[00:00:09]
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TO ORDER AT 706 30. SORRY ABOUT THAT. LOOKS
[3. CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION]
LIKE WE DO HAVE A QUORUM. WE'RE MISSING ONE, COMMISSIONER, BUT I BELIEVE THAT HE'S ON HIS WAY.AGENDA ITEM NUMBER THREE ON HERE. IF THERE IS NO OBJECTION, THE TIME IS 630 IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WILL NOW GO INTO CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO SECTION
[4. RECONVENE]
[5. READING OF MINUTES]
COMN WILL NOW CONVENE INTO REGULAR SESSION AGENDA ITEM NUMBER FIVE.CONSIDER APPROVING THE MINUTES OF THE MAY 13TH, 2026 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. IS THERE A SECOND?
[a. Chair of the Planning and Zoning Commission]
SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND A SECOND ALL VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SIX REPORTS AND COMMENTS FROM PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. I'LL OPEN THE FLOOR. I JUST WANT TO SAY ONE THING. I'M AWARE OF THE FACT THAT THE CITY MANAGER IS MOVING ON, WANTS TO BE CLOSER TO FAMILY, AND I JUST WANTED TO TAKE AN OPPORTUNITY TO WISH THEM THE BEST. ANY OTHER COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS? WE'RE GOOD. WELL, LET'S MOVE ON TO[b. Engineering]
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SEVEN, STAFF REPORTS. I'D LIKE TO RECOGNIZE JENNIFER THOMAS GOMEZ. YOU HAVE THE FLOOR. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. DO NOT HAVE A REPORT. OKAY. THAT'S SEVEN A LET'S MOVE ON TO SEVEN B OF SHINZO. YOU HAVE THE FLOOR. GREAT. THANK YOU CHAIR. AND WHEN I GO TO THE NEXT. OKAY.THANK YOU. SO I WANT TO UPDATE THE COMMISSION ON THE STATUS OF OUR 2026 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN UPDATE. THE IT IS NOW BY ORDINANCE 2020. NOPE. GO BACK BY 26-16 AMENDED TO THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN. IT BASICALLY FOCUSED ON THE AREA. AND WHEN I BROUGHT THIS TO COMMISSION ON 513, THERE HAS BEEN SOME AMENDMENTS. SO I WANTED TO UPDATE THE COMMISSION ON WHAT CHANGED. SO BULLET POINT ONE BACK UP IS THAT ON 514, THERE WAS A SPECIAL MEETING.
WITH THE COUNCIL RIGHT AFTER THE PNC MEETING, AND THEN COUNCIL HAD ACTUALLY AMENDED AT THE FIRST READING, THE REMOVAL OF MCKEEVER ROAD CONNECTOR. AND THEN 518, THE SECOND READING. THANK YOU. THE SECOND READING OF THE COUNCIL, THEY ACTUALLY AMENDED IT DURING THAT READING TO ADD A NORTH SOUTH ROUTE THREE AND IN GRAPHICAL FORM. IN THE NEXT SLIDE, I'LL SHOW YOU WHAT WHAT I MEAN. SO THIS IS WHAT YOU YOU SAW THE COMMISSION SAW ON 513. THIS WAS PRESENTED TO YOU. AND DURING THE CITY COUNCIL READINGS, THE FIRST READING, THE VERY TOP WAS REMOVED. SO THEY DID NOT WANTED TO INCLUDE MCKEEVER ROAD CONNECTOR AND THEN THE SORT OF MIDDLE RIGHT CENTER AREA. THEY ADDED A ANOTHER NORTH SOUTH ROUTE. AND SO IT WOULD BE THIS IS WHAT IS EVENTUALLY THE FINAL MAP. AND THOSE ARE THE LOCATIONS OF THE CHANGES. THAT'S IT. I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE COMMISSIONER KNEW THAT WHEN WE RECOMMENDED THE COUNCIL, THEY MADE SOME AMENDMENTS TO WHAT YOU RECOMMENDED. OKAY, SO THAT WAS IT. THANK YOU. CHAIR. LOOKS LIKE WE ARE ON AGENDA ITEM NINE.
[8. PUBLIC COMMENT]
A THE CONSENT AGENDA LOOKS LIKE WE HAVE OH, I'M SORRY. PUBLIC COMMENTS. I'M SORRY. I'M GETTING AHEAD OF MYSELF. NINE EIGHT VANESSA DO WE HAVE ANYONE SIGNED UP? YES WE DO. PLEASE ADHERE TO THE THREE MINUTE TIME LIMIT AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. V BAUGH MOOROOKA. THANK YOU. HI, MY NAME IS VIBHOR MEHROTRA. I AM THE OWNER OF ARBO SIENNA TOWN CENTER, WHICH IS ONE OF THE SHOPPING CENTERS IN THE ANNEXATION. CNI AND ANNEXATION PLAN DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS THREE BUILDINGS, 27,000FT■!S TOTAL AN. WE BUILT THIS SHOPPING CENTER.[00:05:06]
WE HAVE A LOT OF USES IN THERE. AND THE PROPOSED LIST OF USES WHICH ARE IN THE MEMO, DOES NOT LINE UP WITH THE CURRENT USES WE HAVE IN THE SHOPPING CENTER, AS WELL AS SOME OF THE PROPOSED USES THAT WE HAVE RECOMMENDED FOR THE SHOPPING CENTER. WHEN WE INITIALLY BOUGHT THE LAND FROM JOHNSON DEVELOPMENT. SO WE HAVE WRITTEN A LETTER WHICH I BELIEVE WE WERE SUPPOSED TO DISCUSS WITH WITH THE CITY MEMBERS. AND I BELIEVE SOME OF YOU OR ALL OF YOU HAVE A COPY OF THAT LETTER. WHEN WE BOUGHT THE LAND FROM JOHNSON DEVELOPMENT, WE HAD CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS WHICH WERE PUT IN PLACE. AND THAT LETTER OUTLINES THE RESTRICTIONS THAT WERE PUT IN PLACE WHEN WE BOUGHT THE LAND FROM JOHNSON DEVELOPMENT. SOME OF THE PROPOSED USES THAT WE HAVE CURRENTLY DOES NOT INCLUDE CERTAIN PIECES THAT ARE CURRENTLY IN OPERATION. ONE OF THEM IS THE CONSIDERATION FOR A RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE THRU. WE CURRENTLY HAVE A RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE THRU IN THE SHOPPING CENTER. WE HAVE ACTUALLY THREE DRIVE THRUS IN THE SHOPPING CENTER. TWO OF THOSE DRIVE THRUS ARE OCCUPIED BY BY A COFFEE SHOP AND A BAKERY, AND THE THIRD DRIVE THROUGH IS OCCUPIED BY A RESTAURANT, WHICH IS WHICH SHOULD BE