIDERING THAT THESE ARE GOING TO BE PRIVATE STREETS, WHAT IS THE WIDTH OF THE STREET? 28 FOOT. OKAY. WILL THE FIRE APPARATUSES BE SAFE TO GO IN BETWEEN WITH STREET PARKING? YES, WE HAVE TO. WE MIGHT HAVE TO TAKE A LOOK AT THAT ON SOME OF THE PUBLIC PARKING OR THE STREET PARKING TO MAKE SURE WE HAVE ENOUGH WIDTH, BECAUSE ON OUR NORMAL STREETS WE HAVE ENOUGH EVEN WHEN TWO CARS ARE PARKED ON BOTH SIDES. AND THAT'S WHY I WAS ASKING. COUNCIL MEMBER CLOUSER BROUGHT IT UP EARLIER IN REGARDS TO THAT, BECAUSE IF WE GET IN BECAUSE THE STREETS ARE GOING TO BE SO NARROW AND WITH CARS PARKED THERE THAT THERE COULD POSSIBLY BE AN ISSUE THERE, RIGHT? WE'LL HAVE TO ADDRESS IT WITH LEGAL AND ADDRESS IT THROUGH ORDINANCE FOR POTENTIAL. SOME SIGNAGE ON ONE SIDE WHERE THEY CAN ONLY PARK ON ONE SIDE. AND I GUESS MY OH I'M SORRY SHASHI. SO I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY. MAYOR PRO TEM, THESE STREETS ARE THE WIDTH OF A STANDARD STREET CURB TO CURB.
THERE ARE 28FT. THE RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATED IS 50FT. SO IT'S ANY OTHER LOCAL STREET THAT YOU
[00:40:02]
SEE ON IN A TYPICAL SUBDIVISION. SO THAT IS DESIGNED WITH THE INTENT TO PASS AN EMERGENCY VEHICLE. OKAY. GOOD. SO NOT 20, 28, 28. YEAH, THAT'S WHAT I SAID. OH I DIDN'T HEAR THE EIGHT OKAY. I DIDN'T HEAR THE EIGHT. OKAY. IF IN THE EVENT THAT WE FIND THAT THERE WILL BE SOME TYPE OF CURB RADIUS PROBLEMS OR ISSUES WHILE WE'RE AT THE PROCESS OF WRITING IN THAT PRIVATE STREETS HAVE A MAINTENANCE FUND OR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND TO TAKE CARE OF THAT AND BE PREPARED FOR 20 YEARS OUT. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO ADD NO STREET PARKING. SO THE CURRENT PROPOSED ORDINANCE DOES PROVIDE THAT THE HOA WILL RESTRICT LONG TERM PARKING ON THE PRIVATE STREETS. OH, FANTASTIC. OKAY, SO IT'S ALREADY THERE. THAT'S REALLY GOOD. YOU DIDN'T DO ANY PARK LAND. WAS THERE ANY PARTICULAR REASON WHY THERE IS A REASON.AND AND THE REASON IS BECAUSE THERE'S, I THINK THE MINIMUM FOR DEDICATING PARKLAND IS AN ACRE. AND SO IN LIEU OF THIS SITE IS ONLY FIVE. SO IN LIEU OF THAT WE JUST OPTED FOR THE FEE. OKAY. THAT'S FAIR ENOUGH. THANK YOU. MR. JEFFRIES HAD ASKED FOR MORE MONEY FOR PARKS, SO IT'LL COME FROM US. OKAY. SO YOU GUYS ARE GOING TO DOUBLE YOUR PARKING. MAY AS WELL WRITE THAT IN. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, COUNCILMEMBER O'DEKIRK. THANK YOU. AND AND YEAH, THAT NEW PARKLAND BUDGET IS WAS QUITE HEFTY. SO YOU'RE SLIPPING UNDER THE THE THE WIRE RIGHT HERE. SO BE GRATEFUL FOR THAT. BUT MY QUESTION IS I DON'T THINK I'VE MISSED SOMEWHERE WHY THIS THESE THIS SECTION NECESSITATES PRIVATE STREETS. WHAT WHY IS THIS GATED. YES, IT IS GATED. WE'RE PLANNING ON MAKING IT GATED. OKAY. SO I YOU KNOW, I'M LOOKING HERE LIKE WHERE'S THE GATE GOING TO BE? BECAUSE IF YOU'RE COMING OFF OF VICKSBURG, WE DON'T HAVE TO. YEAH. IT'S THAT'S SO PART OF THE PRIVATE STREET DESIGNATION IS TO BE ABLE TO USE