ALLOWED BASED UPON THE LAND THAT WE PURCHASED, BASED UPON THE RESTRICTIONS THAT USE WAS ALLOWED. SO WE PUT THAT USE IN PLACE SOME OF THE MEDICAL USES WHICH ARE REALLY BECOMING IMPORTANT THESE DAYS. 60% OF THE SHOPPING CENTER IS ACTUALLY MEDICAL IN, IN, IN THE CURRENT USES THAT WE HAVE. SO SOME OF THEM LIKE URGENT CARE. IF WE HAVE USED A LOT OF WE HAVE RECEIVED A LOT OF INQUIRIES ABOUT URGENT CARE. WE HAVEN'T SIGNED ANYBODY IN THE URGENT CARE BUSINESS BECAUSE WE WERE ALREADY FULL. BUT THERE'S A LOT OF NEED FOR IT IN THIS AREA, AND THAT IS KIND OF RESTRICTED FROM WHAT I READ IN THE CURRENT MEDICAL FACILITIES, OUTPATIENT USE ER CLINICS ARE COMING A LOT IN IN THIS KIND OF SHOPPING CENTERS. WE HAVE THREE BUILDINGS. ONE OF THE ONE OF THE BUILDINGS CAN BE TAKEN OVER BY AN ER IN THE FUTURE. AND WE RECOMMEND THAT WE INCLUDE ER AS WELL, WHICH IS NOT RESTRICTED BY OUR INITIAL PURCHASE OF THE LAND. SOME OF THE OTHER USES WHICH ARE QUITE RESTRICTIVE ARE THINGS LIKE ONLY TABLE SERVICE RESTAURANTS ARE ALLOWED. TIME, TABLE SERVICE RESTAURANTS ARE ALLOWED. AND I'M SORRY THAT'S YOUR TIME. BARS AND OTHERS HAVE TO BE ALLOWED AS WELL. OKAY, SO I REALLY WANT YOU TO REVIEW OUR LETTER AND SEE IF WE CAN. I DON'T I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT WE DO NOT VOTE TODAY. THANK YOU AND GIVE US AN OPPORTUNITY. ANYONE ELSE? WE DO NOT HAVE ANYONE ELSE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK.[a. CONSENT AGENDA]
THANK YOU. NOW WE CAN MOVE ON TO AGENDA ITEM NINE, THE CONSENT AGENDA. I SEE THAT THERE ARE THREE ITEMS ON HERE, BUT IT LOOKS LIKE STAFF HAS REQUESTED THAT ITEMS NINE A TWO AND NINE A THREE BE REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND BE CONSIDERED INDIVIDUALLY. I NEED A MOTION TO REMOVE THOSE ITEMS AND CONSIDER THEM INDIVIDUALLY. SECOND MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECOND, ALL CAN VOTE. LOOKS LIKE MOTION CARRIES. OKAY, LET'S GO DOWN. SO THE ONLY ITEM REMAINING ON THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM IS NINE A ONE. CONSIDER AN APPLICATION OF THE PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PARKWAY CROSSING DETENTION. THEIR MOTION MOTION. MOTION HAS BEEN MADE. AND SECOND, ALL CAN VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. OKAY, LET'S MOVE ON TO AGENDA ITEM NINE A TWO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION OF A FINAL PLAT OF FIFTH STREET PLAZA, AND I BELIEVE STAFF HAS A PRESENTATION. YES. GOOD EVENING. COMMISSIONERS. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING DISAPPROVAL FOR THIS PLOT BECAUSE AS THE PLAT IS SUBMITTED CURRENTLY, IT DOES NOT FULFILL ALL REQUIREMENTS IN THE PLATTING MANUAL AS APPROVED BY THE CITY IN FORM AND CONTENT. SO THINGS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, INCORRECT CERTIFICATES. THE NOTES ARE INCORRECT AND LOT LINES AND BUILDING LINES NEED TO BE REVISED. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY DISCUSSION? NEED A MOTION? MOTION TO JUST JUST SO THAT WE'RE CLEAR. THAT'S THE DISAPPROVE. OKAY. MOTION HAS[00:10:06]
BEEN MADE. AND SECOND, ALL CAN VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. OKAY. LET'S MOVE ON TO AGENDA ITEM NINE A THREE. CONSIDER AN APPLICATION OF A FINAL PLAT OF MURPHY VILLAGE COMMERCIAL REPLAT NUMBER ONE STAFF HAS A PRESENTATION. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. THE STAFF REPORT WAS UPDATED TO REMOVE A STAFF COMMENT REGARDING ZONING. ZONING IS IN PLACE. HOWEVER, THE PLAT REMAINS WITH THE RECOMMENDATION TO DISAPPROVE DUE TO THE FORM AND CONTENT IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLANNING MANUAL. THAT IS. THAT'S IT. THANK YOU. ANY DISCUSSION? ANY QUESTIONS? I NEED A MOTION TO.[b. Sienna]
DISAPPROVE. OKAY. MOTION HAS BEEN MADE. AND SECOND, ALL CAN VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. OKAY, LET'S SEE. HERE WE ARE DOWN TO ITEM NINE B ONE. CONSIDER AN APPLICATION OF A REVISED CONCEPT PLAN OF SIENNA FOR B. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. GOOD EVENING.ITEMS ONE THROUGH FIVE ARE BEING RECOMMENDED FOR DISAPPROVAL ON THE BASIS THAT EACH CONTRIBUTE TO A MAJOR TRAFFIC IMPACT THAT REDUCED THE LEVEL OF SERVICE ON AFFECTED ROADWAYS, AND THAT EACH DO NOT MEET REQUIRED CITY STANDARDS FOR CAPACITY AND CIRCULATION.
PER SECTION 82-151 AND 152. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS? MOTION. MOTION TO DISAPPROVE. YES. MADE. AND.
SECOND, ALL CAN VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. MOVING ON TO AGENDA ITEM NINE B CONSIDER AN APPLICATION OF A FINAL PLAT OF SIENNA. SECTION 74 STAFF HAS A PRESENTATION. THE SAME COMMENTS AS ITEM ONE. MOTION TO DISAPPROVE. YES. I CAN VOTE. OKAY, LET'S SEE HERE. WE'RE DOWN TO AGENDA ITEM. NINE B THREE. CONSIDER AN APPLICATION OF A REVISED CONCEPT PLAN OF SIENNA FOR C. SAME THING. SAME COMMENTS. OKAY. MOTION TO DISAPPROVE. I SEE I DON'T SEE THE OKAY. I SEE IT ON THERE. NOT ON MY SCREEN. I'LL VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. OKAY, SO WE ARE NOW DOWN TO AGENDA ITEM NINE B FOR MOTION TO DISAPPROVE. OKAY. I CAN VOTE. LET'S SEE HERE.
AGENDA ITEM NINE B FIVE. MOTION TO DISAPPROVE. I CAN VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. OKAY, NOW WE'RE DOWN TO AGENDA ITEM. NINE B SIX. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE APPLICANT'S REQUESTED 30 DAY EXTENSION. MOTION TO APPROVE. MOTION HAS BEEN MADE. AND SECOND, ALL CAN VOTE. MOTION CARRIES. OKAY LET'S SEE. WE ARE NOW DOWN TO ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS. B SEVEN IS 3 TO 7. 97 IS POSTPONED. OKAY. I'M SORRY, WE APPROVED THE EXTENSION. YES. SO NOT
[a. Residential Treatment Center (RTC) - Specific Use Permit]
POSTPONED. OKAY, OKAY. I'M TRYING TO MAKE MY NOTES HERE. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TEN, ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS. CONSIDERABLE AND POSSIBLE ACTION. ALRIGHTY. GOOD EVENING AGAIN COMMISSIONERS. GOOD EVENING. GOOD EVENING. HERE WE HAVE A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR THE LOCATION OF 1117 MESA VERDE DRIVE FOR A RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT CENTER. THE CURRENT[00:15:09]
ZONING IS R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND THE SGP IS REQUIRED DUE TO THE INSTITUTIONAL INSTITUTIONAL USE AND THE ADJACENCY TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING. THE APPLICATION INCLUDES A 24 HOUR RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT CENTER TO CARE FOR CHILDREN AGE TO, AGE 17 AND UNDER, AND TO PROVIDE 17 BEDS. THE CURRENT. THE EXISTING HOME PROVIDES FIVE BEDROOMS AND NO IMPROVEMENTS OR ADDITIONS ARE PROPOSED AT THIS TIME. THE TEXAS HUMAN RESOURCES CODE PERMITS CERTAIN COMMUNITY HOMES TO LOCATE WITHIN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS WITHOUT ADDITIONAL ZONING APPROVAL. WHEN THERE ARE NO. WHEN THERE ARE NO MORE THAN SIX RESIDENTS.INCLUDES UP TO TWO CAREGIVERS. PROVIDES SUPPORT SERVICES, MAINTAINS APPROPRIATE LICENSING AND IS NOT WITHIN ONE AND A HALF MILE OF ANOTHER QUALIFYING FACILITY. A RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT CENTER, RTC, IS ADMINISTERED BY THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES AND TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. IT PROVIDES RESIDENTIAL CARE FOR AT RISK CHILDREN WHILE SUPPORTING FAMILY CONNECTIONS. ALL FACILITIES MUST MEET GENERAL RESIDENTIAL OPERATIONS. MINIMUM STANDARDS AGAIN REQUIRES 24 HOUR SUPERVISION AND SUPPORTIVE SERVICES AND AGAIN MAINTAINS LICENSING REQUIREMENTS. THE PROPOSED USE IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2017 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN CHARACTERIZES THE SITE AS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER, AND THE PLAN RECOMMENDS TO PROTECT NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER BY ENSURING LAND USE COMPATIBILITY WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE. THE PROPOSED SITE IS IN PROXIMITY TO THE GATEWAY MIXED USE AREA OF TEXAS PARKWAY CORRIDOR. NOTICE WAS MAILED TO PROPERTY OWNERS ON MAY 4TH.
POSTED ON THE SITE ON MAY 14TH, AND THE ZONING PROPOSAL WAS FIRST HEARD BY THE COMMISSION AS WELL AS CITY COUNCIL ON MAY 26TH. STAFF RECOMMENDS A DISAPPROVAL FOR THE USES INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER, INCLUDING POTENTIAL INCREASE IN OCCUPANCY, STAFFING, TRAFFIC AND ACTIVITY. THE COMMISSION TONIGHT MAY MAKE A RECOMMENDATION. I'M SORRY, MAY PROVIDE A FINAL REPORT AND MAKE RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL.
AND CITY COUNCIL WILL CONSIDER THE AN ORDINANCE ON A TENTATIVE DATE OF JULY 20TH, 2026. AND THAT IS IT FOR THE PRESENTATION. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, THE APPLICANT IS NOT IN ATTENDANCE TONIGHT. THANK YOU. I DON'T SEE ANYONE IN THE QUEUE. ANY QUESTIONS? WE NEED TO BE CLEAR ON WHAT THE MOTION WILL BE. SO WE'RE MAKING A MOTION TO APPROVE FOR THIS APPROVAL.
MOTION TO DISAPPROVE. AGREE WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION TO DISAPPROVE. YES, WE'RE ALL CLEAR. YES. I SEE YOU MOTION. AND SECOND, WE CAN ALL VOTE. LOOKS LIKE THAT MOTION CARRIES.