IT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES. AND SO THERE MAY BE A DESIGN FACTOR THAT SOME OF THE DRAINAGE MIGHT BE CONTAINED IN SOME OF THE STREET RIGHT OF WAY. I APPRECIATE I APPRECIATE THAT BECAUSE LOOKING AT COMING OFF OF VICKSBURG, HAVING A GATE, YOU CAN'T PUT IT IN THE MIDDLE OF SOMEBODY'S HOUSE. AND I'M LOOKING AT THE PLAT. AND SO THAT, I MEAN, YOU CAN'T HAVE PEOPLE SITTING ON VICKSBURG WAITING FOR A GATE TO OPEN. THAT'S NOT PRACTICAL TO ME. AND THEN ON THE OTHER SIDE, WE HAVEN'T INCORPORATED THE GATE YET. YEAH, OKAY. WE CAN WE CAN PROBABLY TAKE IT OUT. YEAH. I THINK HE JUST SAID ONE OF THE REASONS WE DID IT ALSO IS FIRE PROTECTION. I THINK THERE'S TWO REASONS. SO I GUESS IT'S NOT THE REASON. SO EVEN THOUGH YOU MIGHT THIS IS ACTUALLY WE'RE DEDICATING 50 FOOT FOR THE STREET EVEN THOUGH IT'S IT'S ACTUALLY GOING TO BE 28. YEAH. BUT YOU'RE CONSIDERING THE RIGHT OF WAY. THE TEN FOOT SETBACKS. YEAH. RIGHT THERE. YEAH. THAT THAT TO ME IS NOT THAT'S NOTHING THAT DOESN'T COUNT 28FT IS WHAT YOU'RE, YOU'RE SAYING. BUT I'M TALKING ABOUT THE ENTRANCES HERE. I MY MIND WENT STRAIGHT TO GATED WHEN WE SAID PRIVATE ROADS. AND NOW I UNDERSTAND THE UTILITY REASONING BEHIND IT, BUT I, I WOULD PREFER NOT TO SEE A GATED COMMUNITY HERE BECAUSE I SEE PEOPLE WAITING IN THE STREET FOR THE GATES TO OPEN WITH THE SHORT ACCESS THAT YOU HAVE ON THESE. SO I'M GOOD. I'M GOOD. OKAY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. YEAH. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.
RECOGNIZING COUNCILMEMBER BOWEN. THANK YOU. MAYOR, I JUST WANTED TO POINT OUT AND THANK YOU.
THIS IS A TIME WHERE I RECEIVED THE CASH IN LIEU BECAUSE MUD 48 ACTUALLY IS. THEY BOUGHT THE LAND TO THE LEFT OF YOUR PROPERTY AND ARE PLANNING A PARK TO BE THERE. AND SO. YOU KNOW, ACROSS THE STREET. YEAH. SO DOUBLE THE MONEY. WELL, LET ME KNOW. WE GET THE CASH FOR SURE, YOU KNOW. OKAY. THAT HELPS OUR, OUR SALES. SO IT'S I'M HAPPY TO. HOW SOON CAN Y'ALL START. WELL THEY GOT 48. THEY'RE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR IS IT. SO THERE'S BEEN A WHAT WAS YOUR MOTION. CAN YOU STATE YOUR MOTION ONE MORE TIME. YES, SIR. MAYOR. IT WAS TO APPROVE THE RECOMMENDED OTHER RECOMMENDATION FOR THE PD WITH THE AMENDMENT OF THE WHAT DID WE CALL IT? I WANT TO CALL IT THE RIGHT THING PROVIDING FOR A RESERVE FUND FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE RESERVE FUND. YES, FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF PRIVATE STREETS. THANK YOU.
[00:45:01]
IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND? COUNCILMEMBER. COUNCILMEMBER SECOND. OKAY, SO THERE'S BEEN A MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER BONEY, SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER EMERY. SEEING AND HEARING NO OTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS. WE'LL GO AHEAD AND VOTE. ROLL CALL. MAYOR. YEAH. MEMBER. BROWN.MARSHALL. YES. MEMBER. CLOUSER. YES. MEMBER. RILEY. YES. MEMBER. BONEY. YES. MEMBER. ODENKIRK.