[b. Sienna MD Annexation - Planned Development]
THANK YOU. OKAY, SO WE ARE NOW DOWN TO AGENDA ITEM. TEN A TEN, B ONE. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. GOOD EVENING. GOOD SIDE. ALL RIGHTY. SO I KNOW THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME YOU HAVE SEEN THIS APPLICATION. THIS IS A PROPOSAL TO AMEND 57 ACRES OF THE SIENNA MANAGEMENT DISTRICT THAT WAS ANNEXED BACK IN DECEMBER OF 2025. WHEN AN AREA IS ANNEXED INTO THE CITY, IT IS CLASSIFIED AS DE SUBURBAN DISTRICT UNTIL IT IS PERMANENTLY ZONED. SO THAT IS A PROPOSAL IN FRONT OF YOU THIS EVENING. AND THIS IS JUST FOR YOUR REFERENCE. AS FAR AS THE TRACKS, THEY'RE ALL LABELED BETWEEN TRACKS A ONE THROUGH FOUR AND SEVERAL HAVE SOME SOME TRACKS THAT WILL BE REFERENCED. SO I KNOW THIS WAS PRESENTED TO YOU ALL BACK IN APRIL. I BELIEVE THE RECOMMENDATION COMING OUT OF THAT MEETING WAS TO MAKE THE RECOMMENDATION IN THE STAFF REPORT A BIT MORE IN LINE WITH THE GATEWAY MIXED USE DISTRICT. SO STAFF AND BACK AND KIND OF ANALYZE THE USES THAT WERE BEING RECOMMENDED. AND SO IN FRONT OF YOU IS A SHEET THAT BASICALLY INCORPORATES ALL OF THE USES THAT ARE PERMITTED IN THE COMMERCIAL RETAIL ZONING DISTRICTS, LQT1, LQT2, AND LQT3. THOSE THAT ARE HIGHLIGHTED IN GREEN ARE THE USES THAT ARE BEING PROPOSED AND RECOMMENDED TO BE INCLUDED IN THIS PD, AND ALSO THOSE THAT ARE HIGHLIGHTED,[00:20:07]
I BELIEVE RED ARE THE ONES THAT WERE RECENTLY ADOPTED TO REQUIRE SUPERIOR APPROVAL, AND THAT WILL INCLUDE SOMETHING LIKE A CAR WASH. SO JUST AGAIN, A BRIEF OVERVIEW. THIS IS ONLY SPECIFIC TO THE TRACKS THAT ARE COMMERCIAL RETAIL. THAT INCLUDES TRACKS A1, A, B, C AND TRACKED A3. SOME OF THOSE ARE DEVELOPED AND SOME OF THEM ARE UNDEVELOPED. AND SO THE REGULATIONS ARE BEING PROPOSED. INCLUDE ANY MIX OF OFFICE USES, TABLE RESTAURANTS OR TABLE SERVICE, RESTAURANTS, BAKERIES, GIFT SHOPS, DANCE STUDIOS, AND BASICALLY ANY LOCAL AMENITIES.AND THEN THE CAR WASH IS A PROPOSED USE ALLOWED BECAUSE THERE IS ALREADY AN EXISTING CAR WASH WITHIN THIS AREA. AND SO JUST TO MAKE SURE WE ARE NOT CREATING ANY SORT OF NON-CONFORMING USE AND MAKING SURE THAT IT'S SPECIFIC TO THAT TRACT, WHICH IS TRACT A1, B. SO ANOTHER PART OF THE AMENDMENT BEFORE YOU TONIGHT INCLUDES SOME ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS. SO AS WAS EXPRESSED AND WANTING TO MAKE THIS A LITTLE BIT MORE ALIGNED WITH THE PROPOSED GATEWAY MIXED USE DISTRICT, THE INTENT OF THAT DISTRICT FOR THIS AREA IS TO KIND OF SIGNIFY IT AS AN ENTRY POINT INTO THE CITY. THIS IS ON THE SOUTH EAST AND WEST CORNERS OF FORT BEND PARKWAY AND SIENNA PARKWAY. AND PART OF THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS IS TO MAKE IT A FOCAL POINT, AN AREA OF THE CITY THAT YOU'RE COMING INTO. AND YOU KNOW, IT'S MISSOURI CITY, AND THAT INCLUDES INCORPORATING CERTAIN PLACEMAKING FEATURES. AND SO ONE OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS IS INCORPORATING SORT OF ELEMENTS IN THE STREETSCAPE THAT WOULD INCLUDE ANY SORT OF DECORATIVE LIGHTING, PUBLIC ART, SHADE STRUCTURES, JUST ANY SORT OF PLACEMAKING ACTIVITY FOR THE STREETSCAPE. ADDITIONALLY, REQUIRING PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL RETAIL AREA. SO MAKING SURE THAT THERE ARE AREAS THAT CONNECT THE BUILDING TO THE PARKING AREAS AND MAKING IT MORE PEDESTRIAN ORIENTED RATHER THAN AUTO ORIENTED. ANOTHER RECOMMENDATION IS ALSO THE OUTDOOR SPACES. SO ANY DEVELOPMENT COMING IN THAT IS PROPOSING 10,000FT■!S OR ABOVE O INCORPORATE AT LEAST ONE OUTDOOR SEATING, DINING OR GATHERING SPACE AND AGAIN MUST INCLUDE SOME SORT OF PLACEMAKING ELEMENT, SUCH AS LIKE A WATER FEATURE, SHADE STRUCTURES, ANY SORT OF OUTDOOR AREA. AND THEN MOVING ON TO ONE OF THE FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS ARE THE GATEWAY CORNER TRACK. SO THIS IS VERY SPECIFIC TO THE TWO TRACKS THAT ARE LOCATED DIRECTLY ON THE SOUTH EAST AND WEST CORNER OF THAT INTERSECTION. AGAIN, BECAUSE THIS IS THE ENTRYWAY OR ONE OF THE ENTRYWAYS INTO THE CITY, WANTED TO MAKE SURE IT'S IN GOOD POSITION TO MAKE IT A FOCAL POINT WHEN YOU'RE COMING INTO THE CITY. AND SO THAT WOULD REQUIRE ANY DEVELOPMENT COMING IN TO HAVE ENHANCED ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS, POSITIONING THE BUILDINGS TO KIND OF FRAME AND DEFINE THAT INTERSECTION, AND INCLUDING SOME GATEWAY FEATURES SUCH AS IT COULD BE TOWER, CLOCK, TOWER, MONUMENT, SOME SORT OF ART INSTALLATION WATER FEATURE. AGAIN, INCORPORATING THAT PLACEMAKING. AS YOU KNOW, PEOPLE ARE COMING THROUGH THE CITY. SO THE THIS WAS NOTICE PER STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. WE HAD A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING ON MARCH 23RD.
THIS WAS PRESENTED AS A STAFF REPORT BACK IN APRIL AND NOW BEING PRESENTED TO YOU AGAIN THIS EVENING. AS OF TODAY, WE HAVE ONLY RECEIVED ONE WRITTEN PROTEST LETTER. I BELIEVE THE PROTEST LETTER, IN SUMMARY, WAS TO ADD A LITTLE BIT MORE GREEN SPACE TO THE AREA OR MORE PARKS INTO SIENNA PARKWAY, AND THEN THE RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE STAFF REPORT AND PROVIDE A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL. AGAIN, THIS IS BEFORE YOU ALL TONIGHT AND THERE IF YOU ALL FEEL COMFORTABLE ON VOTING ON THE STAFF REPORT, YOU'RE MORE THAN WELCOME TO. BUT IF NOT, THIS CAN CERTAINLY BE BROUGHT BEFORE YOU AGAIN DURING NEXT MONTH'S PNC MEETING. AND THAT WRAPS UP MY PRESENTATION. I'LL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS.
THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS OR THANK YOU. OH I'M SORRY, IT'S NEW. SO WE GOT TO GET USED TO THAT DOING THIS Q THING. YES. THANK YOU. BECAUSE I COMPLETELY FORGOT. I DON'T BELIEVE IN THIS THING, BUT I'M GOING TO DO IT. OKAY. SO HE'S IN THERE. OKAY. SO ONE ONE I DON'T KNOW COMMENT.