YES. MEMBER. EMERY. YES. THE MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH.
[(1) Public Hearing - Second and Final Public Hearing - To receive comments...]
THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ITEM 7BA PUBLIC HEARING AND RELATED ACTION 7B1 IS A PUBLIC HEARING.SECOND AND FINAL PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS FOR OR AGAINST THE ANNEXATION OF PORTION OF MY COUSIN. YES, YES, WE SEE THE BROMANCE BACK THERE. 7B1 PUBLIC HEARING IS A SECOND AND FINAL PUBLIC HEARING TO RECEIVE COMMENTS FOR OR AGAINST THE ANNEXATION OF A PORTION OF MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS. YES, SIR. AND SO THIS IS THE SECOND PUBLIC HEARING OF THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF A PORTION OF THE SIENNA MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. I WON'T GO THROUGH EACH SLIDE. WE DID GO THROUGH THAT AT THE SPECIAL MEETING, AND THAT WILL BE AVAILABLE, AS WELL AS THE SLIDES ON THE CITY'S WEBSITE. AS MENTIONED, THIS IS A PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO TAKE IN ABOUT THREE MULTIFAMILY COMPLEXES ALONG SIENNA PARKWAY AND FORT BEND PARKWAY. THE CITY WOULD BE ANNEXING THESE PORTIONS, FOR WHICH NOTICE WAS PROVIDED TO PURCHASE PURCHASERS BY THE SIENNA MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, AND AGAIN, THE CITY WOULD BE UNDERGOING THIS PROCESS IN ORDER TO HOPEFULLY ERADICATE SOME OF THE CONFUSION THAT EXISTS RELATING TO LAND USE REGULATIONS IN THE AREA. A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY, THE EASTERN PROPERTY, IS ALREADY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY'S LIMITED PURPOSE AREA, AND THERE IS A COST BENEFIT FOR ANNEXING THIS LAND AT THIS TIME. ADDITIONALLY, THE CURRENT STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT WITH THE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT DOES EXPIRE IN 2026. AS MENTIONED AT THE SPECIAL MEETING, THE CITY WOULD NOT BE TAKING ON ANY OF THE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT'S DEBT OR ASSETS BECAUSE THE CITY WOULD NOT BE DISSOLVING THE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. THE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT WOULD CONTINUE TO EXIST. THE ESTIMATED TAXES THAT THE CITY MAY GARNER FROM THIS ACQUISITION ARE A NET OF ABOUT $540,000, AS REQUESTED IN THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED TO THIS COUNCIL AT FIRST READING, WHICH WILL INCLUDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE THE POPULATION OF THE AREA AND A FEW OTHER ITEMS. ARE THERE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? IF NOT, I WILL THANK YOU. COUNCIL. SO IS THERE A MOTION? THERE IS NO ACTION. THERE'S NO ACTION? NO, SIR. THIS IS ONLY A PUBLIC HEARING. OKAY. SO I WOULD HAVE TO OPEN THIS ONE. YES. YEAH. SO. ALL RIGHT WE'LL NOW CALL THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR ITEM 7B1 CITY. DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS? NO, SIR. WE DO NOT. OKAY. THERE'S NO FURTHER COMMENTS. WE'LL NOW GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING 7B1. OKAY. ITEM EIGHT A.
[(a) Consideration and Possible Action- Interlocal Agreement with Fort Bend...]
CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH FORT BEND COUNTY FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS TO A PORTION OF KNIGHTS COURT FROM STATE HIGHWAY SIX TO THOMPSON FERRY ROAD. WE HAVE PRESENTATION BY JOY JOHNSON, INTERIM DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. JOY. GOOD EVENING. I DO NOT HAVE A FORMAL PRESENTATION, BUT I'LL JUST DISCUSS. THIS IS A INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH FORT BEND COUNTY AND THE CITY OF MISSOURI CITY TO PERFORM DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR REPAIR FOR KNIGHTS COURT FROM THOMPSON FERRY ROAD TO, I MEAN, FROM HIGHWAY SIX TO THOMPSON FERRY ROAD. AND THE AGREEMENT IS IN THE AMOUNT OF $1.5 MILLION FOR TO PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR THE DESIGN AND THE CONSTRUCTION. THAT WILL INCLUDE A MAST ARM AND STRIPING FOR A MIDDLE TURN LANE ON KNIGHTS COURT. SO WE ASK THE THE COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT. ALL RIGHT.[00:50:08]
SO IS THERE A MOTION? YEAH. GO AHEAD. OKAY. YOU SAID THE 1.5 MILLION IS OUR COST. OR IS THIS THIS IS THIS IS THE COUNTY'S CONTRIBUTION AND IT IS THE TOTAL COST FOR THE PROJECT. IF WE WE ARE NOT TO EXCEED, IF WE DO EXCEED, IT WILL BE CITY'S COST TO INCUR. BUT THE GOAL IS TO STAY WITHIN THE COST. THE WE'VE ALREADY IDENTIFIED AREAS AND THE WORK THAT WE ANTICIPATE AND HAVE DONE PREVIOUS ESTIMATES FOR IT, SO WE ANTICIPATE IT TO STAY WITHIN THE 1.5 MILLION. DO YOU KNOW WHICH PRECINCT THIS FALLS UNDER? 2 OR 3. I DON'T KNOW WHICH PRECINCT THREE. IT'S THREE. OKAY. MY QUESTION. ALL RIGHT. ANYONE ELSE? YES. OKAY. GO AHEAD. COUNSELOR. SO JOY, IF THERE IF THERE ARE INCREASED COSTS, WHAT WOULD WHAT WOULD WHAT SCENARIOS WOULD THERE BE INCREASED COST. SO THE ONLY THING THAT WOULD COME UP IS IF WE ENCOUNTER IF WE WANT TO ADD LANDSCAPING, IRRIGATION, THOSE LIGHTING, MAYBE A HIKING BIKE TRAIL, THOSE WOULD BE VERY INCREASED COST. BUT THAT'S OUTSIDE OF THE SCOPE OF WORK.SO OUR SCOPE OF WORK IS FOR THE DESIGN FOR THE STRIPING. SO WE WANT WE'RE GOING TO STAY WITHIN THAT SCOPE OF WORK OKAY. AND CITY MANAGER JONES, IF WE DID GO OVER I'M THINKING WORST CASE SCENARIO, IF WE DID GO OVER THIS BUDGET, WHERE WOULD THAT COME FROM? AND WOULD WE HAVE THE CAPACITY, THE FINANCIAL CAPACITY TO HANDLE ANY OVERAGES? AND I'M JUST THINKING WORST CASE SCENARIO, WELL, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WOULD COME FROM OUR STREETS OR MOBILITY FUNDS THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE EVALUATED BASED ON WHATEVER THE PRIORITIES ARE. OKAY. OKAY. IS THERE A MOTION? NOT YET. OH, THIS IS A. RECOGNIZE COUNCILMEMBER BONEY, DID YOU HAVE YOUR HAND MAKING THE MOTION AT THE SAME TIME? ALL RIGHT. SO WHO MADE THE MOTION? I'LL MAKE THE MOTION OKAY. SO I'LL SECOND OKAY. SO WE HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER RILEY, SECONDED BY MAYOR PRO TEM BROWN. MARSHALL, SEEING NO ONE ELSE. AND I WAS ALMOST AT Q BUT GO AHEAD, CALL FOR MAYOR. YES. MEMBER. BROWN. MARSHALL. YES. MEMBER. CLOUSER. YES. MEMBER.
RILEY. YES. MEMBER. BONY. YES. YES. MEMBER. EMERY. YES. THE MOTION CARRIES 7 TO 0. ALL
[(b) Consideration and Possible Action- Interlocal Agreement with Fort Bend...]