CLASS CLARIFICATION. YOU HAVE TAILOR SHOPS IN HERE IN, IN GREEN, BUT THEN YOU HAVE DRESSMAKING MILLINERY AND TAILOR SHOPS NOT IN GREEN. SO THAT'S AN OVERLAP IN THE LIST.
I DON'T KNOW. OKAY, NOT NOT A BIG THING, BUT JUST, YOU KNOW, CLARIFICATION. SO THINKING
[00:25:03]
ABOUT THE, THE OWNER THAT CAME IN AND, AND VOICED HIS CONCERNS ABOUT SOME OF THESE USES. I DON'T, I DON'T SEE ANYWHERE HERE NECESSARILY. AND THIS COULD BE A WORDING THING THAT EXPLICITLY SAYS NO DRIVE THROUGH RESTAURANTS. AND, AND I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH HAVING THOSE. AND THEN HE MENTIONED SPECIFICALLY LIKE URGENT CARE, I SEE MEDICAL FACILITIES. AND SO AGAIN, I'M NOT SURE I SEE WHERE THE DISCONNECT IS. SO DO WE KIND OF KNOW WHERE THE DISCONNECT BETWEEN THE, THE LANDOWNER OR THE AND WHAT STAFF IS RECOMMENDING? ARE WE ARE WE CLOSE? ARE WE FAR APART? I'M IN GENERAL, I'M PRETTY HAPPY WITH THIS LIST. YOU KNOW, WHEN I LOOKED AT IT EARLIER THIS WEEK, IT'S LIKE, OKAY, I MEAN, I THINK I THINK YOU HIT MOST OF THEM THAT I WOULD EXPECT THAT YOU WOULD WANT THE FLEXIBILITY FOR. AND, YOU KNOW, I'VE, I CLEARLY DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY SOME OF THEM AREN'T THERE, YOU KNOW, NOT NECESSARILY THAT I TOTALLY AGREE WITH SOME OF THOSE NOT BEING THERE, BUT I UNDERSTAND THE RATIONALE BEHIND IT. OKAY. SO THAT'S THAT'S KIND OF WHERE I AM. I WAS OF THE OPINION THAT THAT I WAS READY TO GO AHEAD AND, AND VOTE ON THIS TONIGHT. SO THAT'S, THAT'S WHERE I AM. SO THANK YOU.ANYBODY ELSE WANT TO TALK ABOUT IT? SEEING WHO'S IN WHO'S IN THE QUEUE. IT'S DAVIS. AND NEXT THANK YOU. AND GOOD JOB WITH WITH THE QUEUE. CAN YOU GO BACK TO 2 OR 3 SLIDES FROM FROM HERE.
ONE MORE TO THE ILLUSTRATIONS THAT MY MY POINT. IT'S OKAY IF WE DON'T GET TO IT. I DON'T REMEMBER WHAT SLIDE IT WAS, BUT GREAT JOB ON OUTLINING THE HOW WE WANT IT DESIGNED. PERFECT.
THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY. WELL, LET ME BACK UP THE OUTDOOR SPACES. YES, 1,000% ON THAT ON HOW WE'RE DESIGNING IT. MY QUESTION IS, ARE WE OR DO WE HAVE TO PUT IN WRITING OR GO FURTHER INTO DETAIL ON THE PARKING SITUATION? BECAUSE I THINK WE HAVE A REAL OPPORTUNITY TO DO EXACTLY WHAT YOU WROTE HERE. AND IN ABSTRACT OF HAVING WALKABILITY. AND IN MY MIND, READING THAT, ENVISIONING PARKING ALMOST LIKE OUT OF THE WAY, MAYBE ON THE OUTSIDE AND PEOPLE CAN KIND OF COME INTO THAT GATHERING SPOT. I MEAN, THAT THAT'S SPOT ON.
BUT DO WE IT DOES STAFF SEE A NEED TO PUT THAT IN WRITING? SO IF A DEVELOPER COMES IN AND SAYS, HEY, THIS IS GREAT, I WANT TO WORK WITH YOU, BUT CAN WE ADJUST THE PARKING? CAN WE HAVE HAVE SOMETHING IN WRITING TO GO BACK TO AND SAY, THIS IS WHAT WE INTEND. THIS IS THE VISION, THIS IS THE WHY AND HOW IT'S ALIGNED TO WHAT CITY COUNCIL WANTS TO DO, BECAUSE THIS IS GREAT. I JUST WANT TO I WANT TO SEE THIS IN. YEAH. NO, CERTAINLY. I MEAN, IF THAT'S SOMETHING THAT YOU OR IF THE COMMISSION WOULD LIKE TO CONSIDER AS PART OF THE ORDINANCE THAT IS ADOPTED, WE CAN DEFINITELY TAKE A LOOK AT THAT. I THINK FROM A STAFF PERSPECTIVE, WE TRY TO BE AS SPECIFIC AS POSSIBLE WITH THE VISION, WHILE STILL PROVIDING FLEXIBILITY TO ANY SORT OF DEVELOPER THAT MIGHT COME FORWARD. BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT, YOU KNOW, KIND OF LIMITING OR SAYING SPECIFICALLY WHERE THE PARKING SHOULD BE WOULDN'T NECESSARILY LIMIT THAT. GOTCHA. AND AGAIN, THIS IS GREAT. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S THAT I'M ARTICULATING. WE HAVE A VERY GOOD OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE THE OUTDOOR AND GATHERING SPACES WHERE THERE HASN'T BEEN SOMETHING LIKE WHAT YOU'RE ENVISIONING HERE THAT'S CURRENTLY IN MISSOURI CITY. SO. OKAY, SO WE. THANK YOU. I DID HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS WHEN I WENT THROUGH AND LOOKED AT WHO'S CURRENTLY IN TRACT A ONE, SEE WHAT ALL OF THOSE BUSINESSES CURRENTLY BE COVERED BY THE LIST OF PERMITTED USES AND WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED. YES, THEY WOULD BE. SO WHERE DOES A NAIL SALON FALL IN THE LIST? BARBER BEAUTY SHOPS. THAT'S A BARBER BEAUTY SHOP. GOT IT. OKAY, SO EVERYTHING THAT'S CURRENTLY IN THERE WOULD BE ALLOWED TO STAY. CORRECT. JUST A COUPLE QUESTIONS ON A COUPLE OF EXCLUSIONS. REAL ESTATE OFFICES, SAVINGS AND LOANS. YEAH. UNDER PROFESSIONAL OFFICE.
WHAT'S THAT. THAT WOULD BE INCLUDED UNDER PROFESSIONAL OFFICES. SO THAT'S THE REASON THEY'RE NOT INCLUDED BY LINE. THEY'RE ALL UNDER THAT. GOT IT. OKAY. AND THAT'S IT. THANK YOU.