RIGHT. THANK YOU. ITEM EIGHT B OUR CONSIDERATION AND POSSIBLE ACTION IN A LOCAL AGREEMENT WITH FORT BEND COUNTY FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS TO PORTIONS OF GLEN LAKES LANE AND RIDGEVIEW DRIVE TO COMMUNITY PARK DRIVE. JOY JOHNSON. YES, THIS IS AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH FORT BEND COUNTY AND THE CITY OF MISSOURI CITY FOR A AMOUNT THAT THE COUNTY WILL CONTRIBUTE OF $3 MILLION FOR DESIGN A REAL REHABILITATION FOR AREAS ON GLEN LAKE, AND FROM HIGHWAY WELL FROM RIDGEVIEW TO COMMUNITY PARK. WE'VE ALREADY DONE THE PORTION FROM HIGHWAY SIX TO RIDGEVIEW. EXCUSE ME, THE COUNTY HAS DONE THAT PORTION. SO THIS IS AN INTERIM DESIGN AND REHABILITATION OF PARTS OF GLEN LAKES UNTIL THE FULL RECONSTRUCTION OF GLEN LAKES IS APPROVED BY THE FORT BEND COUNTY MOBILITY BOND PROGRAM, WHICH THAT IS ESTIMATED AT 14 MILLION TO DO THE FULL. BUT IN THE INTERIM, THE CITY WANTS TO AGREE WITH GOING HAVE AN AGREEMENT WITH FORT BEND COUNTY TO DO PORTIONS OF GLEN LAKES UNTIL WE DO THE FULL REHAB. AND THAT AMOUNT IS NOT TO EXCEED $3 MILLION. ALL RIGHT. RECOGNIZING MAYOR PRO TEM BROWN MUSHROOM. THANK YOU. HI, JOY. I JUST HAD A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS WITH REGARDS TO THE GLEN LAKES. DO YOU KNOW HOW LONG IT WOULD POTENTIALLY BE BEFORE FORT BEND COUNTY WILL MOVE FORWARD WITH THE FULL RECONSTRUCTION OF THAT AREA, THE FULL RECONSTRUCTION? SO I DO NOT HAVE THAT EXACT DATE, BUT I CAN TELL YOU WHEN WE HAVE 90 DAYS, ONCE THIS AGREEMENT IS EXECUTED, WE HAVE 90 DAYS TO START THE CONSTRUCTION. I MEAN, THE DESIGN. AND THEN AFTER THAT ENTER INTO THE BID PHASE AND THE CONSTRUCTION JUST FOR THE REHABILITATION. BUT SHASHI HAS INFORMATION ON THE FULL. IF I CAN CLARIFY, I THINK YOUR[00:55:02]
QUESTION WAS, IF WE WERE TO DESIGN THIS, WHEN WOULD WE BUILD THE GLEN LAKES? YES. SO WHAT HAS HAPPENED IS, AS YOU ARE AWARE, MAYOR PRO TEM, WE BUILT A SMALL PIECE OF GLEN LAKES THAT IS COMPLETED. THIS IS THE BIGGER CHUNK OF GLEN LAKES, WHICH IS A 14 PLUS MILLION IN CONSTRUCTION. IN THE LATEST MOBILITY BOND PROGRAM, THE COUNTY, FORT BEND COUNTY, IS ALLOCATED ONLY 3 MILLION. AND THAT PRIMARILY COVERS THE DESIGN COST. BUT IN OUR DISCUSSION, CITY MANAGER AND I HAD WITH THE PRECINCT THREE OFFICE, ANY UNUSED FUNDS THEY'RE GOING TO ALLOCATE FOR SOME INTERIM REPAIRS UNTIL WE CAN BUILD OR RECONSTRUCT A PIECE OF THE GLEN LAKE. SO THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT IS WRITTEN IN A FLEXIBLE WAY. WE CAN DESIGN THE BIGGER SECTIONS, BUT ANY FUNDS AVAILABLE CAN BE USED FOR REPAIR OR REHABILITATION.BUT TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, MORE THAN LIKELY, IF THEY FUND THE DESIGN NOW IN THE NEXT MOBILITY BOND PROGRAM, THEY WILL LIKELY FUND THE CONSTRUCTION, WHICH IS TYPICALLY THEY DO EVERY FOUR YEARS. THE LAST ONE WAS 2024, RIGHT? LIKELY 2028. THANK YOU FOR THAT. THAT REALLY HELPS BECAUSE THERE ARE RESIDENTS OVER IN THAT AREA, INCLUDING MYSELF. WE DRIVE GLEN LAKES. IT IS IN PRETTY BAD SHAPE AND SO RESIDENTS ARE CONSTANTLY ASKING WHEN WILL THE REST OF IT BE COMPLETED? BUT TO AT LEAST HEAR THAT WE CAN GET SOME RELIEF.
WHILE IT MAY NOT BE TOTALLY PERFECT, THAT WILL HELP SOMEWHAT SO IN TERMS OF ONCE WE GET THE $3 MILLION AND WE TAKE CARE OF THE DESIGN PHASE, WHERE WILL THE FUNDING COME FOR THE FOR THE REPAIRS THAT WE CAN MAKE? POTENTIALLY FROM THIS PART OF THE MONEY, THE 3 MILLION. OH, OKAY. ALL THE DESIGN COSTS. WE'LL HAVE SOME MONIES LEFT THERE TO DO THE REPAIRS AS WELL. MY APOLOGIES. THAT'S THAT'S WHAT YOU WERE SAYING, THAT HOPEFULLY THE DESIGN PHASE WILL NOT COST THE ENTIRE 3 MILLION. AND IF IN THE. AND IF IT DOES TAKE THE ENTIRE 3 MILLION, I'LL GET WITH YOU, CITY MANAGER, TO SEE IF WE CAN FIND SOME MONEY SOMEWHERE TO MAKE SOME REPAIRS. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. RECOGNIZING COUNCIL MEMBER EMERY. YES. QUESTION I HAD IS WE TALK ABOUT. IT'S A, I GUESS A TEMPORARY FIX, IF YOU WILL, OF GLEN LAKES. ARE WE TALKING ABOUT FULL PANEL REPLACEMENTS AND MAKE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT, YOU KNOW, WE DON'T COME BACK AND START DOING POTHOLE REPAIRS INSTEAD OF PANEL REPLACEMENT BECAUSE WE'LL BE RIGHT BACK IN THE SAME CONDITION THAT WE'RE IN NOW. SO IS THAT THAT THE THE THE PLAN THE PLAN IS TO DO FULL PANEL REPLACEMENTS. YES. THAT'S REHABILITATION IS FULL PANEL REPLACEMENTS OKAY. AND WHO'S GOING TO DETERMINE WHICH AREAS WILL REQUIRE THE THE REPAIRS FOR THE PANEL REPLACEMENTS. SO WHEN WE WORK WITH THE DESIGN ENGINEER WE'LL DO A FULL DESIGN OF THE ENTIRE GLEN LAKES AND THEN PRIORITIZE THE AREAS THAT ARE MOST SEVERE THAT WILL WILL BE ABLE TO COVER WITHIN THE AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT WE HAVE ALLOCATED. WILL ANY OF THE WORK THAT WE'RE DOING AS FAR AS THE REPAIRS BE ABLE TO BE SALVAGED WHEN WE DO THE FULL REPLACEMENT OF ALL OF GLEN LAKE, SO WE'LL BE ABLE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF SOME OF THE PRELIMINARY OR UPFRONT WORK THAT WE'VE DONE. YES, YES. AND THAT'S WHY WE'RE DOING THE INTERIM WORK NOW IS TO GIVE SOME RELIEF, BECAUSE WE DO UNDERSTAND THE SEVERITY OF THE CONDITION OF GLEN LAKES. SO YES, THAT WORK WILL NOT. IT'LL LAST AS LONG 30 YEARS CONCRETE. AND SO WE'LL ABLE TO HAVE THAT WORK ALREADY DONE AND THEN ADD ON TO WHAT IS REMAINING FOR THE ENTIRE STREET. WELL IT WAS PART OF THE THE DESIGN, THE FINAL DESIGN GOING TO HAVE SIDEWALKS IN CERTAIN AREAS ALONG GLEN LAKES. I MEAN, THERE ARE SOME AREAS THAT HAVE THAT, BUT IT'S, YOU KNOW, IT'S IT'S VERY SMALL AREA OR THAT HAVE SIDEWALKS. NOW, IF YOU NEED SIDEWALKS IN AREAS WHERE THERE ARE NO SIDEWALKS, THAT MEANS YOU NEED ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY. SO MORE THAN LIKELY THERE WON'T BE ANY SIDEWALKS. BUT AGAIN, WE'VE NOT STARTED THE DESIGN. BUT WHERE THERE IS NO SIDEWALKS, I ENVISION THERE WON'T BE SIDEWALKS. I'M SORRY, WHAT WOULD WHAT WOULD DEMAND OR WARRANT SIDEWALKS? WELL, THE MAIN THING, IF YOU WANT TO BUILD SIDEWALKS, YOU HAVE A PARTICULAR RIGHT OF WAY. YOU NEED AN EXTRA 5FT OR 6FT. WHERE ARE YOU GOING TO GET THE LAND? FOR THE ADDITIONAL SIDEWALKS, YOU'LL HAVE TO GO INTO THE OMEN OR SLOT TO GET THOSE RIGHT OF
[01:00:04]