ARMSTRONG YOU'RE YOU'RE NEXT. YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE? YOU'RE DONE. THANK YOU. I JUST HAVE ONE QUESTION. I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD, GO AHEAD, GO AHEAD. I WAS LOOKING THAT WAY. OKAY. I JUST HAVE ONE QUESTION. AND THIS I TO ECHO WHAT MY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS HAVE STATED.
THANK YOU ALL FOR PUTTING THIS TOGETHER. THE RENDERINGS LOOK REALLY, REALLY GOOD. AND SO MY
[00:30:02]
QUESTION IS IN REGARDS TO THAT. SO I KNOW THAT ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS WILL BE FOLLOWED. AND THE CITY ORDINANCE, AND I SEE THAT WHEN IT COMES TO STREETSCAPE AND THE PEDESTRIAN OUTDOOR, THERE'S SOME QUALIFYING INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT A DEVELOPER OR OWNER WOULD HAVE TO DO. I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW, HOW WOULD THIS BE MANAGED SO THAT WE CAN MAKE SURE THERE'S SOME CONSISTENCY WHEN THESE BUSINESSES COME IN IN REGARDS TO WHAT THEY MAY PICK AS AN ENHANCEMENT. AND SO JUST TO MAKE SURE THERE ARE CONSISTENCY AMONG AMONGST THOSE THAT COME IN TO DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY. SURE. AND I THINK HAVING THAT OPEN COMMUNICATION WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS IS WHERE IT BECOMES REALLY IMPORTANT FOR THAT. I KNOW ONE OF THE TRACKS THAT ARE LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST, THEY HAVE BEEN IN VERY OPEN COMMUNICATION WITH US AND WANTING TO WORK WITH US AND HAVE BEEN TRACKING THIS PROCESS. SO DEFINITELY WORKING REALLY CLOSELY WITH STAFF AND MAKING SURE THAT, YOU KNOW, THE ELEMENTS THAT ARE INCORPORATED IN THE ORDINANCE AND THAT ARE BEING PRESENTED TO YOU TONIGHT ARE THE ONES THAT ARE BEING IMPLEMENTED BY THAT DEVELOPER. AND I BELIEVE THE ONLY OTHER TRACK REALLY OPEN FOR DEVELOPMENT IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST, WHICH IS THAT ONE SINGLE ACRE. SO BOTH OF THOSE KIND OF OPERATE IN OUR OWN SEPARATELY. AND SO BOTH, I BELIEVE, WOULD BE DEVELOPED SEPARATELY. SO THE HOPE IS WITH THE SINGLE DEVELOPER, THEY WOULD BE CONSISTENT IN THE WAY THAT THEY DEVELOP DEVELOP THAT PROPERTY. AND SAME THING WITH THE ONE ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE STREET. CAN I ASK A FOLLOW UP? SO JUST TO CLARIFY OR TO ADD ON TO THAT. SO IN, IN WORKING WITH THE CITY, THERE SHOULD BE SOMEONE ON OUR, ON OUR STAFF, ON OUR TEAM WHO'S MAKING SURE THAT IT IS CONSISTENT, CORRECT? YES. SO THIS WILL ALL GO THROUGH PLAN REVIEW, BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW. THAT WILL BE SOMEBODY FROM OUR STAFF THAT REVIEWS THAT AND REVIEWS IT SPECIFICALLY AGAINST THE ORDINANCE AS ADOPTED AS WELL. SO YES, THERE WILL DEFINITELY BE SOMEBODY ON STAFF THAT IS REVIEWING AND MAKING SURE THAT THESE REQUIREMENTS ARE BEING UPHELD. OKAY. THANK YOU. HANEY. YOU'RE UP. I'M BACK AGAIN. YOU'RE BACK IN THE QUEUE AGAIN. YES. SO TO COMMISSIONER DAVIDSON'S QUESTION ABOUT THE PARKING STRUCTURE AND EVERYTHING LIKE THAT, IS IT DO YOU THINK WHAT YOU HAVE IN THERE IS SUFFICIENT TO ADDRESS HIS CONCERN OR, OR IS IT SOMETHING WE REALLY NEED TO ADD? I MEAN, I, I UNDERSTAND WHAT HE'S LOOKING FOR AND AND, AND. WHAT I'M WONDERING IS THE COMBINATION OF THE WALKABILITY AND EVERYTHING LIKE THAT DOES, DOES THAT KIND OF MEET WHAT HE'S LOOKING FOR? OR DO WE NEED TO DO SOMETHING MORE SPECIFIC? I WOULD PROBABLY SAY REALLY JUST DEPENDS ON THE EXACT VISION FOR THE SITE AS STAFF HAS PRESENTED. IT JUST AGAIN, PROVIDES A BROAD OVERVIEW OF OR NOT BROAD OVERVIEW, BUT A BROAD KIND OF REQUIREMENT THAT THERE HAS TO BE SOME SORT OF CONNECTIVITY, NOT NECESSARILY HOW THAT CONNECTIVITY IS LAID OUT. SO IF THERE'S A SPECIFIC SORT OF VISION FOR THE LAYOUT OF IT, THEN YEAH, I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT IS ADOPTED. YOU KNOW, WITH THE STAFF REPORT. YEAH. BUT I GUESS WHAT I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT IS UNTIL YOU HAVE A PROPOSED SITE PLAN, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO KNOW NECESSARILY. AND, AND IF WE PUT SOMETHING IN THERE THAT'S REALLY SPECIFIC, POTENTIALLY TYING THE HANDS OF WHOEVER. THAT THE DEVELOPER THAT MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO DO IT. AND IF I CAN HELP ON THAT, I THINK IF THE COMMISSION CAN PROVIDE LIKE SOME KEY POINTS THAT ARE CHARACTERISTICS OF WHAT WOULD PUSH TOWARDS THAT DESIGN, BECAUSE IN THE ORDINANCE CAN THEN REFLECT SOME OF THOSE KEY ELEMENTS. ONE OF THE OTHER THINGS