WAY, AND THAT'S GOING TO BE A VERY COMPLICATED TASK. SO WE'RE GOING TO SEE IF WE CAN SQUEEZE IN A SIDEWALK. BUT MORE THAN WHAT WE THINK IS IT MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY. IN THOSE INSTANCES, WE WILL NOT BUILD SIDEWALKS BECAUSE IT'S A VERY. INTENSIVE PROCESS TO ACQUIRE ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY TO BUILD SIDEWALKS. OKAY. WELL, AS YOU KNOW, THERE'S ALWAYS BEEN A DEMAND TO TRY TO PUT SIDEWALKS ALONG GLEN LAKES JUST BECAUSE OF THE TRAFFIC AND PEOPLE AND KIDS THAT USE GLEN LAKES AS A WAY TO GET BACK AND FORTH TO TO SCHOOLS. AND SO BUT GREAT POINT. I THINK WE'LL CHARGE THE DESIGN TEAM TO SEE IF THEY CAN FIGURE OUT A WAY TO INSTALL SIDEWALKS IF THERE IS AN OPTION FOR US TO INSTALL, WE'LL CERTAINLY CONSIDER THAT.OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY. ANYONE ELSE? ALL RIGHT. IS THERE A MOTION? SO MOVED. OKAY. SECOND. SECOND. OKAY. IT'S BEEN A MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM BROWN. MOTION SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER EMERY. SEEING NO ONE ELSE. HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? CALL FOR ROLL CALL.
MAYOR. ALLEYCAT. YES. MEMBER. BROWN. MARSHALL. YES. MEMBER. CLOUSER. YES. MEMBER. RILEY.
YES. MEMBER. BONEY. YES. MEMBER. KIRK. YES. MEMBER. EMERY. YES. THE MOTION CARRIES 7 TO 0. OKAY.
[(a) Consideration and Possible Action - A resolution authorizing the Mayor...]
THANK YOU. JOY. ALL RIGHT. ITEM NUMBER NINE, OUR RESOLUTIONS NINE, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MISSOURI CITY, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO CAST A VOTE FOR REGION 14, DIRECTOR OF THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CONTAINING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO. OKAY. RECOGNIZING CRYSTAL. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.MISSOURI CITY IS A MEMBER OF THE TEXAS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE, WHICH CONSISTS OF 18 REGIONS IN TEXAS. WE ARE A MEMBER OF REGION 14, WHICH CONSISTS OF THE SOUTHEAST TEXAS REGION, INCLUDING THE HOUSTON METRO AREA. HTML MEMBER CITY IS ENTITLED TO ONE VOTE THAT IS CAST BY A MAJORITY OF THE CITY'S GOVERNING BODY. FOR THIS YEAR, WE HAVE A SLATE OF CANDIDATES. ONE IS SALLY BRANSON, WHO IS A COUNCIL MEMBER FOR FRIENDSWOOD AND WHO IS ALSO THE INCUMBENT, ROBIN COLLINS, WHO IS THE MAYOR OF KEMAH. TOM CRUISE IS THE COUNCIL MEMBER FOR THE CITY OF LEAGUE CITY. EMMANUEL GUERRERO IS A COUNCIL MEMBER FOR THE CITY OF PASADENA. JOSH PRATT IS A COUNCIL MEMBER FOR THE CITY OF BUNKER VILLAGE. BUNKER HILL VILLAGE SORRY FRANK W ROBINSON, WHO IS A COUNCIL MEMBER FOR THE CITY OF SHENANDOAH. OKAY, THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. IS THERE A MOTION I'D LIKE TO MAKE A NOMINATION OF SALLY BRANSON, COUNCIL MEMBER FROM FRIENDSWOOD, FOR THIS POSITION. SHE'S CURRENTLY THE INCUMBENT. I HAVE HAD THE PRIVILEGE OF WORKING WITH HER ON THE HOUSTON GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL BOARD OF DIRECTORS. SHE'S BEEN ACTIVELY ENGAGED AND INVOLVED NOT ONLY WITH HDC, BUT WITH THE TML BOARD OF DIRECTORS, PARTICULARLY IN THIS REGION 14 DIRECTOR POSITION. I THINK THAT SHE'S DONE A GREAT JOB AND DESERVES TO BE REAPPOINTED. OKAY. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND? OKAY, SO THERE'S BEEN A MOTION AND A SECOND. ANY ANY QUESTIONS AND CONVERSATIONS. SO I DO HAVE ONE. DO WE DO WE TALK TO ANY OF THESE PEOPLE TO I KNOW THEY SEND YOU SEND US SOME FLIERS OR I DID TO US. RIGHT. BESIDES THAT, WAS THERE ANYTHING ELSE THAT THAT WE RECEIVED? NO. SO WE WE RECEIVED A BIO FOR EACH ONE OF THE CANDIDATES. AND THAT THAT IS ALL. OKAY, I YIELD BACK.