IS WE CAN ALSO USE PICTURE EXAMPLES IN AN EXHIBIT TO HELP ILLUSTRATE WHAT THE INTENT IS. YEAH. SO I WAS LOOKING AT THE THE STAFF REPORT AS WRITTEN AND REALLY UNDER PARKING. YOU JUST REFERENCED SECTION 12. AND I COULDN'T BRING SECTION 12 UP. SO SECTION 12 PROBABLY DOESN'T ADDRESS MR. DAVIDSON'S CONCERN. I THINK THE THE OTHER POINTS THAT YOU HAVE HERE COME MORE CLOSELY. BUT SO I'M I'M JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND, CAN CAN WE DO A MOTION TONIGHT THAT WOULD HAVE YOU ADD THOSE THINGS OR DO WE NEED TO GO BACK AND, AND DO THE WORK AND PRESENT IT AGAIN? THAT'S REALLY UP TO YOU ALL STAFF CAN CERTAINLY TAKE A LOOK AT SOME POSSIBILITIES AND BRING THAT BACK FORWARD IN A STAFF REPORT, OR IF THERE ARE CERTAIN KEY CHARACTERISTICS THAT YOU'RE[00:35:03]
THINKING OF THAT YOU WOULD LIKE ADOPTED WITH THE REPORT, THAT CAN ALSO BE DONE AS WELL. YEAH.IF I CAN SKIP THE LINE FOR TWO SECONDS, I, I APPRECIATE YOU'RE IN LINE. I KNOW, I KNOW, I KNOW, OH, OKAY. SO ACTUALLY I WAS ABSOLUTELY AGREE WITH MY COLLEAGUE ON THAT. NOT TRYING TO HAMSTRING ANYBODY. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IN A SENSE, THROUGH LANGUAGE, WE'RE, WE'RE PROTECTED THROUGH OUR VISION THAT YOU'VE ALREADY LAID OUT HERE THAT I THINK IS VERY CLOSELY TIED TO WHAT CITY COUNCIL KIND OF OUTLAID. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE AGAIN, TO TO HIS POINT, IF A DEVELOPER COMES IN AND SAYS, OH, IT LOOKS REALLY NICE, BUT IT DOESN'T MEET THE PARK, THE PARKING, HOW WE HANDLE NON FOOT TRAFFIC IS GOING TO BE IMPORTANT FOR THIS SPACE. AND SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE WHAT WE NEED TO HAVE WHEN WE'RE AT THE TABLE NEGOTIATING. SO AS LONG AS WE'RE COMFORTABLE I DEFINITELY AGREE. ADDING TO THAT AND WE CAN VOTE ON IT TODAY, WHICH I'M IN AGREEMENT WITH WOULD BE FINE. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S ADDED IN. SOMETHING FOR CITY COUNCIL TO DISCUSS. JUST JUST FOR IF I CAN INTERJECT FOR MY FOR, FOR PURPOSES OF DRAFTING ON A SORT OF APPROVING WITH MODIFICATIONS TO THE PARKING, I THINK FOR STAFF, IT WOULD BE REALLY HELPFUL IF YOU'RE REFERRING TO SORT OF A INTERNAL PARKING STRUCTURE, SETBACK, MINIMUM SETBACKS, THOSE SORT OF TOUCHDOWNS THAT COULD GUIDE THE WAY THE REVISIONS ARE DRAFTED. OKAY. LET ME MAKE SURE I'M GOING TO LOOK IT UP REAL QUICK AND MAKE SURE I SAY IT RIGHT. GOTCHA. OKAY. SO THE WAY YOU TOOK YOURSELF OUT, I THINK THAT'S STILL WHAT WAS THERE FROM BEFORE. OKAY, OKAY. YOU HAVE TO CLEAR IT. YEAH. YES. OKAY. YEAH. THERE YOU GO. THERE YOU GO. SO WE'RE GOOD. OKAY. SO NOW THE DISCUSSION IS WE'RE LOOKING AT WORDAGE THAT CAN BE INCLUDED. IS THAT IS THAT PART I WAS LOOKING FOR PARKING. WELL, LET ME ASK THIS THEN. I'LL JUST SINCE WE'RE IN DISCUSSION, THE THE SPACE I'M GOING TO GET PROBABLY REALLY TRANSPARENT NOW. THE SPACE NEAR THE GALLERIA OR STEAK 48 IS THAT WHERE ESSENTIALLY YOU PARK, YOU PARK WHEREVER YOU PARK ON THE OUTSIDE OF ALL OF THE SHOPS, AND YOU CAN GO IN AND LITERALLY JUST WALK ABOUT, NOT TIED DIRECTLY TO THAT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE EXACTLY THAT, BUT SOMETHING LIKE THAT, I THINK WOULD WOULD HELP. AM I MAKING SENSE? OKAY. YEAH. READY TO HELP YOU? I'M READY. OKAY.
BECAUSE WHAT COME TO MIND WAS YOU THINK ABOUT SOME OF THESE PLACES WHERE THE PARKING BASICALLY IS IN THE REAR, RIGHT? AND I'M NOT SURE I WOULD LIKE THAT TERM, BUT BUT I WOULD SAY THAT THAT YOU DON'T WANT THE PARKING TO IMPEDE THE PEDESTRIAN FLOW. OKAY. AND THAT MAY BE A GOOD WAY OF PUTTING IT SO THAT, THAT THE DEVELOPER UNDERSTANDS THAT CONCEPT. RIGHT.
AND, AND, AND SO WHATEVER THE DESIGN THEY COME UP WITH, YOU CAN TEST IT AGAINST THAT. RIGHT? AND SO THAT MIGHT MEET, I'M GLAD YOU'RE SITTING CLOSER NEXT TO ME BECAUSE WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR, THAT'S LIKE A SQUARE, BASICALLY LIKE SQUARE STYLE SORT OF DEVELOPMENT WHERE THERE'S A GATHERING SPACE AND THE SHOPS ARE CENTERED AROUND THAT GATHERING SPACE. AND THEN ALL OF THE PARKING IS KIND OF LOCATED TO THE OUTSKIRTS OF IT. YEAH. IT'S, IT'S ALMOST LIKE, AGAIN, I'M NOT SURE I LIKE PUTTING THIS TERM IN, BUT OFFSITE PARKING, YOU KNOW? WELL, HIS HIS COMMENT ON TESTING AGAINST WHAT, WHAT THE DEVELOPER HAS, LIKE IF YOU HAVE, THAT'S WHAT I WAS TRYING TO GET AT. ULTIMATELY, IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING ON PAPER THAT YOU CAN LOOK BACK AND SAY, OKAY, DOES THIS MATCH UP BASED ON WHAT THE DEVELOPER IS HAVING? THAT'S IT.
SO THAT COULD BE THE LANGUAGE. BOLDEN, I SEE YOU IN THE QUEUE. SORRY. IT'S OKAY. YOU KNOW, I THINK I THINK WE'RE ALL SAYING THE SAME THING HERE. AND LOOKING AT THE PHOTOS IT'S YOU CAN SEE WHAT YOU ALL ARE PRESENTING, WHICH IS EXCELLENT. IT'S PRETTY MUCH WE'RE PUTTING THE PARKING AWAY FROM THE ACTIVITIES AND I CAN'T, I, WE CAN'T REALLY USE SETBACK PARKING BECAUSE SETBACK PARK IS MORE OR LESS FROM THE STANDPOINT OF PUSHING THINGS ALL THE WAY. THIS IS MORE OR LESS OF A DECENTRALIZED TYPE OF MODEL OF PARKING TO WHERE YOU HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO TRULY ENJOY THE ACTIVITIES THAT ARE BEING PRESENTED. SO I THINK WE NEED TO KIND OF PUT SOME VERBIAGE IN THERE FROM THAT STANDPOINT. IT'S JUST MY RECOMMENDATION FROM EXPERIENCE. OKAY, I'M SORRY I HAD TO GET BACK IN THE QUEUE AGAIN SO I COULD BECAUSE I LIKE HIS WORD DECENTRALIZED. OKAY. REMEMBER I SAID OFFSITE? YEAH, I LIKE DECENTRALIZED BETTER. SO THE MODEL HERE AND JUST FROM EXPERIENCE, FROM THE STANDPOINT IS THIS IS A DECENTRALIZED PARKING MODEL, NOT MORE OR LESS CENTRALIZED PARKING MODEL THAT
[00:40:01]
ADDS CHAOS INTO THE ACTIVITIES. SO WE WANT TO PUT THAT VERBIAGE IN THERE TO ADD VALUE IF WE COULD. SO MAYBE THIS IS A QUESTION FOR MATT. COULD THE LANGUAGE BE LOCATE PARKING TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE DEVELOPMENT OUTSKIRTS? YEAH, I MEAN, I, I THINK EMOTION, YOU KNOW, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING QUALIFICATIONS, INCLUDING DECENTRALIZED PART AND, YOU KNOW, DECENTRALIZED PARKING. I'M COMFORTABLE WITH, WITH THAT LANGUAGE SPECIFIC TO, I'M GUESSING THE COMMERCIAL TRACKS. SO BASED ON THE DISCUSSION, IF THE UNDERSTANDING IS IT IS THIS DECENTRALIZED MODEL OF PARKING, YOU KNOW, APPROVING THE, THE STAFF REPORT SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING REVISIONS FOR THE COMMERCIAL TRACKS, A DECENTRALIZED PARKING REGULATION OR SOMETHING ALONG THOSE LINES. WELL, WITH THIS BEING A VERY SIGNIFICANT ASPECT OF IT, WOULD STAFF WANT TO HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO WORK ON THE EXACT WORDING AS OPPOSED TO, YES, VOTING ON IT TONIGHT? YES. BECAUSE TWO TO THE POINT IS WE UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT, WE GET IT, BUT WE DON'T WANT TO RECOMMEND SOMETHING THAT THEN CREATES ANOTHER SITUATION. AND THEN KEEPING IN MIND THAT WE DO HAVE A DEVELOPED SITE. AND SO WE'RE TRYING TO STEER CLEAR OF CREATING, YOU KNOW, NON-CONFORMING SPACES, BUT THEN RECOGNIZING HOW DO HOW WE TAKE IT TOWARDS THE FUTURE. SO WE WOULD LIKE SOME TIME TO, TO KIND OF HASH THAT OUT. OKAY.OKAY. THAT WAS A GOOD MIND MELD, BY THE WAY, GOING ON. IT'S PRETTY GOOD. SO. NOW I'VE LOST MY TRAIN OF THOUGHT. JUST PAUSE FOR A MOMENT. YEAH. SHE THE STAFF WAS, SHE WAS SAYING SOMETHING ABOUT WHAT STAFF WANTED TO DO AND I THOUGHT, OH, OKAY. BUT NOW YEAH, I'M I'M OUT.
SO JUST TO BE CLEAR, WE WANT TO MAKE A MOTION TO BRING IT BACK BEFORE US WITH THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE PARKING ASPECT OF IT OR THE LOCATION OF THE PARKING. DO WE NEED A MOTION FOR THAT? SO DO WE. YEAH. YOU DON'T NEED A MOTION. IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION JUST TO TO PUT IT ON THE RECORD, IT'S POSSIBLE CONSIDERATION. WE'VE RECEIVED DIRECTION. SO WE DON'T NEED TO DO A MOTION. SO THAT'S WHERE WE ARE. ARE WE ALL IN CONSENSUS WITH THAT. YES SIR. YES SIR. YES, COMMISSIONER. YEAH. YOU'RE IN THE QUEUE. SO OKAY. TRYING TO TRYING TO USE THE TOOLS. SO WHAT WOULD BE HELPFUL FOR ME AFTER WE PUT THIS TOGETHER IS MAYBE A COUPLE OF EXAMPLES OF WHAT THAT WOULD LOOK LIKE, BECAUSE I HEAR THE LANGUAGE, BUT UNTIL IT GOES ON A PIECE OF PAPER IN FRONT OF US, I'D LIKE TO SEE HOW THAT WOULD WORK IN PRACTICALITY, BECAUSE WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT 150 ACRE SITE HERE. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TWO CORNERS, SO I'D LIKE TO SEE HOW THAT WOULD WORK FUNCTIONALLY AND PRACTICALLY BEFORE WE WRITE SOMETHING THAT A DEVELOPER IS GOING TO LOOK AT AND SAY, IT CAN'T BE DONE. SO IF WE COULD HAVE SOMETHING LIKE THAT NEXT TIME, THAT WOULD BE WONDERFUL. THANK YOU. I'M IN THE QUEUE AGAIN BECAUSE I REMEMBER. I REMEMBER HE JOGGED MY WE NEED TO FOCUS ON THE UNDEVELOPED LAND THAT'S BUILT OUT. WE'RE NOT GOING TO NECESSARILY SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGE THAT. I MEAN, OBVIOUSLY THERE'S OPPORTUNITIES MAYBE TO IMPROVE THAT AREA. BUT BUT I THINK THE FOCUS IS ON THOSE TWO UNDEVELOPED TRACKS, RIGHT? SO WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE THE WORDING ARTICULATES THAT. THANK YOU. YOU GOT THE DIRECTION. YES. OKAY. OKAY.
MOVING RIGHT ALONG. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 11 ZONING TEXT AMENDMENTS. I SEE THERE ARE NONE TONIGHT. MOVING ON TO AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 12, I SEE NONE ARE ON HERE TONIGHT. SO THE LAST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS TO ADJOURN. I ADJOURN THE MEETING AT. OH I'M SORRY. WE NEED A MOTION. WE CAN'T WE ACTUALLY WE DON'T NEED A MOTION. WE DON'T IF WE GO BY UNANIMOUS CONSENT. IF THERE IS NO OBJECTION, OKAY. THE GAME COMES ON. SO SO DO WE HAVE ADJOURN.
OKAY. SO WE DIDN'T NEED
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.