I RECOGNIZE THE MAYOR PRO TEM. I'LL YIELD. YOU ASKED MY QUESTION. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, SO THERE'S NO OTHER QUESTIONS. WE'LL GO AHEAD AND VOTE. OKAY, MAYOR. NO MEMBER. BROWN.
MARSHALL. YES. MEMBER. CLOUSER. NO. MEMBER. RILEY. NO. MEMBER. BONEY. YES. MEMBER. O'DEKIRK.
NO. MEMBER. EMERY. YES. THE MOTION FAILS. 4 TO 3. OKAY. IS THERE ANOTHER MOTION? YES, MAYOR, I HAVE A MOTION. I'D LIKE TO NOMINATE EMMANUEL GUERRERO. I'LL SECOND THAT MOTION. OKAY. IT'S BEEN A LOSES. MY MAN, GUERRERO. EMMANUEL GUERRERO, COUNCIL MEMBER FOR PASADENA. OKAY, SO THERE'S BEEN A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER CLOUSER AND SECONDED BY MAYOR PRO TEM BROWN. MARSHALL. SEE NO ONE ELSE ON THE ON THE NOT THE Q BUT ALL RIGHT, LET'S JUST CALL. OKAY. MAYOR ALLEYCAT. YES. MEMBER. BROWN. MARSHALL. YES. MEMBER. CLOUSER. YES. MEMBER.
RILEY. YES. MEMBER. BONEY. NO. MEMBER. O'DEKIRK. YES. MEMBER. EMERY. NO. THE MOTION CARRIES 5
[(b) Consider and Possible Action - A resolution approving the submission o...]
[01:05:01]
TO 2. OKAY. THANK YOU. ITEM NUMBER NINE. B A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MISSOURI CITY, TEXAS, APPROVING THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION TO THE US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS, BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE FOR FUNDING UNDER THE FISCAL YEAR 2025. COMMUNITY COMMUNITY BASED VIOLENCE INTERVENTION AND PREVENTION INITIATIVE DESIGNATING THE APPLICATION SUBMITTER AND THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE AND CONTAINING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATED THERETO. OKAY. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. GOOD EVENING. REQUESTING APPROVAL TO APPLY FOR THE OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS, COMMUNITY BASED VIOLENCE INTERVENTION AND PREVENTION INITIATIVE. THIS GRANT WOULD ALLOW US TO CREATE A CIVILIAN POSITION FOR IMMEDIATE ADMINISTRATOR SPECIFIC TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. THE GRANT WOULD COVER THE POSITION AT 100% NO MATCH FROM THE CITY FOR FOUR YEARS IN THE GRANT. IT ALLOWS FOR THE FIRST YEAR TO BE DONE FOR RECRUITING, HIRING, ONBOARDING, ALL OF THAT, AND THEN THE ADDITIONAL THREE YEARS AT 100% OF THE COST. AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. RACHEL, THERE'S A QUESTION BY COUNCILMEMBER. I HAVE A QUESTION. GO AHEAD. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SUBMISSION. OKAY. THERE'S BEEN A MOTION BY COUNCILMEMBER CLOUSER, SECONDED BY COUNCILMAN RILEY. ALL RIGHT. SEEING NO ONE ELSE. GO AHEAD. MAYOR. YES.MEMBER. BROWN. MARSHALL. YES. MEMBER. CLOUSER. YES. MEMBER. RILEY. YES. MEMBER. BONEY. YES.
MEMBER. O'DEKIRK. YES. MEMBER. EMORY. YES. THE MOTION CARRIES 7 TO 0. THANK YOU SO MUCH. OKAY, WELL, THANK YOU, THANK YOU. SO ITEM NUMBER 14 ARE CLOSED. EXECUTIVE SESSION. THERE'S NO CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION ON THIS ONE. SO WE ARE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND ADJOURN
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.